PIP breast implants: 'serious lessons must be learned'

Breast implant The implants were manufactured by the French company Poly Implant Prothese (PIP)

Related Stories

A government review into the PIP breast implant scandal has found that serious lessons must be learned.

The review was led by Health Minister Lord Howe and examined the role of the Department of Health and the UK regulator the MHRA.

It questions how well women with these implants were informed about the risks.

It says that although the MHRA followed scientific and clinical advice, it should "review and further develop its communications capability."

And it must "obtain evidence from a wider and more detailed set of sources..."

The issue is with safety of silicone breast implants made by the French company Poly Implant Prothese (PIP).

The firm's products were banned in 2010 when it emerged that industrial grade silicone was being used. Implants should be made from medical grade material, which has passed safety tests for use in a human body.

PIP timeline

  • December 2002 Surgeon writes to MHRA about patient whose PIP implants have both ruptured within two years
  • 2003-2010 Over 20 letters from MHRA to PIP about adverse incidents
  • March 2010 PIP implants are banned due to concerns over unapproved filler
  • July 2010 Test results reveal no evidence that filler is harmful
  • 23 Dec 2011 French government recommends all women with PIP implants have them removed as a precaution
  • 23 Dec 2011 MHRA says no need for routine removal
  • 6 Jan 2012 Expert committee says NHS will remove and replace PIP implants if women want and private firms should do same

The report says this was a case of deliberate fraud by the PIP manufacturer and regulation alone cannot prevent that.

But it says a "higher level of proactive public communication could have been helpful", especially while awaiting toxicology test results. It suggests a more creative interaction with affected women, perhaps through use of social networking (like Facebook) could have been useful.

In March the Commons Health Committee criticised the government and health regulator for failing to adopt a high profile sooner.

'Serious lessons'

Lord Howe says there is no evidence that the MHRA or the Department of Health significantly failed to do their job.

"But serious lessons must be learned from this scandal. The MHRA needs to look at how it gathers evidence so it is able to identify problems early. It needs to better analyse reports about higher risk medical devices. And it needs to improve the way it communicates with the public."

You can hear my interview with Lord Howe here:

Lord Howe: "In the private clinics... many of the women were left completely in the dark"

Between 2003 and 2010 more than 20 letters were sent from the MHRA to PIP raising concerns about the implants. In hindsight, "this body of evidence could be seen as suggestive of a problematic manufacturer."

The review concludes that regulators in all EU countries need to work better together to support early detection of problems, share the information they gather and take appropriate action to protect patients.

Commenting, the President of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, Fazel Fatah, said: "Poor post-marketing surveillance of medical devices lies at the root of the PIP crisis. At the BAAPS we feel there needs to be significantly more stringent monitoring of all medical devices including breast implants and all cosmetic injectables, via compulsory, regular reporting of adverse effects and mystery shopping which are all part of our regulation proposals."

cosmetic surgery

Around 47,000 women in the UK have PIP breast implants. Around 95% were fitted privately. A minority of operations were carried out on the NHS, mostly for breast reconstruction following cancer.

Lord Howe's review into PIP implants is one of two set up by the Department of Health in January.

The second review, led by Professor Sir Bruce Keogh, the NHS Medical Director, will look at whether the cosmetic surgery industry needs to be more effectively regulated.

In January Prof Keogh's team concluded there was insufficient evidence to recommend the routine removal of PIP implants. But it recognised the concern that the issue was causing.

It found there was no link between PIP implants and cancer, and the evidence on increased rupture rates was inconclusive.

Throughout the UK any women who had PIP implants fitted on the NHS can get them removed and replaced free of charge.

In Wales the NHS will also replace those of private patients. In England and Scotland the NHS will remove implants of private patients but not replace them.

Latest figures from the Department of Health in England show that 6,632 women with private PIP implants have been referred for hospital checks; 3,865 scans have been completed.

433 women have decided to have the implants removed and 185 have had the surgery.

836 NHS patients with PIP implants have been contacted, 82 scans completed. 214 decisions have been made to remove the implants and 66 women have had this surgery.

Fergus Walsh Article written by Fergus Walsh Fergus Walsh Medical correspondent

Defeating cancer, the 'evil genius'

Can we win the war against cancer? Over the past 18 months, Panorama has followed a group of patients on drug trials. Some who'd been given months to live, are keeping cancer at bay for years.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 378.

    Sounds like the UK Government as ever -

    Private company makes a mess, director/owners make massive profit, Government pick up tab? Are we sure these clinics are aren't owned by the banks?

  • rate this

    Comment number 377.

    "You own the most amazing machine you will ever own, it doesn't need 'improvements'."

    Great to see another Saab fan on HYS.

  • rate this

    Comment number 376.

    The biggest lesson here is for all that we need to be SO careful what we put in our bodies.There are an array of reasons why women choose to have implants and many are NOT down to pure vanity.The medical community DO need to take responsibility if have mistakenly approved something as safe.If private companies cant afford to correct all 100% free...they at least need to offer nearly free.

  • rate this

    Comment number 375.

    For the record, women with pip implants do NOT want you to pay! They want the company who put them in to just answer the phone and deal with it. There is a lot I could say but truly the idea that this is just about vanity is grossly out of sync with the reality of how crippling body confide issues can be. Maybe if anyone had actually listened to why women do this you might learn something!

  • rate this

    Comment number 374.

    If they had chosen saline filling, the worse that could have happened would have been deflation.


Comments 5 of 378


Features & Analysis

BBC Future

(Getty Images)

What it’s really like to die

The seven experiences you face at the end


  • Former al-Qaeda double agent Aimen DeanHARDtalk Watch

    Islamic State is about revenge says former al-Qaeda member turned spy Aimen Dean

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.