Child benefit cuts lead thousands of parents to 'opt out'

Mother and pram Many thousands of people have received letters explaining that benefit entitlement will change

Some 200,000 people - of 1.2 million - have opted out of receiving child benefit, ahead of changes on Monday.

Treasury Minister David Gauke said that was "slightly above" what was expected.

Families with one parent earning more than £50,000 will lose part of the benefit. It will be fully withdrawn where one parent earns above £60,000.

But unless parents opt out of receiving it by the end of Sunday, higher earners will still get the benefit and will have to pay it back later.

Those parents opting out will no longer receive child benefit - which is tax-free - but will also not be liable for any extra tax.

But for those families who continue receiving the benefit, the higher earner who earns above £50,000 will have to fill in self-assessment forms and pay a new tax. This will not necessarily be the parent receiving child benefit.

The level of tax paid will increase progressively based on how much more than £50,000 that parent earns. It will not be higher than the amount they or their partner would have received in child benefit.

Critics say the change will mean many thousands more people will end up having to fill in self-assessment tax returns, while a children's charity said the move would come as a "damaging blow" to some families.

In total, fewer than a fifth of parents who are to lose some or all of their child benefit have opted out of receiving the payment.

Labour shadow treasury minister Chris Leslie said this was just a "small fraction" of those affected.

"It could be a very nasty surprise for those families if they perhaps next year discover that they should have opted out by tomorrow night," he told the BBC News Channel.

He said it was "possibly one of the greatest administrative shambles" the coalition government would preside over during its term in office.

'Lot of awareness'


If you or your partner get child benefit and either of you has an income of above £50,000 a year you may have to pay more tax from Monday.

The income that counts is confusingly called 'net-adjusted income'. In fact, it is your gross income before tax from all sources but minus pension contributions, child care vouchers, and gift aid donations.

If you live as a couple it is the higher income that is counted not your joint income.

If that income is more than £50,000, the person who earns it will have to pay a new tax called 'high income child benefit charge'. It will be collected through self-assessment and you must register with HMRC by 7 October.

If that income is £50,000 to £60,000, the charge will be less than the child benefit received on a sliding scale - at £55,000 it will be 50% of the child benefit received.

If that income is £60,000 or more, the charge will equal the child benefit received. In other words, one partner will get the child benefit but the higher earning partner will pay it all back in the new tax.

Q&A: Child benefit changes

On Friday, leading think tank, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), warned the policy created "administrative complexities" and could cause "incoherence in the welfare system".

Speaking on BBC Radio 5 live, Mr Gauke defended the changes, insisting the part of the HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) website which explains the changes had had around 1.2 million visitors.

He said: "Something like 200,000 people have opted out, which is slightly above what we'd expected at this stage so there does seem to be quite a lot of awareness about it."

HMRC chief executive Lin Homer agreed the transition was going "smoothly" and officials had written to some 800,000 of the estimated 1.2 million people who will be affected by the changes.

She told BBC Radio 4's Today programme HMRC had been "proactive" and was already "well ahead of where we expected to be at this point".

"Because it has worked better than expected, the administration charge of implementing this change we think is only going to be 50% of what we expected," she added.

However, some families say "opting out" of child benefit is not an option.

'Penalised by changes'

Anne Longfield, chief executive of 4Children, which runs Sure Start children's centres, said it undermined the government's commitment to children and families.

"Hard working families are already worried about how they will accommodate the rising cost of many day to day necessities such as childcare, rail fares and food. Removing their child benefit will be a damaging blow for families already feeling stretched to the limit," she said.

"Government has difficult decisions to make but families with children should not be on the frontline of cuts once again."

Nina Ketel, a mother from Cheshire, told BBC News: "I earn only £6,000 a year, but my husband earns just over £50,000 - so we are being penalised by these changes.

"I work part time for the local council so I can fit in child care around my job - I can't increase my hours.

"We can't afford to opt out so we will have to fill in the self assessment tax form."

Tax expert Heather Self said filling in tax returns can often be complex.

"I think people are concerned, not so much about whether this is fair or not, but the way the government's chosen to do it is almost the most complicated route they could have chosen," she said.

Child benefit is currently paid at the rate of £20.30 a week for the first child, and then £13.40 a week for each child after that.

It lasts until each child reaches 16, or 18 if they are still in full-time education, and in some cases until they are 20.

Because child benefit is tax-free, it has been suggested that the change for those losing all child benefit is the equivalent of a £4,000 salary cut for families with three children.

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

More UK Politics stories


Politics Live

    07:21: Tidal lagoons

    Ed Davey, the energy secretary, has been speaking to the BBC about plans to generate electricity from the world's first series of tidal lagoons in the UK. The lagoons will capture incoming and outgoing tides behind giant sea walls, and use the weight of the water to power turbines. A £1bn Swansea scheme, said to be able to produce energy for 155,000 homes, is already in the planning system. Mr Davey told BBC News: "I can't make a decision on this yet because discussions are ongoing. But I'm very excited by the prospect of tidal power. We have got some of the biggest tidal ranges in the world and it would be really useful if we could harness some of that clean energy."

