First trial results of human embryonic stem cells

 

Related Stories

After more than a decade of waiting, the first results of a trial involving human embryonic stem cells have been published in a medical journal.

The Lancet reports how two women in the USA with eye disease were injected with stem cells and both apparently showed some slight improvement in vision. The company Advanced Cell Technology (ACT) says the patients are doing well four months on from the trial.

This is a significant moment because there has been so much expectation about human embryonic stem cells - which have the potential to turn into any tissue in the body.

It has been a controversial area of research in the United States. In 2001 President Bush imposed restrictions on federal funding for embryo research on moral grounds.

These were reversed by Barrack Obama in 2009.

You can read more about this area of research and about other types of stem cells here.

Study participant Julia Hawkins has Stargardt's disease

A previous trial involving spinal patients was abandoned by the US biotech firm Geron. The company said the safety trial had gone well and it had to stop the trial because of financial problems.

But the end result was that the data never made it into a peer reviewed journal.

That means the ACT trial is now the first official human embryonic stem cell trial to have reported.

One of the patients suffers from Stargardt's disease - which leads to progressive deterioration of vision. The other has age-related macular degeneration, the main cause of blindness in the developed world.

Both patients had such poor vision they were registered blind.

They both had retinal cells, derived from human embryonic stem cells, injected into the back of the eye.

After the treatment they showed some slight improvement in vision. You can read more about the trial here.

This has prompted one extraordinary newspaper headline: Once they were blind, now they see. Patients cured by stem cell 'miracle'.

I realise there is a lot of excitement about this area of research, but I would urge caution. The authors of the Lancet paper make no special claims about the study which was designed to show whether the treatment was safe.

They say: "So far, the cells seem to have transplanted into both patients without abnormal proliferation, teratoma formation, graft rejection, or other untoward pathological reactions or safety signals."

In other words the treatment did not appear to do any harm. Of particular concern was the risk of the cells forming tumours, which did not happen. This is enough to give scientists encouragement to continue the trials.

Although the study was simply designed to show safety, the researchers could not ignore the apparent slight improvement in vision of the two women.

But the authors say: "We are uncertain at this point whether any of the visual gains we have recorded were due to the transplanted cells, the use of immunosuppressive drugs, or a placebo effect."

That is crucial and shows why further larger trials are needed. As I've reported before, the European arm of this trial is being conducted at Moorfields Hospital in London.

The first British patient - a man with Stargardt's disease - was treated last week. Again, this was a safety trial rather than an attempt to improve vision.

So there is a long way to go before there's talk of miracle treatments and curing blindness.

 
Fergus Walsh Article written by Fergus Walsh Fergus Walsh Medical correspondent

Superbugs to kill 'more than cancer' by 2050

Drug resistant infections will kill an extra 10 million people a year worldwide by 2050 unless action is taken, a study says.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 45.

    35. bigjohnthered

    "Last year, a Human Trachea made from Stem Cells was transplanted into cancer patient.
    Say no more"

    There is a bit more to be said, bigjohnthered. That transplant - & others, there have been a few - have all used ADULT stem cells. All succesful stem cell treatments to date have used ADULT stem cells.
    ESC activity has been an expensive & fruitless waste of time, money and hope.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 44.

    The current trials at ACT are unlikely to have an adverse environmetal impact, as Wolfiewoods implies. I infer from his comments that he doesn't have a young son losing his sight, as I do.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 43.

    I don’t think that treatments such as this will harm the environment in any way as it will make little difference to population size however huge numbers of people in the third world die from easily preventable illness & there is the dilemma, if we intervene we will save very many lives & just think what that will do to the environment.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 42.

    The future of this research is Induced Pluripotent Adult Stem Cells. They have the huge advantage that each patient supplies the raw material, and the resulting treatment is treated as "native" by the body, thus obviating the need for anti-rejection drugs.

    Sadly, many Scientists in the early days pinned their reputations and their grants to embryonic cells - the beta-max of stem cell research.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 41.

    @1
    Would "letting disease run its course" be environmentally friendly? Let me explain. I watched my father suffer through Parkinsons Disease for 16 years. It's incurable. It didn't kill him, such diseases rarely do. Stem cell treatment might have given him 16 years of life worth living and actually saved the environment from the chemical treatments he was on. Before posting, please engage brain!

 

Comments 5 of 45

 

Features & Analysis

BBC Future

(Thinkstock)

Why boredom is good for you

The unexpected benefit of tedium Read more...

Programmes

  • Tom BrookTalking Movies Watch

    Tom Brook looks back at some of the best movies of 2014 from around the world

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.