More red ink for Chancellor George Osborne

 

The Chancellor was able to confound the opposition last month, unveiling new borrowing forecasts which showed the deficit falling this year - against all expectations.

Today's borrowing statistics for December don't bring a lot of new information, but they are slightly worse than expected.

Despite the array of special factors helping to pull the deficit down, it wouldn't take much more bad news for Ed Balls to have the last laugh when George Osborne is forced to reveal new forecasts at the time of the Budget in March.

One piece of good news for the Chancellor: borrowing in the months before December has been revised down. But total borrowing since April is still running about 7% above the same months of 2011.

Even if the government managed to borrow the same amount in the last three months of the tax year as it did the previous year, borrowing for 2012-13 would be just under £129bn, significantly above the £121bn deficit for 2011-12.

As we know, that's not the whole story, because there are lots of one-off factors acting to pull down the final figure for 2012-13, including the Royal Mail pension fund transfer and the debt interest now being transferred to the Treasury by the Bank of England.

No progress
Credit Suisse

Excluding all of those extras, the Office for Budget Responsibility forecast in December that borrowing would fall by just over £1bn in 2012-13, to £120.3bn - and only with the help of money being raised from mobile phone operators after the auctioning the 4G spectrum.

It might. But the best that can be said, on the basis of these figures, is that it will be a very close run thing. Most independent economists in the city seem to think that borrowing will overshoot - and that Ed Balls will be able to say in March that the deficit has risen in 2012-13, after all.

So much for the political theatrics. The more important point for all of us, highlighted in a useful graph by Credit Suisse (above), is that the government has not really made any progress in cutting the deficit since the start of 2012.

The deficit reduction effort has more or less stalled, along with the broader economy. You can expect the ratings agencies to be paying nearly as much attention to this inconvenient truth as Ed Balls is.

 
Stephanie Flanders, Economics editor Article written by Stephanie Flanders Stephanie Flanders Former economics editor

So it's goodbye from me

After 11 years at the BBC, I'm leaving for a new role in the City.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 471.

    why dont these economists go out and do a proper job instead of trying to be a "poor mans " mathematician, they havn,t got a clue.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 470.

    434. fallingTP
    "You see the more power is centralsied (E.G. to Europen govt) this less our vaotes as electors matter."

    Ignoring the evidence you type faster than you think, do you actually believe there is any major difference between the three mainstream political parties in the UK? I think you do.... that is tres drole (grave and circumflex without).

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 469.

    448. fallingTP

    Heaven forbid you would stoop to insult after high-handedly berating others for doing so. That would make you a hippocrat... nope, hypoderm, nope that's not it... hypermarket, no... what is that word I am looking for?

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 468.

    I can offer a simple explanation that is understood by the man in the street.

    GEORGE OSBOURNE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING!

    He has never run a business. To him it's all theory and dogma. A textbook written by Adam Smith and edited by Margaret Thatcher. We are the victims of a vile experiment conceived in ETON and discussed over Champagne in Oxford.

    General election NOW please.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 467.

    Actually, the deficit is anything you like to claim it to be.
    That is because everyone is operating on different time horizons.
    So the government are working about 2 years ahead on the basis of their new 'reliable' forecasts.
    I'm going to see if my bank manager will accept that view.......

 

Comments 5 of 471

 

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

Programmes

  • Stranded shipThe Travel Show Watch

    Stranded in the icy Northwest Passage where only the polar bears move freely

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.