Why the chancellor wants China to invest in UK nuclear

 

Part of what has been holding back the development of new nuclear power plants in the UK is their enormous cost.

The government is refusing to finance these hugely pricey projects directly - although it will allow the owners of any new nuclear generators to charge well above the current market price for any power they produce in years and decades to come, so that the billions in development and construction costs can be recouped.

The big attraction for the chancellor of allowing Chinese companies to invest in Britain's nuclear industry is that they have deep pockets.

On his current trip to China, he has told the biggest Chinese nuclear companies they will in future even be able to own controlling stakes in British power stations, and not just small minority shares.

When you think about the history of nuclear power, it may be shocking to some that businesses and investors from Britain - whose scientists and engineers were pioneers in this technology in the early days - will not own the new generation of nuclear power plants, and they may instead belong to China's nuclear power giants (as well as to the French and Japanese).

The first of these deals with Chinese interests is expected to come next week, when the formal go ahead is expected for the construction of a new £14bn plant at the Hinkley C site in Somerset.

This project will be led by the French state-controlled giant, EdF, which has been looking for a partner or partners to share the costs.

I am told that EdF has been negotiating with three nuclear giants, CGN, CNNC and SNPTC. One or two of these is likely to end up owning perhaps 30% of Hinkley C.

George Osborne has met the bosses of all three of these companies, to give them comfort that he is keen for them to invest in British nuclear in general, and in Hinkley C in particular.

Hinkley C's technology will be French, that of Areva. And the capital, the money, will be French, and - it now turns out - probably Chinese too.

 
Robert Peston, economics editor Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

This column...

This column may be a bit quiet for a bit, because I am away from the office.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 338.

    337 martyn:

    You are right it is all about money and we have not got any Labour spent it all on welfare and ne'er do wells

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 337.

    There are a few comments on here saying that Britain was at the forefront of expertise in nuclear energy (which I don't dispute) but that it's expertise no longer exists. My questions would be.
    1. How did Britain's expertise get to the forefront in the first place?
    2. If it got to the forefront before, why can't it get there again?
    3. Is it all just about money?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 336.

    Are the Tories trying to turn us into a corrupt third world nation, with a rich elite lording it over powerless masses.
    We are pawning the family silver for very little gain. I can't see any cheap power for the public either as promised by Osborne.
    If they get in again the NHS is next!

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 335.

    yet another foreign power that can scr*w the UK consumer ?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 334.

    blackie@319
    'bigger than the US'
    Rejoice, rejoice?
    Those investments are private, highest rewards for those who most 'can afford to lose', wider benefit for those whose 'earnings' allowed them not just to 'save safely', but take diversified foreign-investment risk, directly or in 'high value' pension funds. The 'equality issue' is not of 'adolescent envy', but of adult corruption. Trust irrational

 

Comments 5 of 338

 

Features & Analysis

From BBC Capital

Programmes

  • Traffic lightsClick Watch

    From hacking cars to traffic lights - behind the scenes at a cyber-security conference

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.