    07:19: Banking tax explainer
    The city

    Here's a bit more on the Liberal Democrat plan to tax banks to pay off more of the deficit and how it would work. Corporation Tax is applied on a company's annual profits and is set to fall 1% to a rate of 20% from next month. But the Lib Dems say they wish to impose an additional corporation tax rate of 8% on banks only from April 2016. The party says this measure would raise £1bn a year and would go towards closing the structural budget deficit of £30bn. It said because failings in the banking system had caused the financial crisis, it was fair that banks helped repair the economy. Banks already pay a bank levy which has yielded £8bn over the past four years. The Conservatives may resist the proposals though. They've said they would cut the deficit solely by reducing spending. Labour says it would tax bank bonuses and re-impose the 50p top rate of income tax.

    07:14: 'Drop migration target'
    Ken Clarke

    Elsewhere this morning, Ken Clarke has said David Cameron's net migration target should be dropped. Mr Clarke, a former home secretary, said it would be impossible to reach without "severely" damaging the UK economy. He told the Times: "I am afraid that the net migration target has proved to be a mistake. It has been defended to me as almost returning to the figures to those when I was home secretary. This is true, but we weren't in a globalised economy then to the extent we are now. We will have to drop the target. It would not be possible to achieve it without damaging our economy quite severely."

    07:11: 'Beauty contest of ideas' Ross Hawkins Political correspondent, BBC News

    Despite us thinking we're a nation of homeowners, the proportion of people who actually own their own home, and live in it, has been falling in England for more than 10 years now as house prices have rocketed up. Labour have actually outbid the Conservatives by far on the number of homes they say that they would build - they are promising 200,000 homes a year by the end of the next Parliament and they say they have a plan to do it. You won't hear anyone today say the housing market is just fine, there isn't a problem here. You'll see a beauty contest of ideas, if you like, to sort it out." More on the housing announcement.: "

    @campbellclaret Alastair Campbell, former Labour spin doctor

    tweets: Hope he never gets chance but would be interesting to see if @David_Cameron meets his 200k housing pledge as quickly as NHS waiting pledge

    06:52: Defence spending
    Raymond Odierno

    Over the weekend, former defence secretary Liam Fox warned of a potential Tory rebellion if defence spending targets are not met. And now the head of the US Army - Chief of Staff General Raymond Odierno - has said he is "very concerned" about the impact of cuts in Britain. He said the falling proportion of the UK's national wealth being spent on the military could mean British troops end up operating within US ranks, rather than divisions working alongside each other. More here.

    06:46: Newspaper review
    Metro and Telegraph fronts

    Just sitting down for your first coffee of the day? Here's our overnight newspaper review, featuring today's announcement on homes from the Conservatives and a warning on UK defending spending.

    @rosschawkins Ross Hawkins, BBC political correspondent

    tweets: Housing on @BBCBreakfast - part of the reason you can't afford a home: building not yet back at pre crash levels

    Graph from Twitter
    06:28: Bank tax
    Danny Alexander

    The Liberal Democrats have announced plans to tax Britain's banks with an additional £1bn levy. Danny Alexander, the coalition's chief secretary to the Treasury, wants to effectively strip banks of the benefit of recent corporation tax cuts. The money, the Lib Dems say, would be used to pay off the deficit. More here.

    06:25: Housing pledge
    Generic homes

    Later, David Cameron will promise to make 200,000 homes available to first-time buyers in England by 2020 if the Conservatives win the election. Plans for 100,000 cut-price homes for people under 40 have already been announced by the coalition. Labour has pledged to build 200,000 new homes by 2020, while the Lib Dems have set out plans to build 300,000. More here.

    06:20: Good morning

    Hello and welcome to a fresh Monday's political coverage. Nick Eardley and Victoria King will bring you all the action, reaction and analysis in text and you'll be able to watch and listen to all the main BBC political programmes, from Today and Breakfast through to Newsnight and Today in Parliament. Don't forget you can get in touch by emailing or via social media @bbcpolitics. Here's how Sunday unfolded.



  • A very clever little girlBrain gain

    Why are people getting better at intelligence tests?

  • BeefaloBeefalo hunt

    The hybrid animal causing havoc in the Grand Canyon

  • A British Rail signBringing back BR

    Would it be realistic to renationalise the railways?

  • Banksy image of girl letting go of heart-shaped balloonFrom the heart

    Fergal Keane on the relationship between love and politics

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • KnucklesGood or bad?

    For many it can be very satisfying to 'crack' the bones in your hand, but is it bad for you?


  • BatteriesClick Watch

    More power to your phone - the lithium-ion batteries that could last twice as long

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.