Gove denies political interference in GCSEs

 

Michael Gove: Grade boundary decisions "made by exam boards entirely free from any political pressure"

Related Stories

Education Secretary Michael Gove denied political interference in this year's GCSE results, as A*-C grades fell for the first time in the exam's history.

Mr Gove insisted exam boards made their own decisions about where to set grade boundaries, amid claims of last minute changes to English GCSE boundaries.

Head teachers are angry at a drop in the number of pupils who achieved at least a grade C in their English GCSE.

The row broke out as about 658,000 16-year-olds received their results.

Across all subjects, the proportion of GCSE entries in England, Wales and Northern Ireland awarded at least a C has fallen for the first time since the exams replaced O-levels in 1988.

This year's results, published by the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ), show 69.4% of all subject entries earned grades A*-C, compared with 69.8% last year.

Pupils receiving A* and A grades were down from 23.2% last year to 22.4%.

English results

But it was the grades awarded in English that appear to have caused the most upset, with teachers saying this summer's papers were marked too harshly.

GCSE results since 1988

Individual schools have reported unprecedented numbers of pupils failing to get a grade C or above.

In GCSE English, 63.9% of entries got at least a grade C, compared to 65.4% last summer. Some 15% were awarded an A or A*, down from 16.8% in 2011.

In English literature, 76.3% of exams were awarded A*-C, compared to 78.4% last year, and 23.2% got at least an A, against 25% in 2011.

Mr Gove told the BBC that exam boards, in conversation with England's exams regulator Ofqual, were ensuring that new style exams, sat for the first time this year, were comparable with those in previous years.

But he stressed: "The decision about where to set grade boundaries is made by exam boards.

The results in numbers

69.4% of entries earned grades A*- C
It's a drop of 0.4 percentage points on 2011

English lit A*- C grades fell significantly
2011
78.4%
2012
76.3%


So did A*- C grades in science...
2011
62.9%
2012
60.7%


Overall, girls beat boys A*- C
Girls
73.3%
Boys
65.4%


Change in take up since 2011
  • Science 36.5%
  • German 5.5%
  • Spanish 10.0%
  • French 0.5%

"If you take English, then yes the number of As and A*s has fallen but the number of Bs has increased. The number of Cs has fallen and the number of Ds has increased.

"And that is the result of the independent judgements made by exam boards entirely free from any political pressure."

He said he had not been expecting a fall in grades, adding that these new GCSEs in maths, English and ICT, had been brought in by the previous Labour government.

Autumn reforms

Mr Gove, who has spoken of a possible return to more rigorous exams based on the old O-level, said the government would bring forward proposals for the reform of GCSEs to the autumn.

"We want to change them, to improve them."

Shadow Education Secretary Stephen Twigg said it was important to understand why results had fallen.

"Is it because of pressure from Ofqual to shift grade boundaries?

"Serious concerns have been raised regarding the English GCSE in some quarters. As well as ensuring standards remain rigorous, we must ensure all pupils are treated consistently and fairly.

"Michael Gove and his education ministers must explain what has happened."

C/D borderline

Brian Lightman, general secretary of the Association of School College Leaders, said the English results must be looked into, saying it was "morally wrong to manipulate exam grades in this way".

Start Quote

I felt no pressure to do anything different to what we have always done”

End Quote Andrew Hall AQA

He said: "The big issue, schools are telling us, is at the C/D borderline in English.

"What appears to have happened is that, halfway through the year, it was decided that too many students were going to get a C grade in English and the grade boundaries of the exam were pushed up very substantially.

"Students who were working at a C level throughout the year, who were told on their assessments that they were in line for a C, have found out today that this is worth a D."

It has also emerged that the Welsh government had concerns about how some English GCSEs were being assessed.

Welsh Education Minister Mr Andrews said: "We had concerns about the methodology being used by Ofqual in relation to English Language GCSE, and my officials raised these with Ofqual two weeks ago.

"There will be further meetings with Ofqual on this in the autumn."

Grades 'comparable'

But the exams boards insisted this year's grades were comparable to any other and that examiners were "comfortable" with the grades awarded.

Mr Andrews later said he believed the exam system was being "politicised" in England - and that exam boards had been pressured to mark more harshly.

"When Michael Gove says jump, the head of (exam regulator) Ofqual says 'how high'," he said.

"We need to look at the integrity of the Welsh system and whether we can have confidence in the Welsh system if political decisions in London are going to undermine performance in Wales."

And Cllr Nickie Aiken, Westminster City Council cabinet member for children, young people and community protection said "it appears the goal posts have been moved for a particular group of children halfway through their two-year exam and study period, which is simply not fair."

AQA chief executive Andrew Hall said: "I can certainly say I felt no pressure to do anything different to what we have always done," he said.

In an attempt to address concerns of "dumbing down" and ensure results were comparable, England's exams regulator, Ofqual, told exam boards they would have to justify any results notably different to those of previous years.

This year a number of new GCSE syllabuses, including English, mathematics and ICT, are being assessed for the first time. So extra measures have been taken to ensure grades are comparable.

The system known as "comparable outcomes" - which focuses on the proportion of students achieving each grade - sparked accusations that the exam boards were being asked to fix results.

In Northern Ireland, students bucked the national trend of falling GCSE grades and instead saw a slight improvement in their results.

A* to C grades went up by a small margin to 75.6%.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 561.

    To all the people of the 'exams are obviously easier' persuasion, I openly invite you to sit any GCSE over the next 12 months and see what grade you'd get. I wonder how many would pass.
    The only true way to analyse year on year progression, is to deliver identical exams, obviously this would have to be run without the knowledge of the teaching establishments

  • rate this
    +25

    Comment number 43.

    The trouble with exams is that so much depends on technique. Exams are not easier nor are standards higher, it is exam techniques that have been improved. Students are better prepared to sit exams in a way that gets the highest mark possible. Assessing a whole years work in a couple of hours is what is really flawed.

  • rate this
    +21

    Comment number 12.

    Hurray! At last an end to the ridiculous grade inflation that has made exam results meaningless. Employers and Universities have been saying for years that standards are falling and yet more and more young people are walking away with a fist full of A grades.

  • rate this
    +12

    Comment number 11.

    Gove is right to want to reassess these exams, the sooner the better for all the children who are taking them and for employers to have trust in them.
    As a former employer i was disgusted by the poor quality of basic skills which meant providing young employees with calculators as they could not do any mental arithmetic and had no real idea of how to cope in the real world.

  • rate this
    +18

    Comment number 5.

    Back in the day (ok I'm older) - there were no targets - you might have been on track for a certain grade - but it didn't mean you would get it. Why should it be so easy. I'm one of those who believes the exams (or marking) have been getting easier - this is redressing the balance.

 

Comments 5 of 6

 

More Education & Family stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on BBC News

  • Pulling a pint in MauritiusThe beer hunter

    One man's quest to bring artisan beer to the island of Mauritius

Programmes

  • A bird of prey in a Tokyo animal cafeThe Travel Show Watch

    From cats to rabbits and birds of prey – Tokyo’s flourishing animal cafe scene

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.