Pregnancy advice 'scaremongering'

 
Pregnant woman

Pregnancy is a huge, life-changing period in a woman's life and there is no shortage of advice about what is best for your unborn child. But in this week's Scrubbing Up, Linda Geddes, the author of Bumpology, argues this can sometimes be misleading and scaremongering.

Expectant parents are bombarded with advice about what they should and shouldn't be doing.

Pregnant women mustn't eat too much as it may raise the baby's risk of obesity or diabetes, but they mustn't diet as that could have a similar effect.

Neither should they exercise for fear of triggering a miscarriage, or get too stressed out because that's bad for the baby too. And if they do get stressed, they can't drink alcohol or go for a spa treatment to relax.

You might start to think that staying at home would be the sensible thing to do, only this too is ridden with potential dangers for your unborn child: from ice-cream, to pet shampoo, to hair dye. Even lying down or your back can allegedly cut off your baby's blood supply.

When I fell pregnant three years ago, I felt paralysed and somewhat patronised by all the conflicting advice out there.

I was also obsessed with the little life that was growing inside me, and desperate for more information about what it was doing in there.

Could it taste the curry I was eating; hear the songs I was singing; or sense when I took a swim in the freezing outdoor swimming pool near my home?

So I began a quest to investigate the truth behind the old wives' tales, alarming newspaper headlines and government guidelines, and to probe deeper into the inner world of the developing child. So Bumpology was born.

Booze and breastfeeding

Some of what I discovered while researching the book amused and amazed me: I learned that parents who already have a couple of boys are statistically more likely to go on having boys, though no-one really understands why; that the shape of a woman's bump provides no clues as to the gender of the baby within, but that women with severe morning sickness are slightly more likely to be carrying a girl; and that contrary to the received wisdom, babies actually can focus on objects further than 30cm away (even if they often under- or overshoot).

I also learned that much of the research underpinning medical advice on things like alcohol consumption - and even the health benefits of breastfeeding - is far from clear-cut and often aimed at the general population, rather than taking the individual into consideration.

In the case of alcohol, there's clear evidence that heavy drinking is harmful -- and even a daily glass of wine may increase the odds of a baby being born underweight, which carries additional risks to its health.

However, below this level, there is a massive grey zone where scientists simply don't yet have an answer to whether or not alcohol causes harm.

When it comes to breastfeeding, it's quite true that breast milk is best for babies, or at least better than formula milk in terms of protecting them against infections in the short term.

But when it comes to the much-touted long-term benefits of breastfeeding, such as protection against obesity, diabetes or allergy, the research is less convincing.

Certainly women who can't breastfeed for whatever reason, and who live in countries with a decent standard of health care, shouldn't waste too much time worrying that they are causing long-term damage to their baby's health.

'Overblown'

However, what alarmed me the most was the realisation that much of what women are told about the risks of medical interventions during labour - things like induction, epidural anaesthesia and undergoing a c-section - are overblown.

At the same time, statistics about the odds of needing medical assistance or on complications like tearing during a vaginal birth are frequently not talked about.

I believe that access to this kind of information could have a big influence on women's expectations of labour and on some of the decisions they make when planning for the birth of their child.

I also think it could help women to come to terms with things if labour doesn't go according to plan and they need additional help getting their baby out.

Having a baby can be one of the greatest joys that life bestows. However, it is also hard work and new parents can do without the unnecessary guilt, anxiety and doubt that misleading pregnancy advice brings.

It is also a time of great wonder and through my research I have learned things about my own children that will never cease to amaze me. I believe it's time to push aside the scaremongering and allow parents the freedom to enjoy this precious period of their lives.

 

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 65.

    #63, no, that isn't a fact. It's an unsupported leap from an anecdote.
    The author of this article clearly states that heavy drinking can damage the fetus. But she also states (and can provide references, if you buy her book), that it is unclear whether drinking small amounts carries an increased risk.
    In any case, attempting to extrapolate risk from a single case is statistically invalid.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 64.

    There is a lot of scare-mongering out there and a lot of people do make pregnant women and new mothers feel guilty about something. For me the breastfeeding one is key. I'm in my 2nd trimester and already people are saying I shouldn't have bought bottles etc because I should be breastfeeding when we KNOW that I won't be because medication I need to take is transferred through breast milk.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 63.

    Hi I'm a Grandmother to a 3 year old boy which I've had from birth. His biological mother binge drank every month. When my grandson was 3 months old I started noticing things were not right he never babbled slept 4 hours a night and never cried for a feed. over the months his behaviour was far from normal and at 18 months he was diagnosed with FASD all because of Alcohol. one sip is too much FACT

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 62.

    Dont know about this bit:
    "But when it comes to the much-touted long-term benefits of breastfeeding, such as protection against obesity, diabetes or allergy, the research is less convincing. "
    I've looked up what she has previously said about this in New Scientist (where bumpology started), but I've drawn a blank.. Does anybody know what evidence she brings to this?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 61.

    "Linda Geddes, the author of Bumpology" or "Linda Geddes, some woman".

    Which is more useful to you when judging the value of the article? Is it unfair politcal promotion to refer to a person by the office they hold, is it unfair to tell you what company someone works for in a bussness article? No its context.

 

Comments 5 of 65

 

More Health stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

BBC Future

(Getty Images)

The secrets of fake flavours

And the curious myth of artificial banana Read more...

Programmes

  • ShanghaiThe Travel Show Watch

    From its high-speed trains trains to its luminescent skyscrapers - take a minute to discover Shanghai

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.