Regulated rail fares to increase by 3.5% in 2015

 

Martin Abrams, Campaign for Better Transport: "Balance between subsidy and fare payer gone too far"

Related Stories

Regulated rail fares will rise by 3.5% from January next year, following the release of July's inflation figures.

Under the formula, average fares in England are due to go up by July's RPI measure of inflation, plus 1%.

RPI - the Retail Prices Index - was 2.5% last month, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Labour accused the government of 'ripping off' passengers, but the government defended the rise.

Regulated fares - about half the total - have increased by more than the rate of inflation in most years since 2004.

Such fares include season tickets, "anytime" single tickets around major cities, and off-peak inter-city return tickets.

But under a "flex" rule, train companies can raise fares by 2% above the average, as long as the overall average stays at RPI plus 1%.

As a result, some fares could increase by 5.5% next year.

graphic
line
Analysis: Richard Westcott, Transport correspondent

The original point behind regulating around half of our rail fares was to protect the public from big price rises.

The government was meant to keep costs down on tickets where people don't have much of an alternative but to go by train. Like commuter season tickets for example.

But for more than a decade ministers have actually used the regulation system to increase prices by more than inflation (apart from this year, when they only went up by RPI). The reason? They want passengers to pay a bigger share of the bill to run our trains, so that taxpayers pay less.

In short, it looks like prices will keep going up for some years yet.

line
'More to do'

Labour said it would abolish the flex rule, and accused David Cameron of failing to stand up for working people.

"He's allowed train companies to sting passengers with inflation-busting fare rises of over 20% since 2010, costing them hundreds of pounds," said Mary Creagh, the shadow transport minister.

This year -2014- the government capped fare rises to keep them in line with inflation. But it is not known whether the same will happen in 2015.

Claire Perry, rail minister: "People are getting an unprecedented investment in the railway"

Passenger Focus, which represents rail users, wants the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, to consider blocking the full rise.

"We hope the government will step in again as it did last year, to ensure that train fares in England do not rise above the rate of inflation," said David Sidebottom, the director of Passenger Focus.

Graph showing rail fares compared with RPI

Treasury Minister David Gauke said Mr Osborne will decide whether to do so before the end of the year.

"That is a decision that has still to be made, and that's something the chancellor will consider," he told the BBC.

In the meantime the Department for Transport defended the planned rise.

"We fully recognise there's more to do to bring down the cost of rail travel in Britain," said Transport Secretary Patrick Mcloughlin.

"But we need to do it responsibly and we can't spend money we don't have," he said.

'Phenomenal growth'

So far, the 3.5% rise applies only to fares in England.

Train passengers give their reaction to the rises

In Scotland, there will be no rise in off-peak fares in 2015, which have been frozen since January 2013.

Peak fares will rise by 2.5% - the same as the July inflation rate.

The Welsh government has yet to make a decision - but it usually mirrors the rise in England.

But continuing rises above the rate of inflation are a clear part of the UK government's strategy.

Since a white paper published under Labour in 2007, it is committed to reducing public subsidies for the railways, and transferring more of the cost to passengers.

Labour's Mary Creagh: It's the problem of both government and railway firms

At the same time it wants to encourage investment.

Michael Roberts, director general of the industry body, the Rail Delivery Group, said that although rail fares had increased above inflation for a decade, the number of passengers had seen "phenomenal growth".

"Compared with fifteen years ago, we're now carrying twice as many passengers as we did then," he said. But he added that rail services were partly a "victim of that success" because there was now overcrowding on some major services.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +15

    Comment number 1145.

    I would not mind the increase if I actually saw the improvement they say they keep spending it on (and my salary was to match the increase). If anything it has gotten worse.

    Instead of HS2, cap the rise and spend the £50bn on improvements to the network.

  • rate this
    -31

    Comment number 916.

    I work in a town without a railway station. I have to travel to work by car as no buses run at times of my shifts. My taxes help to pay for rail commuters to get to work. What help do I get, none! Rail commuters want it both ways, well paid jobs in the big cities but subsidised travel costs. The greed is not from the railways companies, or the Government, it's from subsidised commuters.

  • rate this
    -11

    Comment number 907.

    Why is it that so many people expect the Govt to subsidise rail? They don't subsidise my car (quite the opposite in fact) and they don't subsidise my plane travel. Why should rail be any different? If you don't like paying so much for the train then don't use it, work nearer to home or get to work some other way. It's not up to others to subsidise your choices.

  • rate this
    +58

    Comment number 328.

    Services haven't improved and neither the staff, still trains are late for any reason possible and still I need to pay more to receive the same shoddy service.

  • rate this
    +29

    Comment number 247.

    The only way we'd get the real competition on the railways that would bring down prices (which should be the aim of privatisation) would be if several competing companies owned and ran different carriages on the same train. Then we'd see something!

 

Comments 5 of 11

 

More Business stories

RSS

Features

From BBC Capital

Programmes

  • Suspension bridge connecting mountain peaksThe Travel Show Watch

    Must-see global events including walking the first suspension bridge to connect mountain peaks

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.