The Co-op Bank and Labour - looking at a divorce

 
Sign on building reads "The Co-operative"

One person who must be heartily sick of the woes at Co-op Bank is Ed Miliband.

When it was revealed by the Mail on Sunday that the former bank chairman, Paul Flowers, faced allegations of drug taking it was not long before the Labour Party was dragged into the row.

The Co-operative Party joined Labour in the 1920s and around 30 MPs are still officially Labour and Co-operative Party members, including the shadow chancellor, Ed Balls. The Co-op Group - the onetime owner of Co-op Bank which now retains a 30% stake - is a Labour Party donor, although it has been reported that its support of up to £850,000 a year is under review. Co-op Group's public consultation on its strategy asked if it was appropriate for "big business" to donate to political parties. Some Co-op members believed it was loaded to get the answer "no".

For the bank, the direction is clear. Niall Booker, the chief executive who arrived from HSBC on a rescue mission following its near collapse, has said privately that he wants the bank to be apolitical. In its annual report released earlier this month the bank pointedly said that it "made no political donations". Its affinity card division - credit cards that provide support for charities and Labour and the Liberal Democrats - is being wound down.

Ed Balls Ed Balls is one of several Labour and Co-operative Party MPs

Co-op Bank now puts support for housing associations and local authorities in the "non-core" part of its business (in other words, parts of the bank it is interested in running down or exiting). Internally, some consider that providing banking for a political party should fall under the same heading.

The present relationship with Labour runs deep. The bank itself has made £34m of loans to the party since 1992 according to Electoral Commission figures. It was reported last year that it had a £3.9m overdraft facility, although party sources say that is no longer the case. What it does have are £1.1m of outstanding loans.

Both sides are now looking to part company. I am told that Labour is already seeking to move its loans from the Co-op to the Unity Trust Bank which is largely owned and run by the trade union movement. Co-op Bank does have a 28% stake in Unity Trust, a stake it is looking to sell. With pre-emption rights, the trade unions could decide to take over the whole bank.

Once Labour has moved the loans, any other banking relations would quickly follow and Labour would no longer bank with the Co-op. And so would end a significant bit of history. When I asked Labour how long they had banked with the Co-op they admitted that the relationship was so ancient no one was old enough to remember.

Labour has had its own problems with financing, facing a £25m debt problem in 2006. It has clawed that figure back to £4.5m and is looking to wipe out its debts by the middle of next year. It already has a £1.1m loan with Unity Trust and consolidating that with the Co-op debt could well make commercial sense.

There is something for both sides in any divorce. Mr Miliband would be pleased that any mention of the Co-op Bank no longer came attached to questions about its relationship with his party. Co-op Bank, now 70% owned by American institutions, could focus on its two core targets - individual customer accounts and small business lending. I am told that both sides would be more than satisfied with such an outcome.

 
Kamal Ahmed Article written by Kamal Ahmed Kamal Ahmed Business editor

Tesco, Sainsbury’s – the bad news just keeps coming

Regulatory inquiries and tough trading make gloomy reading for retail giants

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Kamal

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 97.

    The Economist isn't impartial for goodness sake. And how can a Tory economist's article be a poor reference? Especially when he backed up what he was saying with incontrovertible evidence.

    There was no money left because of the financial crash caused by the rich and their banking institutions, not Labour. You didn't read the article did you?! You just want to believe what you want to, not facts.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 96.

    Of course, if you search the internet you can find someone agreeing with you. If you want someone to criticise the Tories look at Guardian or Huffington Post. Try somewhere impartial like the Economist.
    The commitments include a large number of extra civil servant, addition to Housing Benefit etc.
    Remember the note 'there is no money left'. I am old enough to remember Harold Wilson's govt

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 95.

    93.Wiltshire_Lad "The previous government took on enormous commitments which the country cannot afford but are difficult to get out of."

    What were those then? Nice article I linked to wasn't it? Hopefully stop the Tory lies and distortions.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 94.

    91.Wiltshire_Lad
    The point I was countering was the lies told by Tory posters about how we ended up in this mess. This article by a Tory shows that I am right to counter such distortions... http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ramesh-patel/growth-cameron-austerity_b_2007552.html

    Are you sure the debt was 800 billion in May 2010? I think we should have done what Obama did.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 93.

    90.0racle
    And you are just being semantic rather than helpful.
    ===

    you mean that I think you should use the correct word?
    The previous government took on enormous commitments which the country cannot afford but are difficult to get out of.

 

Comments 5 of 97

 

Features & Analysis

  • Cerro RicoSatanic mines

    Devil worship in the tunnels of the man-eating mountain


  • Nefertiti MenoeWar of words

    The woman who sparked a row over 'speaking white'


  • Oil pumpPump change

    What would ending the US oil export ban do to petrol prices?


  • Brazilian Scene, Ceara, in 1893Sir Snapshot

    19th Century Brazil seen through the eyes of an Englishman


From BBC Capital

Programmes

  • European Union's anti-terrorism chief Gilles de KerchoveHARDtalk Watch

    Anti-terrorism chief Gilles de Kerchove on the threat from returning Islamic State fighters

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.