Energy Bill: Households to fund £7.6bn green investment

 
Wind farm The Bill will mean consumers paying for cleaner energy generation

Related Stories

The government has published details of its long-awaited Energy Bill, designed to keep lights on and emissions down.

It will allow energy firms to charge households an extra £7.6bn until 2020, which will go towards the development of low-carbon electricity generation.

A decision about setting carbon emission targets for 2030 has been delayed until 2016, after the election.

Fears have been expressed about the impact on bills and whether this delay will put off investors in new plants.

Announcing the Bill, the government said: "With a fifth of the UK's electricity generating capacity due to close this decade, reforms are needed to provide certainty to investors to bring forward £110 billion investment in new infrastructure to keep the lights on and continue the shift to a diverse, low carbon economy as cheaply as possible".

Ed Davey: More "green jobs" in the UK

The independent advisory committee on climate change estimates the £7.6bn the plan allows for will add about £110 to the average household energy bill in 2020.

The Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) has a lower estimate of £95 - or a rise of 7% - although some analysts think it would be more.

DECC believes the clean energy and efficiency measures will save on bills in the long run. The Energy and Climate Change Secretary, Ed Davey, told the BBC that the measures would eventually save about the same amount.

Environmentalists condemned the bill, saying the lack of a 2030 emissions target would make it very hard to meet the UK's law on climate change.

But business groups said more needed to be done to mitigate the impact on firms of these extra costs, pointing to the loss of 900 jobs at a major energy user such as Tata Steel, as it cut back its operations in the UK.

The Energy Intensive Users Group said it supported the government's efforts to shift to cleaner energy generation "but we need to ensure that in doing so we don't undermine competitiveness of UK manufacturing internationally".

Consumer groups also expressed concern about the prospect of higher bills.

"The Treasury has generously agreed to stick the entire cost of de-carbonising UK power on to consumer bills. At the same time, they are pocketing all the money they are raising in carbon taxes," said Ed Matthew, the director of the Energy Bill Revolution campaign, arguing that this revenue should go into a major energy-efficiency programme to reduce bills.

Battleground

Details of the bill were announced late on Thursday although the Bill itself will not be published until next week.

They include:

  • Households to pay an estimated £20 next year to fund clean energy investment, rising to £95 in 2020
  • Energy companies to get £7.6bn from this to invest in low-carbon power
  • But no target for carbon emission levels by 2030
  • Longer-term emission levels to be discussed - but not necessarily set - in 2016

Crudely speaking, the bill has been a battleground between Chancellor George Osborne, who favours gas-powered generation, and the Liberal Democrats, who want clean energy.

Analysis

What the chancellor wants, the chancellor normally gets - and that's mostly what's happened in the Energy Bill.

In this case he was willing to concede that householders should pay around £100 a year extra on bills by 2020 to fund clean energy.

DECC argues that in the long term clean energy will save money because renewables and nuclear are dear to build but relatively cheap to run.

But beyond 2020 Mr Osborne has refused to commit. He doesn't think the UK should be taking a global lead on cutting emissions while competitor economies are not following. And he thinks gas may be a cheap power source in future.

So he has rejected the plan for a 2030 target for cleaning up the electricity sector. This 2030 goal is not legally binding, but it is said to be needed if the UK has a reasonable chance of meeting long-term emission targets under the Climate Change Act.

The compromises made in the battle have increased certainty for investors to create new energy infrastructure until 2020, but they have increased uncertainty beyond 2030.

Prices won't be certain either. There's a popular notion that gas will be a cheap source of power. The truth is, it's impossible to predict whether volatile gas prices in the 2020s will be cheap or expensive.

All parties will breathe a sigh of relief that this seemingly endless feud is resolved - until it comes next year to setting specific subsidies for nuclear and renewables, that is.

Follow Roger on Twitter @rogerharrabin

The chancellor is adamant that gas will help keep down power bills in the future.

Labour said this was a "humiliating failure" for the Lib Dems, who wanted gas banished from the electricity system almost entirely by 2030 to reduce CO2 emissions in line with the Climate Change Act, although gas will be needed as a back-up.

The Lib Dems believe gas prices are too volatile to be a reliable source of energy. The International Energy Agency has forecast natural gas prices to rise by 40% by 2020, even with an influx of cheap shale gas.

The Labour leader, Ed Miliband, said the government had made the wrong decision for the environment and the economy: "Instead of doing deals they should be doing the right thing by the country and the right thing by the country is to commit to carbon free electricity by 2030."

This was supported by environmental groups.

"By failing to agree to any carbon target for the power sector until after the next election, David Cameron has allowed a militant tendency within his own ranks to derail the Energy Bill," said John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace.

Confidence to invest?

The conservative chairman of the Commons' Energy Select Committee, Tim Yeo, said the lack of a target was a "significant" omission which would add to uncertainty for energy firms deciding whether to spend billions of pounds on building new power plants over the next few decades.

But one major power company, EDF Energy, which is planning to build two nuclear power stations in Somerset, said it was happy with the contents of the Bill which gave "further clarity".

"The introduction of the Energy Bill next week is a very positive step," said EDF Energy chief executive Vincent de Rivaz.

The company, in line with other major producers, said it needed to see the details of the proposals before making any commitments to build new power plants.

There are many more fragments to come in the energy jigsaw.

Decisions on the way subsidies from bills will be shared between nuclear and various renewable technologies will be made next year.

Key decisions on how to ensure there are enough gas power stations to keep the lights on when the wind is not blowing will be announced alongside the chancellor's Autumn Statement.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +123

    Comment number 520.

    Weren't we promised when the utilities companies were privatised the infrastructure would be updated? That was a quarter of a century ago. Customers have been squeezed for every penny by the energy providers who post huge profits, shouldn't those profits be used to sort it out instead of squeezing the poorer even further?

  • rate this
    +27

    Comment number 500.

    We need to reduce emissions, obviously, but the poor are already struggling to pay energy bills. How can we cope with further price increases without risking our health through not being able to heat our homes properly?

  • rate this
    +30

    Comment number 213.

    It is so important for us to lead the way in reducing our emissions, but also in creating the technology for doing so. Growing economies like those of China will continue to point out how we grew rich by exploiting carbon, but then preach to them about reducing their emissions. Our continued hypocrisy and lack of investment in green technology is strategically fatal .

    This government has failed.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 212.

    i really cant see what the hold up is, nor the lack of willing to move to green energy is...

    Keep burning gas, oil, coal.. rape the earth, choke up the air with toxic gasses, melt the ice caps, destroy wildlife, increase global warming, kill the planet, ruin further generations lives

    Use reusable energy, harness the power of the sun, wind, sea... stop the pollution, save the planet!! no brainer

  • rate this
    +106

    Comment number 202.

    They really are treating us like human cashpoints!

    We can't afford to spend money on the economical 'merry-go-round'. We tighten our belts (as we've been told to do), so they FORCE us to spend more by increasing taxes and coming up with expensive hair brained schemes that WE have NO say in. There HAS to be balance, or your people will turn

 

Comments 5 of 7

 

More Business stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

Programmes

  • Models of roads and cars on a bridgeThe Travel Show Watch

    A world in miniature - behind the scenes at one of the world’s largest model railways

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.