Q&A: What is tapering?

us federal reserve The US Federal Reserve has expanded its balance sheet by trillions of dollars to fight the downturn

Since late 2012, the US central bank, the Federal Reserve (or simply the Fed), has been spending $85bn a month to boost the US economy.

That is the most recent phase of quantitative easing (QE), a policy that began as a response to the financial crisis that struck in 2007.

Under the plan, the Fed has been buying assets - a mixture of US government debt and mortgage bonds. This has the effect of driving down US interest rates, including the cost of mortgages, car loans and financing for business.

But on Wednesday, the Fed announced that it was scaling back - or tapering - that support to $75bn a month.

So what is tapering anyway?

It is a gradual phasing out of the Fed's bond-buying programme.

On Wednesday, we learnt that tapering is starting in January, when the Fed will reduce purchases of mortgage bonds and Treasury bonds (US government debt) by $5bn each.

That means it will buy $35bn in mortgage bonds each month and $40bn in Treasuries.

Some say it is a small, symbolic move.

"A $10bn change won't be missed. It won't impact the economy. A change this small is almost like it had done nothing at all," said Todd Schoenberger, managing partner at Landcolt Capital.

The Fed also softened the blow, though, by saying that its benchmark short-term interest rate would remain close to zero until unemployment was "well past" 6.5%.

Further tapering will depend on how the economy responds.

Why now?

The timing surprised some analysts, who thought the Fed might wait until next year to cut back its support.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said he consulted closely with Fed Vice-Chair Janet Yellen on the decision.

Ms Yellen is due to succeed him when he steps down on 31 January after eight years in charge.

The decision to taper indicates that both are confident that the US economic recovery is well entrenched.

The latest data seems to support that. Economic growth picked up to an annual pace of 3.6% in the third quarter, surprising many observers.

Unemployment fell to a five-year low of 7% in November.

Some are not convinced, though. Steven Ricchiuto, chief economist at Mizuho in New York, was not expecting the Fed to make its move until next March.

"I am afraid that taking the punch bowl away before the party has a buzz will prove to be a mistake," he said.

How much has the Fed committed to QE?

The Fed has taken on much more government and mortgage-backed debt, that now sits on its balance sheet.

That balance sheet, which records the assets held by the central bank, has expanded dramatically.

Since the recession, it has increased from about $1 trillion before the crisis hit in 2007 to close to $4tn, and that is likely to expand further.

The majority of that expansion is due to the purchases made under QE.

To put those figures in context, the combined value of the three biggest US technology companies - Apple, Google and Microsoft - is a little over $1tn and the total value of the UK economy in 2013 was $2.4tn.

Unless there is a collapse in confidence in US government finances or the dollar, the extra debt owned by the Fed should not be a problem.

That is a lot of money. Did it work?

By buying mainly US government bonds and mortgage-backed debt, the Fed kept interest rates low - particularly those that matter most to US consumers, such as those for mortgages and car loans. Sales of new homes, as well as the rate of refinances, and car purchases all picked up in the wake of QE.

Low rates also succeeded in pushing investors to the stock market, away from bonds, whose low interest rates were even less than inflation. This has led to the strong returns in US markets, with the S&P 500 index on track for its best year since 1998.

The Fed itself said in March that the asset purchase programme had had a "meaningful" effect in easing financial conditions.

It estimates that the policy has boosted employment in the private sector by two million.

Were there any unintended consequences?

The Fed's main goal was to keep interest rates low in the US and boost economic activity at home.

But the policy encouraged investors to look overseas for assets that promised a better rate of return than US government debt.

Some of those funds are now returning home. In fact, volatility on emerging markets in 2013 has been blamed on the threat of tapering.

In June 2013, when Mr Bernanke made comments hinting that the taper was near, stock markets plunged, mortgage rates spiked and the rate of refinancing activity plummeted.

