Aboutalebi: Let him into the US?

President Barack Obama giving a speech on 11 April, 2014. President Obama has decided to deny Hamid Aboutalebi's visa request

Related Stories

The Obama administration announced on Friday that it has decided to deny a visa to Hamid Aboutalebi, whom Iran had selected to be its permanent representative to the UN.

Mr Aboutalebi's appointment had become a hot-button source of controversy in Washington, as politicians and the media debated whether a man who had ties to the 1979 hostage standoff at the US embassy in Iran should be allowed to enter the US.

The Iranian government contends that Mr Aboutalebi was only a translator for the hostage-takers and did not participate in the taking of the embassy.

That explanation doesn't fly with the editors of the Washington Times.

Start Quote

Hostage-taking is the credential of a terrorist, not of a diplomatic host”

End Quote Editorial The Washington Times

"Americans of a certain age will not forget their bitter anger at watching 52 countrymen paraded, bound and blindfolded, through the streets of Tehran, nor the endless anxiety felt while the American diplomats were held prisoner for 444 days," they write. "Hostage-taking is the credential of a terrorist, not of a diplomatic host."

They argue that President Barack Obama "must overcome whatever reluctance to offend radical Islam he has and draw a red line around a visa for Mr Aboutalebi, and for once allow no one to erase it."

Republican Doug Lambert, who sponsored a bill in the House of Representatives that would deny visas to UN diplomats who have conducted "terrorist activities", says Americans' "conscience" can't allow Mr Aboutalebi to enter the US.

"We, as Americans, and as people with a memory as well as a conscience, cannot allow such an official on our soil, except to be brought to trial for his participation in illegally holding our diplomats hostage," he writes in the Denver Post.

"While the US is required to allow UN diplomats to come to New York, it has the right to refuse visas to those seeking to work as diplomats in the UN," he writes. "Diplomatic immunity should not apply to terrorists and to their accomplices. "

Mr Lambert's bill passed unanimously in the House on Thursday, and a companion measure was similarly approved by the Senate. Mr Obama has not announced whether he will sign it into law, however.

Barry Rosen, one of the 1979 hostages, says Iran's failure to recognise the crimes it committed against the 52 men and women is why this issue hasn't died down.

Start Quote

It's not unknown for youthful radicals to mature into middle-aged statesmen”

End Quote Editorial Los Angeles Times

"There has never been an acknowledgement of what occurred 35 years ago, much less an apology," he writes in the New York Times. "That silence is the greatest outrage of this controversy."

The editors of the Los Angeles Times have questioned whether the US should be making such a big deal out of the issue and fear that it could adversely affect ongoing negotiations with Iran over its nuclear programme.

They note that Mr Aboutalebi was 22 years old when the hostage incident took place.

"It's not unknown for youthful radicals to mature into middle-aged statesmen," they write.

"The administration has registered its displeasure with Aboutalebi's appointment. Now it should refocus on more important matters, including the nuclear negotiations."

"But even if the Aboutalebi of today were an unreconstructed anti-American, the US would be wrong to try to prevent him from taking up a position at the UN," they continue. "Having agreed to serve as host country of the international organization, the US shouldn't interfere in decisions by member states about their representation in that body any more than it should block foreign leaders it objects to from addressing the UN."

Now that Mr Obama has made his decision, the Iranians will have to decide whether to press the issue or find a new ambassador. Their next step could speak volumes about the long-term prospects for the ongoing nuclear programme negotiations and US-Iranian relations in general.


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 58.

    I could care less about this subject. People playing games.

  • rate this

    Comment number 57.

    54. Continued.

    that a war was to break out in the Middle East, with let's say Iran trying to invade other nations like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Israel, etc. then it is in their best interests to have their people in full support of the war. The more your people support a war, the fewer domestic problems you have to deal with (such as with the US during Iraq and Vietnam).

  • rate this

    Comment number 56.

    The UN owns property worth billions of dollars of property that could be sold so it could go to a more neutral country, and have cash left over. A non-NATO Scandinavian country might be good. Better yet, move it to Kiev which would settle the conflict there. There is no benefit for the US having the UN here (except for the UN diplomats who just love to be subsidized living in NY). .

  • rate this

    Comment number 55.

    Well of course we should allow this representative to the UN to fulfill his duties. We do, after all, allow the likes of Dick Cheney to live here.

  • rate this

    Comment number 54.

    53. Continued.

    words it seems like they are trying to make their people more ultra-nationalistic and anti-American/anti-Western. I'm not saying the USA is innocent of anything, but it's clear they have become the "bogeyman" of at least three nations; China, Russia, and Iran. Most nations that oppose US policies just seem to leave it at that, but these three take it further. In the possible event


Comments 5 of 58


Elsewhere on the BBC

  • TravelAround the world

    BBC Travel takes a look at the most striking images from the past seven days


  • A bicycle with a Copenhagen WheelClick Watch

    The wheel giving push bikes an extra boost by turning them into smart electric hybrids

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.