Grammar school: Kent County Council backs expansion plan

 

Critics say selective schools actually reduce parental choice

Related Stories

Kent County Council has voted to allow a grammar school to expand onto a new site.

The decision is likely to lead to the first major expansion of a grammar school in England for half a century.

The law in England forbids the opening of any new grammar schools, but recent changes allow them - and other popular schools - to expand.

Critics accuse the government of "expanding selection by the back door".

England has 164 grammar schools and there are 68 in Northern Ireland.

Academic selection and grammar schools were abolished in most areas of England in the 1960s and 70s.

But some areas retained them - including Buckinghamshire, Kent and Trafford. In other areas, there are individual grammar schools. Children have to pass the 11-plus exam to get in.

In 1998, Labour banned the opening of any new grammar schools, but recent changes to the Admissions Code - the rules schools have to follow when allocating places - allow oversubscribed schools to expand beyond their boundaries.

'Parental demand'

In Kent, parents in the Sevenoaks area set up an online petition to campaign for such an expansion, arguing that this was the only part of the county without a grammar school.

ANALYSIS

Grammar schools in England are small in number but they inspire a lot of passion, and a decision by Kent to allow this kind of expansion could be a turning point.

It will also reignite a fierce debate.

Opponents say they divide children in to "sheep and goats" at 11 through the 11-plus exam, which they have to pass to get a place, and that schools around them suffer. Supporters say they are beacons of excellence which help children achieve their potential - and that academically bright pupils are best taught together.

The issue is politically sensitive too.

Labour opposes academic selection but did not abolish grammar schools while in government. Instead it said the issue should be decided by ballots of local parents - but the process was involved and expensive and only one case was brought, which did not succeed.

In 2007, David Cameron risked a backbench rebellion when he dropped the party's pledge to build more grammar schools as he sought to modernise the party.

Now the way is becoming more open for grammars to expand. Some say Education Secretary Michael Gove has produced an "elegant political solution", but critics call it a "backdoor expansion".

New grammar school battles

They say more than 1,100 pupils who have passed the 11-plus have to travel for an hour to Tunbridge Wells to their nearest grammar school.

Now Kent County Council has voted to press ahead with plans to set up a "satellite school" in Sevenoaks linked to existing grammar schools in Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells.

The new "satellite school" would take in 120 pupils in a year.

The National Grammar School Association says many other grammars would like to expand. Jennie Varley, vice chairman of the group said: "This is excellent news.

"It's what the parents in Sevenoaks wanted and they put together a great campaign. This may now encourage other grammar schools to do the same."

'Back door'

Labour's education spokesman Stephen Twigg has accused the government of "sneaking in changes" and "expanding selection by the back door".

"We should not divide children at 11," he told MPs earlier this year.

A Department for Education spokesman said on Thursday: "The overriding objective of this government's reforms is to increase the supply of good school places so parents have real choice.

"That includes making it easier for good schools - grammar or otherwise - to increase their published admission number.

"Legislation prohibits the establishment of new grammar schools, and ministers have been clear that that will not change."

Margaret Tulloch, from the Comprehensive Future campaign group, said grammar schools widened the gap between rich and poor.

"We want to see not grammar schools abolished, but selection abolished. We don't want the 11-plus; we don't want children facing this barrier, this test at 11, which rejects most children, especially poor children and children with special needs," she said.

"I'm very concerned about what is happening. This is the thin end of the wedge."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

From other news sites

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +16

    Comment number 495.

    Seems to me these days we try to encourage everyone to get a degree and go into management. Who's left to do the important non management jobs?

    We should allow academically minded kids to go to Grammar schools, but also encourage practical minded kids to take up vocational schooling and build a society that respects craftsmen and artisans and allows them to earn a decent wage.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 476.

    Bring back Grammars but elevate practical subjects in non grammar schools, which are of equal if not greater importance to the economy.
    Academia is not more important to the economy than practical subjects and does not deserve some snobbish elevated status.
    Equalise the two and you have a non elitist near perfect education system.

  • rate this
    -10

    Comment number 301.

    Grammar shcools themselves are not bad, it's that the system which they belonged to reeks of class prejudices. (Those at the top of the heap will not doubt disagree).

    Streaming kids at 11 is wrong. Children should never be discounted and marginalised on a single bad exam - they should be encouraged to improve after a poor performance and that requires a level playing field at every level.

  • rate this
    -24

    Comment number 243.

    My children attend the local secondary comprehensive. It is inclusive and provides excellent opportunities. Education is also about getting on with a range of people with different abilities. Any moves that promote further division in an already divisive education system should be avoided.

  • rate this
    +19

    Comment number 219.

    This is excellent news! schools that place pupils according to ability give a better education for EVERYONE, This of course means those who are less academic can have an education that allows them to reach their true potential too. My one suggestion would be to introduce perhaps an exam at 13/14 to grammar schools as (speaking from experience) some of us are late bloomers!

 

Comments 5 of 14

 

More Education & Family stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • HouseboatLife on the water

    Could a floating house be the home of the future? The BBC's Adam Shaw takes a look

Programmes

  • The Audi RS7Click Watch

    Tech news review of the week including a speed record for a self-driving car

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.