NHS shift on implants

A defective silicone gel breast implant, which was removed from a patient and manufactured by French company Poly Implant Prothese PIP implants were banned in 2010 as they contain unauthorised silicone filler

Related Stories

The government position on the safety of PIP implants has not changed, but there has been a dramatic shift in the way it is dealing with this issue.

The reason is the committee advising the Health Secretary Andrew Lansley has said the anxiety women may be experiencing has to be taken into account.

The committee, led by Sir Bruce Keogh, NHS Medical Director, concluded that the worry caused to women by having untested implants in their body is itself a form of health risk.

As a result, women treated on the NHS - will be offered removal and replacement implants if women decide that's what they want after a scan and consultation with their surgeon. All those treated on the NHS will have been cancer patients undergoing reconstructive surgery.

The government expects the private clinics - who carried out 95% of the surgery - almost all for breast enlargement - to do the same.

Moral duty

But if private clinics no longer exist or refuse to help, then the NHS will remove the implants, but will not replace them.

The Health Department said private clinics had a moral and a legal duty to help its patients.

Spire Healthcare and Nuffield Health have both said they will offer free replacement implants if that's what women want.

But it's not yet clear though whether other health firms will follow suit.

The government decision places immense pressure on the private sector to provide free replacement treatment - if they fail to do so it could be a public relations disaster.

But it is worth stressing the position here is different from that in France, Germany, the Czech Republic and other countries who are recommending removal of the implants as a precaution.

Ministers here maintain there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine removal of the implants. The advice from the expert committee has now been published.


This is the key section on page nine of the review report which is leading to a change in the way the issue is being dealt with:

"Whatever the objective evidence on safety, many women with PIP implants will understandably be very worried about the possible implications for their health. In itself, this anxiety is a form of health risk and must be addressed with understanding and compassion by those responsible for their treatment......The NHS will support removal of PIP implants if, informed by an assessment of clinical need, risk and the impact of unresolved concerns, a woman with her doctor decides that it is right to do so. The NHS will replace the implants if the original operation was done by the NHS.....The group (ie the expert committee) endorses this offer. It expects providers in the private sector to take similar steps.

The Department of Health is keen to stress that if the NHS has to step in to treat private patients it will do all it can to recover the costs of surgery from the private sector.

How much all this will cost is hard know. If 40,000 women wanted their implants replaced at £5,000 a time that would come to £200 million.

The expert committee makes it clear that the issue of safety has not been settled because inadequate data has been provided. It says:

"On the currently available information, the group considers that the statistical evidence on the rate of ruptures for PIP implants compared with other implants is incomplete and this risk cannot be assessed accurately. For this reason it is unable to come to any view on comparative rupture rates."

This issue clearly has a long way to go and women treated in the NHS and private sector must now begin to consider what they want to do.

Fergus Walsh, Medical correspondent Article written by Fergus Walsh Fergus Walsh Medical correspondent

Boy has ears created from ribs localisation->translate("watch"); ?>

A nine-year-old boy who was born without ears has had a pair created from his ribs.

Watch Fergus's report

More on This Story

Related Stories


Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    Actually not ALL of the NHS implants will be for post-cancer reconstruction. A minority will have been funded under strict criteria, such as congenital absence of breast tissue or marked asymmetry of breast tissue.

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    Its right for the NHS to replace/remove these implants if they've been used as reconstructive surgery from breast cancer.Women who had them done for reasons of vanity should go back to the organisation that did the ops.The NHS should be a last resort for these, not the first.

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    Where vanity was the original motive, NHS (ie the taxpayer) should not be footing the bill. There are far more deserving uses of NHS resources- make those responsible, or their insurers stump up here.

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    my implants were done because of breast cancer on the nhs buts my daughter's were done privately because of personal reasons which has dramatically changed her life, she saved for 5 years to have it done its not her fault the private sector let her down i hope she gets a reduce price replacement

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    I have been a tax for 30 years, if i need the help of the NHS then i clearly am entitled to it, as for this is not just a vanity issue it is a health issue, lots of women have breast implants for other reasons, not just vanity.


Comments 5 of 98


This entry is now closed for comments

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on BBC News

  • bikeWheels of change

    Ten new bikes that are reinventing the humble two-wheeler for the 21st Century


  • A bird of prey in a Tokyo animal cafeThe Travel Show Watch

    From cats to rabbits and birds of prey – Tokyo’s flourishing animal cafe scene

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.