Home births more 'cost effective', says Oxford study

 
Mother and baby Hospital births can be more costly and involve more interventions than home births, the study says

Related Stories

Planned births at home and in midwifery units are more cost-effective than giving birth in hospital, particularly for women who have given birth before, University of Oxford research suggests.

The research, in the British Medical Journal, compared the costs of giving birth in different places and the health outcomes for mother and baby.

More than 60,000 low-risk women in England were studied over two years.

The Royal College of Midwives says all women should receive one-to-one care.

For women having their first baby, however, planned home birth was more risky for the baby but still the most cost-effective option.

The study used data from the Birthplace in England national study to calculate the cost, and health effects, of women at low-risk of complications giving birth.

Birth costs

It looked at planned births in obstetric units, midwifery units located in the same hospital as an obstetric unit, free-standing midwifery units not in a hospital and at home.

Start Quote

The potential for cost savings could make offering women more choice an attractive option for the NHS”

End Quote Liz Schroeder University of Oxford

The study takes into account all NHS costs associated with the birth itself - such as midwifery care during labour and immediately after the birth, the cost of pain relief in hospital, and the cost of any stay in hospital or neonatal unit immediately after the birth, either by the mother or the baby.

The costs for planned home and midwifery unit births take account of any hospital care a woman may receive if she is transferred into hospital during labour or after the birth.

But the costs do not include any longer term costs, for example the life-long cost of caring for babies who suffer serious birth injuries.

The study found that the average cost per low-risk woman planning birth at the start of labour was £1,631 for an obstetric unit, compared with £1,067 at home.

When the researchers analysed women who had already given birth or who had no complicating conditions, the cost differences between planned places of birth narrowed.

The authors of the study conclude that giving women the opportunity to give birth at home or in a midwifery unit saves the NHS money and is safe for baby and mother, resulting in fewer expensive interventions.

AVERAGE COST OF BIRTH

  • £1,066 - births planned at home
  • £1,435 - births in freestanding midwifery units
  • £1,461 - births in midwifery units alongside hospitals
  • £1,631 - births in hospital obstetric units

Source: BMJ study

Liz Schroeder, health economist and co-author of the study from the University of Oxford, said that not all women had a choice of where to have their baby.

"At the time of the study, only half of the NHS Trusts in England provided women with access to a midwifery unit, and occupancy levels were often low.

"The findings of the Birthplace study may encourage women - particularly women having a second or subsequent baby - to request an 'out of hospital' birth. And the potential for cost savings could make offering women more choice an attractive option for the NHS."

Home comforts

The study found that individual care at home is cheaper than a planned hospital birth because hospital overheads tend to be higher and women who plan birth in an obstetric unit tend to have more interventions, such as caesarean section, which are expensive.

Recent research into the safety of home birth, using the same group of women as in this study, found that it carries a slightly higher risk for the babies of first-time mothers, but no increased risk for babies of mothers who have already given birth.

Start Quote

For low-risk mothers expecting their second or third baby, home birth is a safe option.”

End Quote Dr Tony Falconer Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists

Mervi Jokinen, professional adviser to the Royal College of Midwives, said: "Well-organised home births are perfectly viable for low-risk women, and we know there are other benefits too, like less stress and more comfort.

"But women should be able to receive one-to-one care, whether at home or in hospital."

'Complications'

Dr Tony Falconer, president of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said the study results support the development of midwifery units within hospitals.

"This paper shows that the costs between freestanding and 'alongside' midwifery units are very similar. The close proximity of alongside units provides easier transfer, should complications arise during the labour, thereby reducing stress and anxiety a woman may face."

Dr Falconer added that "for low-risk mothers expecting their second or third baby, home birth is a safe option".

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 169.

    I recently gave birth in hospital and was treated badly i had a wonderful midwife on arival but as her shift ended i had a new midwife who was rude i was made to feel like a inconvience. During the pushing stage i was left alone with noone but my partner for up to 40 mins at a time. Next time i would go for a home birth as it would be much less stessful and personal.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 142.

    Speaking from experience, had first baby in hospital and second baby was a planned home birth.Home birth was wonderful I could get on with things around the house and even took my son to school while in labour.The distraction of being able to move around and do as I pleased acted as pain relief and my husband did not have to hang around like a spare part. I do it again thumbs up for home births.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 140.

    My beautiful wife recently delivered our lovely son ( first born ) at home in a birthpool. She didn't want to go to hospital to deliver because of the lack of homely comforts, scare stories and the impersonal treatment she may receive.
    Our midwife was ecstatic when we told her we wanted a home birth. Although things didn't go perfectly for our son, my wife would still not 'go in' to give birth

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 124.

    My son was born in a Midwifery Led unit in Melton Mowbray and the care was fantastic, more personal and intimate then we would have got in a large hospital. People saying the only place to give birth is in a hospital is just sheer ignorance, some need to be in hospital others do not, those that do not then you have choice at home or in a unit. Most midwives are worth a lot more than they get paid

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 120.

    I had my son in hospital and it was a nightmare. I nearly gave birth on my own!
    I had my daughter at home in 2000 and it was truly wonderful. the best experience of my life.
    It still hurt though. Ouch!

 

Comments 5 of 12

 

Features & Analysis

BBC Future

(Thinkstock)

Why are most of us right-handed?

A vexing mystery of the human body Read more...

Programmes

  • An ECG (electrocardiogram)Click Watch

    The wearable technology which could allow you to pay for goods with your heartbeat

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.