H5N1 bird flu research to be published in full

 
H5N1 virus Bird flu does not pass easily between humans

Related Stories

The author of controversial research on the H5N1 bird flu virus is delighted his work looks finally set to be published.

Prof Ron Fouchier, from the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam, said it was the only way to advance scientific knowledge and public health.

The US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) ruled Prof Fouchier's work, and that of Dr Yoshihiro Kawaoka of the University of Wisconsin, posed no threat to public health or national security.

It has sent its recommendation to the US government for approval.

The H5N1 virus is lethal to birds, but does not transmit easily to people.

Start Quote

There was intense concern that - in the wrong hands - the research could help create a bio-weapon. ”

End Quote

However, these papers showed how just a handful of mutations could make it infectious in aerosol form to ferrets - animals which are the best mimic for how it might affect humans.

The issue provoked huge debate among the scientific community as to whether details of the research should be kept secret or released in full only to those working in the field of virology.

Security risk

There was intense concern that - in the wrong hands - the research could help create a bio-weapon.

But following revisions of the two papers, they look set to be published in full by the journals Science and Nature.

Prof Fouchier said he had revised his paper - not to conceal any details - but to add more information.

He said: "We have made it clear that the virus is much less lethal than had initially been thought by the NSABB.

"We have also added data on how we did this work safely and explained better the benefits of the research with respect to pandemic preparation."

Much misunderstanding

Prof Fouchier said there had been a lot of misunderstanding about the mutated virus he created and admitted the initial version of his research could have been clearer.

There had been widespread media reports that the virus, in its aerosol form, killed every ferret exposed to it.

Prof Fouchier said it did not kill any of them, and was lethal only when sprayed directly into the nose of the animals.

The NSABB said it strongly supports the "unrestricted communication of research unless that information could be directly misused to pose a significant and immediate risk to public health and safety."

Prof Paul Kein, chair of the NSABB praised the researchers involved: "What you've seen is incredibly responsible behaviour by entire scientific community."

The decision of the US panel will be broadly welcomed by leading science bodies, but the issue raises important questions as to when it may be right to censor science which has the potential both to help and harm mankind.

 
Fergus Walsh, Medical correspondent Article written by Fergus Walsh Fergus Walsh Medical correspondent

Analysis: Assisted dying debate

Reflections on one of the most significant issues facing society

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    FDA Approves First U.S. Vaccine for Humans Against the Avian Influenza Virus H5N1 …
    http://phc.amedd.army.mil/topics/discond/inf/Pages/AvianFlu.aspx - 68KB - 11/1/2011
    Based on these results Individuals with B19 IgG antibodies are only considered immune to recurrent infection via Inhalation of airborne conidia. Mink enteritis virus (MEV) is a species of B19 parvovirus & Mink includes ferrets...

  • rate this
    -7

    Comment number 2.

    So this entire thing wasn't so they could have high level meetings to discuss how to put a lid back on the research showing mouse retroviruses, that are highly related to lab viruses found in mice, as implicated in multiple cancers and neuro immune diseases like ME and autism?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 3.

    So the United States now rules the world ? If this man is from Rotterdam then it's no business of the US to decide if he can publish his research or not !
    It's time for the far reaching American government to be reminded that they don't own the world !

  • rate this
    -9

    Comment number 4.

    @Icebloo. Yep. And could it be that it suits many countries to hand their medical problems to the US Government scientists to shut down.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 5.

    Fergus, you wrote: "Prof Fouchier said it did not kill any of them, and was lethal only when sprayed directly into the nose of the animals."

    No -- he did not say that; you asked him about that. He has said in several recent public fora that his mutated H5N1 was only lethal in ferrets when infected, in large doses, directly into their trachea.

    This is not the same as a spray into their noses.

 

Comments 5 of 17

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Features & Analysis

  • Man holding lipWitch hunt

    The country where a blasphemy charge is a death sentence


  • Espresso cupNews quiz

    Which city serves the strongest cup of coffee?


  • Irvine WelshDeaf ears

    Five famous Scots who can't vote in the Scottish referendum


  • Electric chairReturn of 'the chair'

    Five people talk about their roles in Tennessee's execution debate


BBC Future

(SPL)

How to learn while you sleep

Enhance memory with your eyes shut Read more...

Programmes

  • Leader of Hamas Khaled MeshaalHARDtalk Watch

    BBC exclusive: Hamas leader on the eagerness to end bloodshed in Gaza

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.