EU budget: Small storm in large tea-cup

EU Commission building, Brussels Whose 2020 vision will win out?

"A big fuss over nothing". That is how many EU budget experts have described today's fight between the UK and the rest of Europe.

David Cameron would beg to differ. But you can see why Brussels pointy heads would be bemused by the Prime Minister's "line in the sand". If he loses this epic battle, the very worst that could happen is that the UK's contribution to the EU after 2013 will rise by around £500m a year.

That's not nothing. But, as John Springford has pointed out, from the Centre for European Reform, it's the equivalent of about 0.03% of our GDP - roughly the annual budget of Oxfordshire County Council.

Any increase is unwelcome, but that £500m is not just small relative to Britain's economy, it's small relative to the increase we have already seen in Britain's net contribution to the EU. Our net payment more than doubled between 2006 and 2011, from just under £4bn to more than £8bn.

We are unlikely to see anything like this kind of increase in the next few years - in fact, our net payment in 2012 is likely to fall by around £1bn this year, largely as a result of the economic slowdown. That's the key point to remember: the ups and downs of our economy, relative to the rest of the EU, will have a much larger impact on our net contribution to the EU over the next few years than today's argument in Brussels.

That may be, say UK hardliners, but it's the principle that counts. The EU should not be expanding its budget in real terms, when governments across the continent are cutting back.

You can see why they would think this point of principle is important. Luckily for David Cameron, the definition of a "real cut" or a "real freeze" is wonderfully flexible.

As I said on the Today programme this morning, to understand whether David Cameron has "won" or "lost" in Brussels, you need to know exactly what the budget is now, what it would be look like if it were held constant, allowing only for inflation (a "real freeze") - and what, precisely, has been agreed for 2014-20.

The bad news for us journalists is that all three of these numbers are subject to enormous interpretation. For example, the European Commission's initial proposal for a ceiling of 1033bn euros excludes 30bn euros in spending which has to be accounted for somewhere. President Rompuy's proposal cuts 75bn from the Commission's plan, but includes that extra spending, so the numbers don't really add up.

Another wrinkle is that the UK Treasury has also chosen to set 2011 as the base year for calculating the "frozen" budget - not 2013, which might seem more natural and would allow a larger number than the 886bn euros the Treasury has been insisting on.

Of course, that bad news for us is good news for David Cameron. A small - entirely "reasonable" - tweak in the definition of a freeze could pave the way for a great victory for the UK. But whatever happens, he knows that the change in our contribution to Brussels is likely to be, well, small change.

Stephanie Flanders Article written by Stephanie Flanders Stephanie Flanders Former economics editor

So it's goodbye from me

After 11 years at the BBC, I'm leaving for a new role in the City.

Read full article


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 237.

    Germany's tax gaffe. Einstein deflowered.

    A deal yielding €10bn and €750+a year shot down by lawmakers(Senate)

    That same Senate, rubber stamps the EU budget, bailouts for Greece etc and in fact anything or where that DE €uro's are spent.

    Why was Geithner visiting Euro land this summer? What was the deal?

    Swiss tax avoidance, the give was gold colateral status as Tier 1 rather than Tier 3

  • rate this

    Comment number 236.

    "If he loses this epic battle, the very worst that could happen is that the UK's contribution to the EU after 2013 will rise by around £500m a year.".

    £500Million per year iequates to 20x capital requirement to cover this...

    = £10BILLION..and this is just for the increase.!!!!

    The sums just get bigger and bigger.

    Get these printing presses working flat out.

  • rate this

    Comment number 235.

    Yesterday someone said that he EU 'only' spends 6% on administration.
    That's 6% of 1trillionEUR

    its a lot of money but you can either concentrate on cutting the 6% or the other 94%
    If your aim is to save the UK a lot of money you have to concentrate on the 94%, if you want to score political points back home but not save much money then concentrate on the 6% - guess which Cameron is

  • rate this

    Comment number 234.

    We could be in EFTA with Norway:-

    we could
    Norways main agreement with EU is EEA, (Switzerland is EFTA)
    This is what the Norwegian version of UKIP thinks about it

    Note they pay almost as much per head as us NOT to be in the EU

  • rate this

    Comment number 233.

    All this Euro budget, Greece defaulting, Savile, BBC scamming and Tory/LibDumbs gossip will vanish into the thin airways from the 29th when the total UK media will be perpetually navel gazing until the New Year on the publication of the Leveson Report.

    Stephanie, please impasse this diversion into history and 'keep calm and carry on' with your excellent blogs.


Comments 5 of 237


Features & Analysis

  • Dana Lone HillDana Lone Hill

    The Native American names that break Facebook rules

  • Painting from Rothschild collectionDark arts Watch

    The 50-year fight to recover paintings looted by the Nazis

  • Mukesh SinghNo remorse

    Delhi bus rapist says victim shouldn't have fought back

  • Signposts showing the US and UK flagsAn ocean apart

    How British misunderstanding of the US is growing

From BBC Capital


  • 3D model of Christ the Redeemer statueClick Watch

    Using drones to 3D map the famous Brazilian landmark Christ the Redeemer

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.