When the expected taper did not come in September 2013, many accused Mr Bernanke and his fellow central bankers of bungling the communications and capitulating to markets, who continue to want low interest rates.

More on This Story

US Economy

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

More Business stories


BBC Business Live

    ITV PROFITS 07:10:

    A strong set of numbers from broadcaster ITV this morning. Annual pre-tax profits are up 40% to £250m in the six months to 30 June compared with £179m for the same period last year.

    BARCLAYS PROFITS 07:03: Breaking News

    Barclays profit before tax is down 10% at £3.84bn.

    Iain Conn

    In all the excitement over bankers' bonuses we nearly forgot this. British Gas owner Centrica has succeeded in its pursuit of Iain Conn, confirming he will become its new chief executive from January 2015, succeeding Sam Laidlaw who is retiring. Mr Conn joins from BP where he has been chief executive, of BP's refining and marketing division,for the past seven years.

    BARCLAYS PROFITS 06:52: BBC Radio 4
    Pedestrians pass a branch of Barclays Bank in the rain in London

    Michael Hewson, chief market analyst at CMC Markets is talking to the Today programme about Barclays interim results - coming up imminently. He says the investment banking arm of Barclays is "not listening" to new boss Antony Jenkins who has been trying to clean up the bank's reputation and practices.

    Nissan car

    It's going to be a bank-heavy day today let's face it, but just to provide a break from all that, the government will be announcing changes in the law that will pave the way for driverless cars to take to Britain's roads next year. The government wants the UK to become a leader in developing the technology. In December, the Treasury said it would create a £10m prize to fund a town or city to become a testing ground for the cars.


    HSBC has told three Muslim organisations it will close their bank accounts. These are the Finsbury Park Mosque in North London, a think-tank on Islamic issues called the Cordoba Foundation based in West London, and a Muslim charity in Bolton called the Ummah Welfare Trust, which works in 20 countries giving aid. HSBC says the decisions were "absolutely not based on race and religion".

    BANKER BONUSES 06:30: Radio 5 live

    More from Ms Mangwana on Wake Up to Money. She says the proposed seven year rule may be more about changing culture in banking and the way in which bankers view their bonuses. But she also points out bonuses are generally paid in tranches that vest over a number of years, already (commonly anything between three and five years). "That's the current formula and there are [already] mechanisms to reclaim those bonuses," she says.


    In case this happened too late for you, Twitter shares rocketed 30% on stronger-than-expected financial results. Revenue more than doubled in the second quarter. Shares rose to $50 in after hours trading. Still down on its high of $74.73, hit in December.

    BANKER BONUSES 06:10: Radio 5 live

    Samantha Mangwana, employment lawyer at Slater Gordon told Wake Up to Money seven years is a long time to hold a bonus and regulators may well find it difficult to reclaim money. It is highly likely bankers will have gone and spent the money already, she says, and have nothing that the Bank of England can reclaim.

    BANKER BONUSES 06:07: BBC World News
    Tom Stephenson

    Those new rules on bankers' bonuses are expected to recommend a claw-back period of seven years. Tom Stephenson from Fidelity Worldwide on BBC World News says they could have been tougher: "One of the suggestions was that bankers could be jailed for a significant fall in profits - that's quite something isn't it. Even so, being able to claw back bonuses for seven years is pretty draconian."

    06:02: Matthew West Business Reporter

    Good morning folks. It's looking like a busy day today. We also have trading updates from ITV and house builder Taylor Wimpey. As always you can get in touch via email at bizlivepage@bbc.co.uk and on twitter @bbcbusiness

    06:00: Rebecca Marston Business reporter, BBC News

    Welcome again to the Live page. We're going to be banking heavy. There's Barclays results - in about an hour - and later this morning the Bank of England will release new restrictions on bankers' bonuses, said to be the toughest in the world. We'll see.



From BBC Capital


  • A digger operated via an Oculus Rift and a controllerClick Watch

    Why controlling a heavy digger with a virtual reality helmet might improve safety

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.