The curious case of China's falling yuan

A 100-yuan banknote against the background of a US dollar sign China's central bank is probably reminding traders that the yuan is not a one-way bet

The Chinese currency has had its biggest one-day fall, down nearly 1%, and has fallen 1.5% for the past week and a half. It is the biggest decline since 2005 when it introduced its new currency regime and moved away from a tight peg against the US dollar.

Dropping to 6.1 yuan to the dollar, the currency has broken a long-term trend of appreciation. Recall that it had been around 8 yuan to the dollar in 1994 when the exchange rate was set up.

The Chinese central bank, the People's Bank of China (PBOC), is right in that these are not big moves in the foreign exchange market. In a statement, the PBOC says this volatility is normal for other economies so there's "no need to over-interpret it."

But since the Chinese currency is controlled by the central bank to move within a narrow band of 1% around a daily fix and isn't convertible, the breaking of a steady trend will be viewed as a signal.

So what is the central bank signalling? Probably that the yuan isn't a one-way bet, meaning that the currency can fall as well as rise. It matters in that if traders expect the currency to always rise, then they will increase demand for the yuan that produces the intended effect.

As China wants to control the pace of appreciation, it ends up having to intervene to buy dollars and there's not a huge appetite to buy even more dollars as China holds rather a lot already.

Long-run value

There's also appreciation pressure from the demand for yuan as capital continues to flow into China, despite slowing growth, or perhaps because of it, since investors seem to like steadier and more balanced growth.

By demonstrating, or rather orchestrating, that the currency can fall as well as rise, the central bank is trying to show the currency isn't a one-way bet, since that can be self-fulfilling.

Start Quote

Reading the tea leaves, a bit of volatility is likely what the Chinese central bank is after”

End Quote

The central bank may also see the yuan as being close to its equilibrium value, so there shouldn't be too much upward pressure or the currency could end up being over-valued and that would hurt exports.

Of course, it's not possible to say what the long-run value is due to a number of reasons; China has no market-clearing interest rate (it has several benchmark lending and deposit rates), the currency isn't tradable across China's borders, and inflation isn't well-measured.

So it's difficult to make what economists call purchasing power parity (PPP) estimations, that essentially says that goods should eventually cost the same across countries, so exchange rates offset pricing differences. Well, that's hard to work out for most countries which is why the short-run exchange rate can be volatile.

Reading the tea leaves, a bit of volatility is probably what the Chinese central bank is after. The internationalisation of the yuan is underway where the Chinese currency is now traded in offshore hubs such as London.

According to the global transaction services organisation, SWIFT, the yuan is already the seventh most-traded currency in the world, after the highly liquid top six currencies, rising quickly in just a couple of years. And this is without it being tradable or convertible.

So the exchange rate reforms are gaining speed. The PBOC has a plan to allow the currency to be liberalised within the decade, and the Shanghai free trade zone is experimenting with allowing the yuan to be traded.

Steady rise

For these reforms to work, they wouldn't want speculators to push up the value of the currency, so the PBOC is flexing its muscles to show that it is in control and what it wants is for the currency to move up as well as down.

It is hard to bet against a central bank - whether it's the Chinese or the Swiss. But for now, most economists still expect that the yuan will continue its steady rise as the economy continues to grow.

The PBOC could find that it is working against the fundamentals of the economy so it probably won't try and depreciate the currency by much, but it is well able to intervene and make it move up and down on a daily basis.

Linda Yueh Article written by Linda Yueh Linda Yueh Chief business correspondent

China’s noblesse oblige

A record 290 new billionaires have joined the ranks of the richest in the world. Of these, a quarter of the newcomers were from China.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Linda


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 47.

    Chinese government was buying US Dollars so it kept their currency low and therefore their exports were cheap and imports expensive.

    It was done to increase internal manufacturing. They have done this for 10+ years.

    The Chinese have a tremendous supply of low cost worforce with no health and safety regualtion to worry about so no wonder they are killing the "developed" world's manufacturing.

  • rate this

    Comment number 46.

    41. nametheguilty
    Agree with you. They build cities with no people, houses no one can afford, roads with no cars, airports with no planes.

    The world no longer wants its increasingly expensive mass produced tat. They have a huge demographic problem and furthermore since the official Chinese figures are undoubtedly fiddled it may well be much worse there than anyone yet knows.

  • rate this

    Comment number 45.

    @41. nametheguilty
    "China is a basket case. They have made exactly the same mistake as the US and UK, and earlier in Japan, in allowing a debt fuelled property boom get out of hand."

    That they have. However it's countered by the amount of foreign debt they've bought/are owed. They've offset a housing boom/bust with hedging in other countries' debts. It's not as if nobody owes them a bob or two.

  • rate this

    Comment number 44.

    @28. Christopher Evans
    "UK is not yet (legally at least) a colony of the UK"


    "So why is the RMB-USD exchange rate used in this article?"

    One is, for better or worse, a global reserve currency. The other is the currency in which a not insignificant of manufactured products are primarily traded before the open market.

    So why not?

  • rate this

    Comment number 43.

    Effort appreciated for understanding (mechanism & motive) in 'control' & 'playing' of currency markets, in too limited sense 'ours'. As from one of Ernie's plays (all the right words) we are left with Sir Algernon @33 (poker (&) tax a back-up) & as Knut implies @29, need to recruit those with 'solid experience' to work for the human race, only possible with universally agreed equal partnership.


Comments 5 of 47


Features & Analysis

From BBC Capital


  • Former al-Qaeda double agent Aimen DeanHARDtalk Watch

    Islamic State is about revenge says former al-Qaeda member turned spy Aimen Dean

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.