Afghan troop withdrawal could be faster, says Cameron

 

The BBC's James Landale asked David Cameron why only some of the UK's troops would be returning home

UK troops could be withdrawn from Afghanistan more quickly than previously announced, David Cameron has suggested.

The prime minister announced this week that numbers would be cut from 9,000 to 5,200 next year.

But, on a pre-Christmas visit to Camp Bastion in Helmand province, he said there was "flexibility" in the plan.

There had been better-than-expected progress in training the country's own security, Mr Cameron added.

On Wednesday, the prime minister announced cuts in troop numbers serving in Afghanistan as part of the plan to end combat operations in 2014.

But he told reporters at Camp Bastion: "Of course there is always flexibility in any plan."

'Haven of terrorism'

During the visit he acknowledged that troops had paid a "high price" but said their efforts had been worthwhile.

More than 400 UK personnel have died since the operation in Afghanistan began in 2001 but the military presence has cut the number of terrorist plots, Mr Cameron said.

During his trip, he played table football and attended a carol service.

On his traditional seasonal visit to troops, Mr Cameron toured Camp Bastion and was taken by helicopter to the smaller Camp Price operating base about 20 miles (32km) away.

David Cameron plays table football with Royal Marines at Forward Operating Base Price David Cameron plays table football with Royal Marines at Forward Operating Base Price

All Nato operations are due to finish by the end of 2014, with responsibility being transferred to Afghan forces.

Mr Cameron suggested the Afghans were acquiring the "capability" to take charge of security.

"This is withdrawal. This is drawdown based on success not on failure," he said.

"We're confident it can be done while making sure Afghanistan does not return to become a haven of terrorism, which is of course why we came here in the first place."

He added: "We have paid a very heavy price but I think the reason for coming here in the first place, which was to stop Afghanistan being a haven for terror... I think it was the right decision."

Troop numbers are already being reduced from 9,500 to 9,000 before Christmas.

A small number of British troops would remain in the country beyond that, working at an officer training academy and "involved in returning equipment and dealing with logistics", Mr Cameron told MPs at Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday.

But during his visit to Afghanistan, government officials promised an extra £230m from Treasury reserves would be spent on military kit to see the campaign through.

The funding includes £29m for additional bomb detectors; a £10m upgrade for armed vehicles; more military dogs for foot patrols and £5m to boost intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance at Camp Bastion.

BBC deputy political editor James Landale, travelling with the prime minister, said the aim of the visit was to give troops some sense of reassurance about their role.

Commanders do not want to leave Afghanistan before the "job is done", he added.

With the insurgency pushed out to the edges of society, and the Afghan army and police improving, there was a growing sense of optimism in the country, commanders had told him.

 

More on This Story

UK troops in Afghanistan

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 222.

    This is good news indeed! The way the Afganistan is, there will always be conflict and if we stay until the conflict is over we would either need to occupy or spend lives and money on maintaining the currest situation.

    Training the local authorities and leaving it to them is the right thing as it's their country.

    It's time to bring our troops home to their families.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 126.

    we shouldn’t be too hasty in the withdrawal of our troops. The Taliban are still a strong force and they would inevitably take over the country if the allied forces left too soon. If that were to happen our men and women would have died for nothing. We need to see the job through to completion.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 122.

    Our troops in Afghanistan have been doing sterling work against the Taliban and we are long past the question of whether they should have gone there or not.

    Currently they keep the Taliban at bay but at high personal cost.

    This has created a situation where probably never will be a right time to leave but we cannot afford the personal cost of remaining.

  • rate this
    +16

    Comment number 116.

    Perhaps the main reason for continued deaths there is our continued presence. It's not worth a single drop of our soldiers' blood - we want nothing from Afghanistan & they want nothing from us. So, let's bring all our troops home now, weep for the brave men & women who died & never do anything as foolish as this again.

  • rate this
    +36

    Comment number 49.

    Perhaps the saddest part of this decision to withdraw is that a majority of people said at the time we should not go and could not win. Even more have been dissenting from the government view as each death was announced. If the government had listened hundreds of lives and the many wounded they won't even number for us would have been saved. Too many war mongers in this bankrupt country still.

 

Comments 5 of 11

 

More UK Politics stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

  • Prostitute in red light district in Seoul, South KoreaSex for soldiers

    How Korea helped prostitutes work near US military bases


  • LuckyDumped

    The rubbish collector left on the scrap heap as his city goes green


  • Jamal Bryant'Buying black'

    Ferguson campaign targets Black Friday


  • A picture of Michael Brown displayed during his memorial service.Smoke screen

    Why did Michael Brown prosecutors focus on marijuana?


Elsewhere on the BBC

  • UnderwaterHidden depths

    How do you explore the bottom of the ocean? BBC Future finds out

Programmes

  • A model with a projection mapped onto her faceClick Watch

    Face hacking - how to use a computer to turn your face into a work of digital art

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.