'Three people, one baby' public consultation begins


Related Stories

A public consultation has been launched to discuss the ethics of using three people to create one baby.

The technique could be used to prevent debilitating and fatal "mitochondrial" diseases, which are passed down only from mother to child.

However, the resulting baby would contain genetic information from three people - two parents and a donor woman.

Ministers could change the law to make the technique legal after the results of the consultation are known.

About one in 200 children are born with faulty mitochondria - the tiny power stations which provide energy to every cell in the body.

Most show little or no symptoms, but in the severest cases the cells of the body are starved of energy. It can lead to muscle weakness, blindness, heart failure and in some cases can be fatal.

Mitochondria are passed on from the mother's egg to the child - the father does not pass on mitochondria through his sperm. The idea to prevent this is to add a healthy woman's mitochondria into the mix.

Two main techniques have been shown to work in the laboratory, by using a donor embryo or a donor egg.

How do you make a baby from three people?
Method one: Embryo repair 1) Two embryos are fertilised with sperm creating an embryo from the intended parents and another from the donors. 2) The pronuclei, which contain genetic information, are removed from both embryos but only the parents' is kept 3) A healthy embryo is created by adding the parents' pronuclei to the donor embryo, which is finally implanted into the womb
Method two: Egg repair Step 1. Eggs from a mother with damaged mitochondria and a donor with healthy mitochondria are collected. Step 2. The majority of the genetic material is removed from both eggs. Step 3. The mother's genetic material is inserted into the donor egg, which can be fertilised by sperm.

However, mitochondria contain their own genes in their own set of DNA. It means any babies produced would contain genetic material from three people. The vast majority would come from the mother and father, but also mitochondrial DNA from the donor woman.

This would be a permanent form of genetic modification, which would be passed down through the generations.

Start Quote

It has huge potential significance for society because for the first time children would be born with DNA from three people - what has frequently been dubbed 'three parent IVF'. Crucially that genetic alteration to what's known as the germ line would be permanent, handed down from generation to generation”

End Quote

It is one of the ethical considerations which will be discussed as part of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's consultation.

The chair of the organisation, Prof Lisa Jardine, said: "It is genetic modification of the egg - that is uncharted territory. Once we have genetic modification we have to be sure we are damn happy."

She said it was a question of "balancing the desire to help families have healthy children with the possible impact on the children themselves and wider society".

Other ethical issues will also be considered, such as how children born through these techniques feel, when they should be told, the effect on the parents and the status of the donor woman - should she be considered in the same way as an egg donor in IVF?

Mitochondrion Hundreds of mitochondria in every cell provide energy

It is not the first time these issues have been discussed. A report by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics said the treatment was ethically OK, but the group Human Genetics Alert said the procedure was unnecessary, dangerous and set a precedent for genetically modified designer babies.

The consultation will run until 7 December and the conclusions will be presented to ministers next spring.

Research into the area is legal in the UK, but it cannot be used in patients.

However, treatments in IVF clinics will be years away even if the public and ministers decide the techniques should go ahead. There are still questions around safety which need to be addressed.

One of the pioneers of the methods, Prof Mary Herbert from Newcastle University, said: "We are now undertaking experiments to test the safety and efficacy of the new techniques.

"This work may take three to five years to complete."


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 380.

    Babies born with this condition often suffer hugely and have shortened lives.
    Nature has created this problem, and it's a step forward to be able to help some parents in a meaningful way. If the gene is "bred" out of the line, then the savings in stress, emotion, worry, and ultimately financial savings will surely make it worth it.

    No-one should see their child die for want of a bit of science.

  • rate this

    Comment number 337.

    We lost our son to a mitochondrial disorder at 4 and half months old - he would have been 6 years old this Friday. We had to go for egg donation privately as there was a 13 YEAR waiting list on the NHS!! We had never heard of mitochondrial disorders - this treatment should be offered free to couples like us that have no other options. Too late for me though...

  • rate this

    Comment number 323.

    As a paediatrician, we see families affected by these devastating conditions.
    To people who don't agree with this technology: if your child had a severe disease leading to pain, disability and death before the age of 5, and you had the opportunity to prevent this for your next child, would you take it?
    The child's personality and physical characteristics wouldn't be affected, but they'd be healthy

  • rate this

    Comment number 314.

    In nature evolutionary boundaries are surpassed by abnormalities within a species. I can't help but feel uneasy about our attempts to eradicate death and disease by creating "normal" human beings. By "normalising", we reduce our ability to naturally adapt and could be forced to create such abnormalities to cope in future. I just hope we are not the creators of our own destruction.

  • rate this

    Comment number 310.

    I don't believe that there is a right to have a child, however, I do believe that there is a right to have a healthy child. Anything we can do to rectify or remedy genetic defects should be permitted.


Comments 5 of 18


More Health stories


Features & Analysis

BBC Future

(Getty Images)

The man who studies evil

He spots the ‘everyday sadists’ among us


  • Temperature remoteThe Travel Show Watch

    The remote to control the temperature of your shoes plus other travel gadgets reviewed

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.