Obama's Afghanistan pullout plan pleases few

 
US soldier at an outpost in Afghanistan (file pic) The US will have some 70,000 troops in Afghanistan after September 2012

There's cold comfort for President Obama from his military advisers.

The head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm Mike Mullen, has told a congressional committee he backs the decision to bring the surge troops home rapidly. But he didn't at first, and thinks it's risky.

He told a committee: "I am comfortable that conditions on the ground will dominate - as they have dominated - future decisions about our force posture in Afghanistan. Let me be candid, however. No commander ever wants to sacrifice fighting power in the middle of a war. And no decision to demand that sacrifice is ever without risk."

He then added: "I would prefer not to discuss the specifics of the private advice I rendered with respect to these decisions. As I said, I support them. What I can tell you is, the president's decisions are more aggressive and incur more risk than I was originally prepared to accept.

"More force for more time is, without doubt, the safer course. But that does not necessarily make it the best course. Only the president, in the end, can really determine the acceptable level of risk we must take. I believe he has done so."

Then, answering questions about the wider region - in other words Pakistan and India - "I worry we'll be back, but it'll be more dangerous and more challenging."

All round there's plenty of criticism. In one blog a former marine argues the decision is "strategically myopic and tactically dangerous".

This opinion piece says the president has confirmed America's decline and echoes dangerous words about Vietnam.

Democrats think it is not quick enough, with their leader in the House Nancy Pelosi saying: "It has been the hope of many in Congress and across the country that the full drawdown of US forces would happen sooner than the president laid out - and we will continue to press for a better outcome."

So, few love the plan. But I suspect a lot of this is Beltway chatter.

I await the first opinion polls after the speech but I suspect many Americans will welcome the president refocusing on what he called "nation-building at home".

 
Mark Mardell Article written by Mark Mardell Mark Mardell North America editor

Is Obama right over Iraq?

The Obama doctrine says the US will only go to war if its vital interests or those of its allies are threatened, so what does that mean for Iraq?

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
 

Comments 5 of 240

 

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • FrogsBright...but deadly

    The vivid skin of the Amazon's golden poison arrow frog contains toxins strong enough to kill a human

Programmes

  • Islamic StateClick Watch

    Can the location of Islamic State militants be found with open source data?

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.