The big Co-op question for regulators

 
Co-op supermarket trolleys

Here is the big question that city regulators need to answer over their failure to spot how over-stretched and frail Co-op Bank had become.

Or to put it another way, here is a central issue for the independent enquiry to be ordered by George Osborne.

In April of 2012, the Financial Services Authority - precursor of today's Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority - told Co-op Group that it did not have appropriate management skills and that Co-op Bank had too little capital to be allowed to fulfil its ambition of becoming much bigger by buying more than 600 branches from Lloyds.

I know this, because a senior person at the FSA briefed me about his and his colleagues' serious concerns. You can read the detail of the FSA's instructions to Co-op Group here.

Put in a nutshell, the FSA told Co-op Group to decide whether its future was in banking or in supermarkets. And the presumption at the FSA was that Co-op would choose to stick with supermarkets, and that therefore the takeover of those branches would not happen, that the deal had been killed.

However, just three months later, Lloyds and Co-op Group announced precisely the opposite - that Co-op Group had emerged as the preferred new owner of the branches, in a £750m deal.

And the chancellor of the exchequer, no less, hailed the planned massive expansion of Co-op Bank as "creating a new banking system for Britain that gives real choice to customers and supports the economy".

Start Quote

What is relevant is that the FSA did not stop Co-op Bank careering towards the edge of the cliff”

End Quote

George Osborne added: "The sale of hundreds of Lloyds branches to the Co-operative creates a new challenger bank and promotes mutuals."

Now for the avoidance of doubt, between April and July, Co-op Group had done none of the things demanded by the FSA.

The bank had not raised any additional capital. And Co-op Group continued to be run by a retailer, Peter Marks, not a banker.

So why did the FSA allow the Co-op Bank continue to chunter down the track towards this proposed massive expansion?

And perhaps more importantly, since the FSA had conspicuous doubts about the Co-op Group's competence in banking, why didn't it follow up those doubts - which would have uncovered how stretched bank management really was, how an expensive IT project was going seriously awry and how vast numbers of loans were going bad?

It is almost irrelevant that in April 2013, the deal to buy those Lloyds branches was called off.

What is relevant is that the FSA did not stop Co-op Bank careering towards the edge of the cliff.

For what its worth, senior FSA people have told me that their reluctance to be more aggressive with Co-op Bank is because of their perception that the Treasury and MPs from both parties wanted Co-op to become much bigger and more powerful.

What was this perception based on?

Did the Chancellor or the Treasury tell the FSA to make the deal happen?

Presumably this can't be the case, because if it was, George Osborne would be signing his own execution by ordering an investigation into all this.

Perhaps more likely is that the FSA simply didn't have the backbone to go against the prevailing political mood, that co-ops and mutuals were a good thing, and needed to be promoted.

Ironically, by not making sure Co-op Bank kept to the straight and narrow, the FSA has succeeded in tainting all mutuals, even the better-run ones.

And it has left Co-op Bank battered and enfeebled, undermining competition and choice for consumers.

 
Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Are Scotland's new tax and spending powers fair?

Possibly the most important economic decisions relating to Scotland's new powers, on the size of the grant Scotland will receive in future and how much it can borrow, are yet to be taken.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Robert

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 242.

    This is a standard at 'the top' case of 'knowing the right people'. A guy with only a smidge of very minor bank experience at all is given the top job? Only by friends in the 'right place'. This couldn't have occurred any other way. The whole 'regulator' is just another bunch of 'friends' of those in charge of the banks, so of course no questions are raised.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 241.

    239 Nothing has been fixed. All the insane cross dependencies & interbank trading are as complex and opaque as ever. One or two start sliding and they all swirl down the plug together - they've shunted huge losses onto the taxpayers of the west but are still left with giant quantities of bad assets - notably commercial property.

    Their hireling politicians will keep kicking the can with low rates

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 240.

    227.J_f_H
    211.U2
    You seem to think all is well with the banking system.
    ~
    If you had read & understood my posts of the last 6/7/8yrs you would know that 1. I do not, & 2. every now&then I have pointed out either where flaws lie or that there are probably more to be discovered.

    Suggest u post less read & understand more. :-)

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 239.

    235.ComradeOgilvy
    Not "almost all banks" are teetering. The banks that were strong before the crisis are still strong. The ones in difficulty are slowly trying to repair their balance sheets. None of this has anything to do with size and bank's balance sheets have shrunk significantly since the crash.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 238.

    236.FauxGeordie "New names appearing on here all of a sudden. Interesting."

    I had clocked that too.

    Interesting that they are the apologists for the status quo ante - and in one case even a pretend UK resident - actually Swiss. I can't help feeling that the banks are running scared again that the blogs are getting closer to the rotten truth at the core of their legally permitted economic lunacy.

 

Comments 5 of 242

 

Features & Analysis

  • Prostitute in red light district in Seoul, South KoreaSex for soldiers

    How Korea helped prostitutes work near US military bases


  • LuckyDumped

    The rubbish collector left on the scrap heap as his city cleans up


  • A woman gets a Thanksgiving meal at a church in FergusonFamily fears

    Three generations in Ferguson share Thanksgiving reflections


  • Canada joins TwitterTweet North

    Canada's self-deprecating social media feed


From BBC Capital

Programmes

  • All-inclusive holidaysThe Travel Show Watch

    With all-inclusive holidays seeing a resurgence are local trades missing out to big resorts?

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.