Co-op could phase out Labour support

 
Co-op bank branch Co-op Group profits have been wiped-out by its bank's losses

When Co-op Bank collapsed into losses, and was instructed by the regulator to raise £1.5bn of new capital as a protection against future shocks, most attention was inevitably focused on the pain being experienced by the bank's big creditors.

But the damage from the banking debacle extends further than losses for those who own £1.3bn of the bank's bonds and preference shares.

There is actual and potential hurt for the bank's owner, the Co-operative Group, its seven million members and the institutions that depend on the support of the Co-op, including the Labour Party.

First, and perhaps obviously, Co-op cannot pay a dividend to members this year, because the dividend is a share of profits, and Co-op Bank's losses have tipped the entire group into losses: no profits means no dividend.

Just in the first half of the year, Co-op Group incurred a loss of £559m, and it will also be seriously in the red for the year as a whole.

That will deprive Co-op members of the £50m to £70m they've received in recent years.

Fairly generous

Co-op Group will offer them money-off vouchers in the run up to Christmas. These sound fairly generous, a rolling programme of 10 per cent off bills between mid-November and Christmas.

But such loyalty discounts are bound to be offered by all the big supermarket groups. There is nothing terribly Co-op-ish about in-store money off deals.

Also, if there's no dividend, that puts at risk the millions Co-op members pay to local charities by opting to transfer their dividend entitlement to Co-op Group's Community Fund: last year good causes received £3.2m in this way.

Well, Co-op Group has decided that the incompetence of its bank should not impose hardship on these charities, so it will continue to pay the £3.2m or so out of group resources.

Then there is the wholly separate political donations that Co-op Group makes, which were £1.2m last year and which supports the Co-operative Party - which in turn is affiliated to the Labour Party.

This £1.2m can be seen as largely, but not wholly, supporting Labour - especially 30-ish MPs who call themselves Labour Co-operative MPs. They include the shadow chancellor, Ed Balls.

For this year, the political contribution has been reduced to £1m.

Members surveyed

And I am told it could disappear altogether - in time.

The reason is that Co-op Group is embarking on a detailed survey of its 7m members to find out what they expect of the Co-op, and how it should change to meet their needs.

Euan Sutherland, the group's chief executive, tells me that they will be asked whether it is appropriate that their money should continue to be used to support Labour.

He concedes it is by no means certain they will say yes.

Labour's leader, Ed Miliband, cannot really complain that Co-op Group is asking the question, since he has already announced plans for union members to opt in to providing funds to his party, rather than having to opt out, as at present.

But if that million quid a year were to become de minimis, that would intensify a funding squeeze for Labour - which is already squeezing the pips till they squeak, as a former Labour chancellor might put it.

 
Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Richer at last?

How significant is today's confirmation that earnings are at last rising faster than inflation?

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Robert

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 83.

    81.jgm2

    "Tories and Labour are equally useless and incompetent"

    Precisely!

    Though that begs the question of course - do any of them deserve another turn?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 82.

    This thread is going to last longer than the Co-op Bank will ....

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 81.

    78 ComradeOgilvy

    'Which party is paying mothers to breast feed?'

    And how will it be monitored?

    It's as ridiculous as paying children to go to school and they got rid of that stupid idea.

    Tories and Labour are equally useless and incompetent but that doesn't mean we should reward Labour with another turn any time soon.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 80.

    @72. toast
    "What I would like to see is companies who make donations, requiring shareholder permission, of say 50%+ made into law."

    Shareholder permission (by member resolution) has been required since 2001, although a strict majority is not required, just a larger share of the vote in favour than against.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 79.

    A couple of thoughts. Firstly, I have never understood all the fuss about TCB providing banking services to Labour. After all, all political parties have banking facilities, so why should Labour be any different? Secondly, if Co-op shops are too expensive, shop somewhere else...it's as simple as that...!

 

Comments 5 of 83

 

Features & Analysis

From BBC Capital

Programmes

  • Models of roads and cars on a bridgeThe Travel Show Watch

    A world in miniature - behind the scenes at one of the world’s largest model railways

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.