Housing: Recovery or boom?

Mortgage application form

Figures from the Bank of England show there were 71,638 mortgage approvals for house purchases in December, a smallish 1.1% rise on the month but 29% more than a year earlier.

And the value of mortgages approved rose 8.8% to £12.4bn compared with November - and versus a year ago, the rise was an impressive 53%.

So, banks are definitely lending more, and we appear to have regained our appetite for house purchases.

The Chancellor's and Bank of England's assorted schemes for encouraging the banks to lend more - Funding for Lending and the two versions of Help to Buy - are having an impact.

And with housing construction up sharply, and purchases of consumer durables and housing-related financial services also on the up, this jump in the market is making an important contribution to the economic recovery.

But is there cause to fear that a dangerous and unstoppable boom is in the making?

Start Quote

The risk of future house-price falls may rest more with people than with banks... Which, many would say, is probably how it should be. ”

End Quote

House prices are rising sharply: according to the Nationwide, the price of a typical home this month was almost 9% higher than a year ago, and there have been 13 successive monthly price rises.

And what may be a concern is that these rises are taking place when the ratio of house prices to earnings remains well above the long-term average.

The most vulnerable group of purchasers is probably first-time buyers. And, according to the Nationwide, a typical first-time buyer home costs 4.6 times average earnings, compared with a 20-year average of 3.6 (although below the 2007 boom-year peak of 5.4).


The worry would be that first time buyers - and others - are taking on huge debts just as we enter a cycle of rising interest rates after years of almost free money (although the Governor of the Bank of England says he is confident that when the price of money rises, it will be to an interest rate well below the norms of the '90s and the early years of this century).

So, apart from the potential for individual hardship if the affordability of mortgages becomes more challenging, are there risks to financial stability from what's going on?

Not yet.

Remember that the high loan-to-value mortgages are being guaranteed by the Treasury, under the two help-to-buy schemes. So if there are loan losses, the bulk of these losses will fall on taxpayers (yuk, perhaps).

More germanely, for all the recovery in mortgage lending, it remains much lower than in the boom years.

So December's £12.4bn of mortgage approvals compares with a peak of £17.9bn in November 2006 and with monthly mortgage promises of around £16bn on average in the two years before a vital course of finance for banks disappeared in August 2007 with the immolation of the market for mortgage-backed bonds.

Changed structure

As for the number of mortgage approvals, they remain massively less than what was typical in the 15 years before the crash.

From 1993 to 2003, monthly mortgage approvals were always in the range of 80,000 a month to 125,000 a month, well above the numbers provided today.

And in the 25 months before the market died, average monthly approvals were 116,000, 62% greater than in December.

All that said, the structure of the housing market has changed a bit: there are proportionately more cash buyers.

So, according to HMRC, there were 108,000 house purchases in December, almost 40,000 more than the number of mortgage approvals.

Which means that the risk of future house-price falls may rest more with people than with banks than in previous cycles. Which, many would say, is probably how it should be.

Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

How Labour pays for student fee cut

Labour would reduce tax relief for those earning £150,000 or more a year, shrink maximum pension pots to £1m and cut maximum annual pension contributions to £30,000 to pay for a cut to £6,000 in student fees.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Robert


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 206.

    205 JfH

    I'm turning Japanese
    I think I'm turning Japanese
    I really think so
    Turning Japanese
    I think I'm turning Japanese
    I really think so

    Property boom and bust and ZIRP following help the Japanese

    I am still stunned that having witnessed the Japanese experience the West didnt not learn from it

    And it is arguable that Japan has a better technology mix than the UK

  • rate this

    Comment number 205.

    203.Arthur Daley more..

    QE and zero rates were always going to make things worse and not better.

    All QE is doing is to prevent the restructuring. This just inevitably delays any hope of a real recovery.

    All they can possibly do is delay, but the bankrupt will stay bankrupt, unless they are restructured in bankruptcy.

    Wasn't QE a wonderful idea!

  • rate this

    Comment number 204.

    203.Arthur Daley

    But QE was always going to end and it was always going to be recovered (and interest rates were always going to rise.)

    The consequences for the economy were/are always going to happen.

    Both of the above statements are irrefutably true.

    So how long and what are the consequences?

    long: 20 to 30 years.
    consequences: rapid decline in asset prices, bust banks, a few repos.

  • rate this

    Comment number 203.

    198. Tim Browning

    '.dissolution of paper debt (QE).

    Private sector housebuilding was decimated (Down 60%) in the recession, the government is right to fix it'

    Construction sector, have a family member in it.

    QE was needed to plug hole in tax revenue, figures a good match

    QE therefore will go when no hole, when will that be

    Like stimulants for zombie

    Lot of 'up' talk due, income trend down

  • rate this

    Comment number 202.

    201 U2S

    I have no doubt as to your good intent

    I am aware of the interconnectivity - that was the whole basis of the credit crunch

    You basically are going on about risk, which is why governance is important & why penalty should be excercised. Increased interconnectivity simply demands more oversight not less

    PS Why do you think the housing market is being tickled up, at this time. What outcome


Comments 5 of 206


Features & Analysis

From BBC Capital


  • A robot holding a table legClick Watch

    The robots who build flat-pack furniture - teaching machines to work collaboratively

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.