Senators question Dr Oz's science

Dr Mehmet Oz testifying before a US Senate Committee on 17 June, 2014. Dr Mehmet Oz tells a Senate committee he acts as a cheerleader for his television audience

Nearly a decade ago, Dr Mehmet Oz was a celebrity surgeon with golden credentials. Soon after he started appearing on his friend Oprah Winfrey's show, however, "Dr Oz" became an influential household name across the United States.

His own self-titled show, which launched in 2009, is one of the most highly rated on television, with an average of four million viewers a day. As his name has grown in popularity, however, so has his marketing ability - and many critics say that the "medical miracles" Dr Oz endorses are little more than snake oil.

Start Quote

My job, I feel on the show, is to be a cheerleader for the audience”

End Quote Dr Mehmet Oz The Dr Oz Show

At a Senate committee hearing this week, Dr Oz came under fire for his endorsements of weight loss products and nutrition supplements - many of which are not backed by research and lack FDA approval.

In her remarks, Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill did not shy away from her own scepticism.

"When you feature a product on your show, it creates what has become known as 'Oz Effect,' dramatically boosting sales and driving scam artists to pop up overnight using false and deceptive ads to sell questionable products," she said.

"I'm concerned that you are melding medical advice, news and entertainment in a way that harms consumers."

Dr Oz did not back down under Ms McCaskill's berating questioning. He said he "personally believes" in the the products he presents on his programme:

I passionately study them. I recognise that oftentimes they don't have the scientific muster to present as fact. But, nevertheless, I give my audience the advice I give my family all the time.

He explains that he sometimes uses "flowery language" in an attempt to keep viewers interested.

Start Quote

He's not going to stop his breathless endorsements and quick fixes”

End Quote Scott Gavura Science-Based Medicine

"My job, I feel on the show, is to be a cheerleader for the audience," he said. "And when they don't think they have hope, when they don't think they can make it happen, I want to look and I do look everywhere, including alternative healing traditions, for any evidence that might be supportive to them."

In the National Journal, Brian Resnick spells out what he sees as a glaring ethical dilemma.

"Basically, Oz is saying that even if the science is dubious, if he believes in the 'thumbnail sketch' of the preliminary evidence, he'll present it to viewers as a solution to a problem," Resnick writes. "But it isn't science. And given his visibility in homes across the country, businesses will be sure to continue to use his not-quite-scientific endorsements to sell products."

But his enthusiastic endorsements of questionable products may have been the secret to his success, says Forbes's Matthew Herper.

"The big question, to me," he writes, "is whether that man, the surgeon who, after years of cracking people's chests, gives it to the audience straight and gross and gory and scares them with the reality of their biological selves, whether that guy could have succeeded on TV without all the appeals to energy fields and homeopathy and a new 'miracle' supplement every week."

The Daily Beast's Russell Saunders is more blunt:

As a physician, Dr Oz's credentials are truly impressive. He is the vice-chairman of surgery at one of the nation's top medical schools, after all. But somewhere along the way he decided that his fame was more important than his credibility, as demonstrated by his willingness to promote treatments that fail to withstand even the barest scientific scrutiny.

Although the Senate committee's scepticism may influence public opinion, it remains unclear whether their words will change Dr Oz's promotional ways.

Science-Based Medicine's Scott Gavura says, "What's most ironic about Oz is that notwithstanding his weak acknowledgement of the problem with his hyperbole, he still sees himself as the victim. He's not going to stop his breathless endorsements and quick fixes."

(By Annie P Waldman)



This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 61.

    Well done Dr Oz.

    I never thought much of you before, just a another populist medico, but you stood your ground and defended the individuals right to decide on their own health choices.

    Those that understand the value of natural medicine know the dice are loaded in favor of the pharmaceutical industry that peddles unnatural life challenging drugs.

    Run for congress Dr Oz, you might get in!

  • rate this

    Comment number 60.

    59(continued) Dr Oz mentor has tried every diet in the book including really wacky ones and had those people on her show pushing it until she gained the weight back - so its not a surprise that she gave him a show. Personally he reminds me of some the PTL club where the host preaches his doctrine to get the audience clapping like trained seals while taking money from them.

  • rate this

    Comment number 59.

    The Doctors TV another syndicated medical help show has multiple doctors including a plastic surgeon (he is the only one that does indorse products in his field). They also do either help or find correct help for people with various problems and do debate it. More balanced

    Dr Oz on the other hand cheerleads both medicine and diets in a one size fits all way that does not even consider alerf

  • rate this

    Comment number 58.

    Glad to see that congress is asking the hard questions. Because God forbid this time was used to address income inequality, student debt, veteran's benefits, or broken healthcare. I would implore any other Americans who read this, don't vote Democrat. Don't vote Republican. Go to the polls and oust the people gaming our political system against us.

  • rate this

    Comment number 57.

    Just more 'writing on the wall' . america is a lazy, fat, and, by the way, undereducated nation. we are heading to 3rd world status in the near future.


Comments 5 of 61


Elsewhere on the BBC

  • KnucklesGood or bad?

    For many it can be very satisfying to 'crack' the bones in your hand, but is it bad for you?


  • BatteriesClick Watch

    More power to your phone - the lithium-ion batteries that could last twice as long

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.