Childhood asthma 'admissions down' after smoking ban

 
Cigarettes Smoking restrictions came into force in 2007

Related Stories

There was a sharp fall in the number of children admitted to hospital with severe asthma after smoke-free legislation was introduced in England, say researchers.

A study showed a 12% drop in the first year after the law to stop smoking in enclosed public places came into force.

The authors say there is growing evidence that many people are opting for smoke-free homes as well.

Asthma UK says the findings are "encouraging".

Researchers at Imperial College in London looked at NHS figures going back to April 2002.

Presenting their findings in the journal Pediatrics, they said the number of children admitted to hospital with severe asthma attacks was rising by more than 2% a year before the restrictions were introduced in July 2007.

Taking that into account, they calculated the fall in admissions in the next 12 months was 12%, and a further 3% in each of the following two years. They say over the three-year period, this was equivalent of about 6,800 admissions.

The fall was seen among boys and girls of all ages, across wealthy and deprived neighbourhoods, in cities and in rural areas.

'Unexpected' benefit

Prior to the smoke-free law much of the debate on the legislation centred on protection of bar workers from passive smoke.

At the time many critics said smokers would respond by lighting up more at home - harming the health of their families. But the authors of this study say there is growing evidence that more people are insisting on smoke-free homes.

The lead researcher, Prof Christopher Millett, said the legislation has prompted unexpected, but very welcome, changes in behaviour.

"We increasingly think it's because people are adopting smoke-free homes when these smoke-free laws are introduced and this is because they see the benefits of smoke-free laws in public places such as restaurants and they increasingly want to adopt them in their home.

"This benefits children because they're less likely to be exposed to second hand smoke."

These findings reinforce evidence on the impact of smoke-free legislation from studies in North America and Scotland, which also showed a fall in hospital admissions for children with severe asthma attacks. The law in England has also resulted in fewer admissions for heart attack.

'Particularly encouraging'

Emily Humphreys from the health charity, Asthma UK, welcomed the findings: "This is something we campaigned for, so it is particularly encouraging that there has been a fall in children's hospital admissions for asthma since its introduction.

"We have long known that smoking and second hand smoke are harmful - they not only trigger asthma attacks which put children in hospital but can even cause them to develop the condition."

She said the need now was to do more to prevent children and young people from taking up smoking, and she repeated the charity's call for the introduction of plain packaging for tobacco.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 570.

    Those of you who are asking why Asthma rates have increased since the 1970's when parents smoking around children was common? Simple. Asthma was regularly misdiagnosed until quite recently (as happened to me for 30 years). Believe me, second hand smoke and Asthma are a terrible mix.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 520.

    I'm a non-smoker who grew up with a father who smoked heavily until he quit when I was about 8 or 9. He never smoked in the house.

    I was one of those who totally welcomed the public smoking ban, but have to agree with the majority of smokers in this forum in questioning just what this is supposed to have done to combat child asthma when the areas it affects have little to do with children...

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 436.

    A reduction in the number of child asthma attacks is good news, whatever the reason.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 401.

    Seems odd, years ago many more people used to smoke yet there was far less asthma.

    I certianly agree that passive smoke is dangerous and I wouldnt want my kids anywhere near it however id guess the drop in asthma is more likely attributed to cleaner cars etc

  • rate this
    +40

    Comment number 97.

    I'm an ex smoker but I don't see how a ban that mainly affected places (pubs, workplaces etc) where children don't spend a lot of time should have such a positive impact on children's health. Also, having lived in London, I suspect that traffic pollution causes more asthma than smoking ever could.

 

Comments 5 of 13

 

More Health stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

  • Cerro RicoSatanic mines

    Devil worship in the tunnels of the man-eating mountain


  • Nefertiti MenoeWar of words

    The woman who sparked a row over 'speaking white'


  • Oil pumpPump change

    What would ending the US oil export ban do to petrol prices?


  • Brazilian Scene, Ceara, in 1893Sir Snapshot

    19th Century Brazil seen through the eyes of an Englishman


BBC Future

(Getty Images)

Should horn honkers be punished?

How tech could make driving more peaceful Read more...

Programmes

  • European Union's anti-terrorism chief Gilles de KerchoveHARDtalk Watch

    Anti-terrorism chief Gilles de Kerchove on the threat from returning Islamic State fighters

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.