NHS controversy: A sign of things to come?

 
Hospital ward Lewisham is not the only A&E unit which faces being downgraded

Despite the concessions made over Lewisham's A&E unit, the changes could still have a profound impact on health care in this corner of London - and the whole NHS for that matter.

The official line is that the plan to change it to an urgent care centre has been stopped by ministers who have listened to concerns.

But make no mistake the A&E - currently classed as a major type one unit - is still being downgraded.

The plan may only mean a quarter of the patients using the unit are affected as the rest will still be able to get the treatment they need from the service that emerges from the reorganisation.

But the absence of those quarter, who will end up being treated at nearby hospitals, will have a profound impact. They will be the sickest, most life-threatening cases who are ferried to hospital in ambulances.

Without them Lewisham will not need its critical care unit and perhaps a host of other associated services.

Hospitals are complex organisations. Removing one thing has a ripple effect across the rest of the hospital.

The plan means Lewisham starts to move away from what many would associate a hospital to be.

Instead, it will focus much more on planned care, such as knee and hip replacements, and non-emergency cases.

Only those who are at no immediate risk will be taken to Lewisham, this could include the elderly person who has had a fall and needs a little supervision to someone who has twisted their ankle.

'Dangerous precedent'

But this shift is not unique to this area of south London.

Up-and-down the country similar issues are arising.

Specialist care, from dealing with strokes to carrying out heart surgery, is getting more complex. It means it has to be provided at fewer sites where highly-trained teams of staff can be concentrated.

When is an A&E unit not an A&E unit?

  • There are three types of A&E unit - type one, two and three.
  • Lewisham Hospital's A&E is currently classed as a type one major unit.
  • That means it is equipped to deal with life-threatening cases.
  • Type two units are linked to specialist hospitals, so while they deal with emergencies they are not for the general patient.
  • A type three unit, which it will become under the plans, is not. Instead, they deal with minor complaints.
  • Some type three units are referred to as A&E units, but others - especially the newly built ones - are called minor injury units or urgent care centres.
  • Ministers announced on Thursday that they would over-ride the administrator's recommendation that Lewisham should not be allowed to admit patients.
  • This, they said, meant the A&E unit was being saved.
  • But that does not alter its status as a type three unit. The only patients it will be allowed to admit will be those with minor injuries that may need a little supervision.
  • Some urgent care centres admit too, some do not. They could have simply called it an admitting urgent care centre if they had wanted to.

That shift has already started happening. But it is one of the reasons why there are NHS trusts across the country that are struggling to balance the books.

There are another 20 or so trusts with deep-rooted problems that mean their finances are at risk of spiralling out of control.

None have quite built up the scale of problems that south London has. But that does not mean they are not closely watching what is happening and wondering if they will be next.

But the controversy over Lewisham also raises the question of how best these changes - or reconfigurations as the NHS calls them - should happen.

Central to the complaints of Lewisham residents and indeed many of the health staff working at the hospital is that they are being penalised because of the problems built up at another trust.

Lewisham is not part of South London Healthcare, the financially-troubled trust that was put into administration.

Instead, it found itself involved after the administrator brought in to sort out the problems concluded he needed to look at the wider local health economy rather than one individual trust.

Shadow health secretary Andy Burham has claimed this represents a "dangerous precedent".

But one of the attractions of the administration process - which was created by Labour when they were in power - is that it is quick.

Other reconfigurations that have not used legislation, such as in places like Greater Manchester, have taken years to push through.

But that timescale means problems fester and mount.

Chris Ham, head of the influential King's Fund think-tank, says resorting to such measures should be a "last resort and must not become a back-door route" to change.

He and many others are calling for an open and honest debate about the future of healthcare and hospitals in particular.

What is happening now in south London could define if and how that debate happens.

 
Nick Triggle Article written by Nick Triggle Nick Triggle Health correspondent

What is the NHS there for?

Dementia patients effectively face a "care tax", campaigners say, because two thirds of their care is not provided by the state. But unfortunately there are no easy solutions, says Nick Triggle.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Nick

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 95.

    Attending a North West London A&E recently: The guy in-change came out and said - twice - there will be very long waits (signs were inoperative) and could anyone who could, please go elsewhere.

    But how long are the waits at other near A&Es! Nobody knows!

    This gives me the idea that all A&Es should show their waiting time live on-line so those needing to go can pick the shortest time.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 94.

    Watch out the Drs who'll hopefully be standing for Parliament at the next election - if all goes according to plan in every constituency where the sitting MP voted in favour of defcto privatisation of the NHS there'll be a Dr standing for election.

    Use the opportunity to vote for them next time & show the existing parliament what we really think of theit obfuscation over our health service.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 93.

    Backdoor privatisation. This government has obviously decided that the state must not have responsibility for anything other than collecting taxes. This sort of thing is effectively saying that unless you can afford healthcare then you will not get it. How can you put a price on someone's health? It is morally wrong and makes me angry.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 92.

    All 3 major parties are determined to dismantle the NHS.
    The best hope for people affected by the Lewisham decision is to put up and vote for an NHS candidate at the next election. This is the only way they will save their hospital because no matter what Labour Tory or Lib Dems say they will all destroy the medical treatment available to Joe Public. You will all have a pay for what you get system

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 91.

    88.Mike from Brum


    If GPs are on to such a good thing how come there is a bigger shortage of GPs in the UK today than there is for any other specialism within the profession...???

 

Comments 5 of 95

 

Features & Analysis

BBC Future

(Getty Images)

How to train a tougher mind

Secrets of coping with extreme stress Read more...

Programmes

  • Three men solving a puzzleThe Travel Show Watch

    Why tourists are heading to Budapest for the chance to break out of a room

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.