However, Bamford and her team believe that the mini-magnetospheres can protect patches on the Moon’s surface from solar wind and solar flares. When the solar wind hits the weak magnetic bubbles, a much stronger electric field is generated. “Darker material is older, and these patches, which look like spilled milk, are whiter – so the material there is younger, less weathered, because it’s shielded from the solar bombardment,” says Bamford. The shield is not the magnetic field itself, but the resulting electric one.
To confirm the idea, the researchers tried to mimic the conditions on a much smaller scale in a plasma wind tunnel. A magnet the size of a coin was put in the path of a stream of protons. The magnet’s field interacted with the plasma in the tunnel and generated an electric field that made most of the incoming particles swerve around it – similar to raindrops deflected off an umbrella.
The finding was proof the researchers needed that the concept could be applied to a spacecraft. Using magnetic fields to protect spaceships is not a new idea – it was first suggested in the 1960s. The concept was abandoned, though, because scientists believed they would need to create a huge magnetic field, something that’s impossible to do on a rocket. But Bamford says that it is not the size of the magnetic “bubble” that matters, but the steepness of the magnetic rise. The actual shield can be much smaller if the gradient in the magnetic field is steep enough.
Now that the researchers have performed the initial lab tests and done elaborate computer simulations – about to be published in an upcoming paper – their next step will be a test on a much larger scale – around a real spacecraft – in space.
The scientists propose to place superconducting coils on the sides of a spacecraft. Once coils are cooled down to extremely low temperatures using liquid helium, and then charged up with a very high electrical current, they would generate a magnetic bubble-like field around the ship. Just as in the lab test, a solar storm’s plasma is expected to interact with the magnetic field and self-generate an electric field, says Professor Bob Bingham, another physicist at RAL Space. “I know it sounds very complicated, but we now have all the calculations and computer simulations to support our idea,” he adds.
The big question is how practical this system is. “It might work, but such shields have never really been tested [outside the lab], and it’s not a lightweight option,” says Stephen Bennington from Cella Energy, a UK-based spinout of the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, which is developing an alternative shield using hydrogen-rich material that is lighter than polyethylene. “On a trip to Mars and back, you need to make sure you have enough helium and you can keep that helium cool. So you’ve got the weight of the coils, the weight of the helium, all the thermal insulation – and the bigger the spacecraft, the bigger your kit will have to be.”
The team at Cella Energy believe their hydrogen-rich material could make an effective shield for satellites because it absorbs high-energy radiation, and is less likely than current aluminium shields to emit protons and neutrons after radiation bombardment, which can disrupt electronic equipment. Nasa is currently looking into the idea, with the hope of testing a prototype on board the ISS.
Who knows whether we will achieve the dream of reaching the Moon again, or Mars. But we will still need to raise deflector shields even if human space transport is limited to the relatively more convenient destination of geostationary orbit. If this is the case, then astronauts may well be talking about different type of final frontier: magnetic shields and physical materials covering the walls of their spacecraft.