Texas Republicans endorse gay 'treatment'

Gay rights activists protest outside the Texas Republican Convention on 5 June, 2014. Gay rights protesters gather as Texas Republicans meet in Ft Worth for their state party convention

On Saturday delegates to the Texas Republican Party state convention approved a party platform that embodies many of the most deeply held beliefs of the state's grass-roots, Tea Party conservative base.

Among the greatest hits in the document are: the closing of multiple federal cabinet-level departments, prohibiting the teaching of evolution at schools, a call to block attempts to institute national (or international) education standards such as Common Core, a condemnation of funding for climate change research, elimination of the minimum wage, a repeal of the Voting Rights Act, a call to disregard federal gun-control laws, the creation of a special federal prosecutor to investigate the "Benghazi cover-up" and a condemnation of the United Nation's "Agenda 21" plan to... do something nefarious, I'm sure.

Start Quote

Homosexuality must not be presented as an acceptable alternative lifestyle”

End Quote Texas Republican Party platform

Although a debate over immigration and border security policy drew much of the fire within the convention halls, it was two paragraphs on policy directed toward gay people that generated the most heat outside:

Homosexuality must not be presented as an acceptable alternative lifestyle, in public policy, nor should family be redefined to include homosexual couples. We believe there should be no granting of special legal entitlements or creation of special status for homosexual behaviour, regardless of state of origin.

Additionally, we oppose any criminal or civil penalties against those who oppose homosexuality out of faith, conviction, or belief in traditional values. We recognise the legitimacy and value of counselling which offers reparative therapy and treatment to patients who are seeking escape from the homosexual lifestyle. No laws or executive orders shall be imposed to limit or restrict access to this type of therapy.

The endorsement of "reparative therapy" for gays was quickly condemned by gay rights groups and liberal commentators. As many noted, the American Psychological Association has called the practice a product of "societal ignorance and prejudice" that incorrectly treats same-gender sexual orientation as a mental illness.

"There is no legitimacy or value to this 'reparative therapy', just as there is no 'homosexual lifestyle', since being gay or lesbian or bisexual or transgender stems from biology, not choice," writes Andrew Rosenthal, editorial page editor of the New York Times. "And there certainly should be laws and executive orders banning aversion therapy because it is based on non-science and is almost always deeply harmful to the people who undergo it."

Start Quote

The folks who write it are the true believers, and this is their wish list”

End Quote Forrest Wilder The Texas Observer

The Texas Observer's Forrest Wilder writes that the platform "endorses the wholly discredited, cruel and laughable-if-it-wasn't-so-damaging 'reparative therapy' racket that attempts to turn gay people straight."

Although the platform is nonbinding on the state's Republican candidates, Wilder says it's still important for symbolic reasons, as the party's "guiding document".

"It's also a fascinating glimpse into the id of conservatism," he writes. "The folks who write it are the true believers, and this is their wish list, their vision of a world that conforms to their ideals and beliefs."

According to the Associated Press, the treatment language was the product of former Texas Republican Party chair Cathie Adams, who now leads a social conservative group called Texas Eagle Forum. It was formulated as a response, in part, to recent moves in New Jersey and California to prohibit the treatment's use on minors:

Adams, whose group backed Tea Party outsiders who dominated Texas Republican primary races this year, said she simply promoted language proposed by a man who she says he was helped by such therapy.

"He knows what he's talking about. He is one of those who has benefited," Adams said. "I think the majority of Texans feel that way too. It's not like this is mandatory. This is only a voluntary programme."

Ironically, the controversy over the new language overshadowed the removal of a stronger condemnation of gays that had been included in the platform for the past three decades:

We affirm that the practice of homosexuality tears at the fabric of society and contributes to the breakdown of the family unit. Homosexual behaviour is contrary to the fundamental, unchanging truths that have been ordained by God, recognized by our country's founders and shared by the majority of Texans.

The Associated Press quotes one party delegate, Elizabeth Hunter, who said she didn't find the original language offensive:

"I don't see anybody leaving the Republican Party because of that language," she said. "I think it would actually encourage someone to join when they see that the Republican Party takes a strong stand rather than standing in the middle."



This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 151.

    Some of the most intelligent and compassionate people I know come from Texas. Odd to say they never seem to visit home.

    "If I owned Hell and Texas I'd live in Hell and rent Texas"

    It's the company not the climate.

  • rate this

    Comment number 150.

    When I read about people like this, I truly wonder if America can stay together as a nation. Perhaps we should split up, with a new nation, "Jesusstan" in the South and central US.

    My values are too different from these people's to ever be reconciled.

  • rate this

    Comment number 149.


    Thank you, Jesus, for that awesome link!

  • rate this

    Comment number 148.

    143. American Thinker has some educated staff and the piece covered some verifiable info. What more do you want from a link? Care to argue with the data or are you just put off by the editorial slant and conclusions drawn? Suggest take a position yourself instead of just throwing darts. (Am on record as of the opinion that the tea party/GOP are absolutely the worst people on the planet!)

  • rate this

    Comment number 147.

    130. beammeup -- I don't live in the Bible Belt-and don't have a problem with same sex marriage etc.-my post in 63 - that was real - the dad did do that - didn't say anything because he was loud & mean looking. That boy may not remember in the future - or he may say to a counselor - well I must be gay because I didn't like playing contact sports and I did like bean bag toys.


Comments 5 of 151


Elsewhere on the BBC

  • TravelAround the world

    BBC Travel takes a look at the most striking images from the past seven days


  • A bicycle with a Copenhagen WheelClick Watch

    The wheel giving push bikes an extra boost by turning them into smart electric hybrids

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.