Are chancellor and governor as one on housing?

House building in Derbyshire

Here is something I may or may not have mentioned before (brain like sieve, can't remember).

The chancellor believes he got the thumbs up (in private) for his ambitious mortgage-guarantee scheme, Help to Buy, from the newish Canadian governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney.

More pertinently, George Osborne would not have pushed ahead with the plan, designed to support the provision of £130bn of new mortgages over three years, in the absence of an understanding that Carney is friend not foe on this one (or so Osborne's allies told me when he unveiled the scheme, months ago).

"Why should anyone give a stuff?" you may muse.

Well, with the UK's housing market recovering strongly in parts (London booming, North East England and Scotland still sinking), there are some who believe Osborne should think again about protecting homebuyers and banks from three quarters of the first 20% of losses on mortgages up to £570,000.

There are fears that an un-amended Help to Buy would pump up a new housing bubble, or perhaps a series of regional mini-bubbles, and will do little to stimulate the supply of new houses (although to be pedantic for a second, what we are talking up here is Help to Buy 2, launching in the new year, as opposed to Help to Buy 1, which already exists and has ushered in bumper times for house builders).

To be clear, Osborne ain't turning back on this before its official launch in January. Or so he said to me when I interviewed him last week.

Start Quote

You might be surprised how rare it is for the residents of SW1 and EC2 to sing from the same ideological hymn sheet”

End Quote

Which is why I was intrigued to be told by a colleague of Carney that the governor doesn't believe he has (in fact) underwritten the chancellor's housing market support scheme at all - and that perhaps the biggest challenge facing Carney is how to signal his distance to the world, without embarrassing and alienating his patron, George Osborne.

Now to be clear, we are in the realms here both of practical policy - how to stimulate the more general economic recovery through reviving the housing market - and of fiscal religion.

Recall please what I've mentioned a few times, that the official Treasury - the putative technocrats, not the special advisers - have a horror of Help to Buy, largely because they see it as official support, to the tune of a £12bn contingent liability for potential losses, for a market that is far too prone to bubbles to require any such de facto subsidies (and see here for more on this).

So if the civil servants don't like Help to Buy, who on earth gave birth to it? Well it was the political Treasury, the special advisers, or Spads.

Which doesn't mean that it's bad economics. It is certainly plausible - and in keeping with tradition - that the career bureaucrats of the Treasury are being too fastidiously conservative.

Mark Carney Mark Carney

But it would be nerve-wracking for Osborne to press ahead with perhaps his most ambitious economic initiative in the face of scepticism from the entire technocratic class, whether housed in SW1 (HM Treasury) or in EC2 (the Bank) - and you might be surprised how rare it is for the residents of SW1 and EC2 to sing from the same ideological hymn sheet.

Against that background, I will (in one of my more obsessive guises) be making a close textual analysis of the first statement from the Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee since Carney's accession - which is due on Wednesday.

If it raises a note of concern about an incipient housing bubble, that will be seen as a warning to Osborne to exercise due care in his stimulus for housing transactions. And if the Bank of England comes over all trappist about conditions in the homes market, questions would then be raised about whether the Bank is as self-confidently impartial as it is supposed to be.

More than any Bank governor of my lifetime, Carney is a brilliant politician. He will need all his political skills to navigate around these rocks.

Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

How Labour pays for student fee cut

Labour would reduce tax relief for those earning £150,000 or more a year, shrink maximum pension pots to £1m and cut maximum annual pension contributions to £30,000 to pay for a cut to £6,000 in student fees.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Robert


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 273.


    Voting Tory is not going to change anything, mass immigration is a fact of life for any developed nation, rents will continue to only go in one direction - Upwards.

  • rate this

    Comment number 272.

    The government appear to be serious about easing the housing shortage, it's getting easier to convert commercial property into residential. But more could be done by way of investment and support for projects to convert deserted town centres into housing.

  • rate this

    Comment number 271.

    Sally the contrarian @269
    "The perfect prescription"

    You are motoring, as usual, on liberty, an excellent fuel that will give drive for your comments into infinity, even in lack of adequate definition.

    You pick-up on my mention of 'not too much corporate cheating', but as usual miss the means to preclude such, and to secure democracy, namely our equal liberty in equal partnership.

    Think on it?

  • rate this

    Comment number 270.


    I just meant as an example of house prices being unnecessarily high, and the reason I say so is because we got our house at a more reasonable price because the inheritors selling it were sympathetic to us as a young couple just starting out. Such kindness is rare, but when a house is lying dormant and people are struggling to buy, there is no reason why prices need to be high.

  • rate this

    Comment number 269.

    267.All for All
    The perfect prescription, liberty. Given of course... not too much of corporate cheating!
    Businesses can only 'cheat' us if either:
    Government doesn't enforce Fraud; or
    Government passes anti-competitive laws, regulating competition and choice to the consumer out of our market place, protecting their big businesses pals literally at our expense.


Comments 5 of 273


Features & Analysis

From BBC Capital


  • BatteriesClick Watch

    More power to your phone - the lithium-ion batteries that could last twice as long

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.