How did it go so wrong?

Medical records

There comes a point when the weight of criticism becomes so much that the dam bursts.

For NHS England - and its project - that point was reached on Tuesday.

When you have a group of bodies as disparate as the British Medical Association, privacy campaign group Big Brother Watch and the Association of Medical Research Charities united in their condemnation, you know you have a problem.

The organisation has defused the problem for now by agreeing to delay the data-sharing project by six months.

But how did it get to this point? After all, the concept of the giant database has the backing of almost the entire medical community, many charities and some of the most influential patient groups.

What is

When it is compiled, will be a giant database of medical records showing how individuals have been cared for across the GP and hospital sectors.

Researchers believe the information will be vital in helping them develop new treatments as well as assessing the performance of NHS services.

The records will be pseudonymised, which means the identifiable data has been taken out. Instead, it will just contain the patient's age range, gender and area they live in.

However, researchers can apply for those safeguards to be lifted in exceptional circumstances, such as during an epidemic. This will need the permission of the health secretary.

While the furore over the scheme may have only exploded into life since Christmas, the actual idea has been 25 years in the making.

Since 1989, the NHS has been collecting data on hospital stays, known as hospital episode statistics (HES).

This has proved invaluable. For example, HES data played a role in uncovering both the Bristol heart and Mid-Staffordshire scandals.

It also provided some of the evidence that led to the introduction of targeted bowel cancer screening in 2006.

The idea with is to expand this database to include what happens to patients when they are under the care of GPs.

The belief is this could help researchers develop new treatments and improve the monitoring of performance.

But most would argue none of this was communicated by NHS England.

Video animation

Instead, the organisation focused its attention on a leaflet drop of every household in England.

The problem was many people could not recall getting them - a BBC poll last week suggested as many as two-thirds of the public had not seen them come through their letterboxes.

It is not clear exactly what happened here. NHS England says it agreed a deal with Royal Mail that they would hit 99% of households - the industry-considered standard for national mailouts - and the leaflets would not be nestled inside other mail.

But reports have emerged of them being found tucked inside pizza menus and other junk mail.

NHS England video about patient data plans

NHS England is now in discussions with Royal Mail to find out what happened.

A video animation was also produced (the video is on the right), but it went only on YouTube and NHS England's website.

There was no national TV campaign.

Nor was a press conference called to launch the marketing campaign.

That is unusual for a project on this scale.

Officials at the Department of Health, which until a year ago was in charge of the day-to-day running of the NHS, have told me they would never have run it like this.

'Hard sell'

Questions have also been asked about why a decision has yet to be taken about what some consider the most controversial aspect of the project - the sharing of data with private companies.

This will not be decided until a meeting in March. It meant the public were being asked whether they wanted to opt out without knowing who was going to get access to their largely anonymised medical records.

Unsurprisingly, there is now a lot of soul-searching at NHS England.

The organisation admits it made mistakes - particularly in not doing enough to explain the benefits of

Some of the explanations offered are understandable. For example, there was a desire not to spend too much on marketing at a time when front-line budgets are being squeezed.

However, the challenge now for NHS England is to work out how they can move on.

One suggestion is that big money should be spent on a TV and radio campaign - although this could be seen as a "hard sell".

Some believe personalised letters should be delivered to households instead of the generic leaflets.

NHS England is also likely to explore the possibility of getting other organisations, such as patient groups and well-known charities, involved in explaining the scheme.

But the fear now inside the organisation - and among the many supporters of - is that the concept has become so tarnished that whatever is done now will be wrong.

Nick Triggle Article written by Nick Triggle Nick Triggle Health correspondent

Is another NHS scandal brewing?

The Morecambe Bay inquiry has chilling echoes of one into Stafford Hospital. So could there be another scandal happening elsewhere?

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Nick


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 354.

    351.Damien "In principle is a brilliant"

    Oh yea...

    What if the data is less that ideally accurate - rubbish in fact?

    How wonderful is it then?

  • rate this

    Comment number 353.

    I may be naive but is not full informed written consent required or does this high handed approach apply in this circumstance? plus as yet I have to see any mention of how you actually opt out. No I do not want my information in the hands of private companies particularly by this means, I require to be fully infomed then as of right I will make the descision thank you!

  • rate this

    Comment number 352.

    George Orwell was right....
    Too many people need to know everything.
    Even if the info is trivial.
    Fail to see why anyone should ever be interested in who I would want to vote for.

  • rate this

    Comment number 351.

    In principle is a brilliant development eg if I travel elsewhere in the UK and have a health problem, my medical records/history could be immediately accessed by the NHS professionals treating me.For research too it's invaluable.The problems stem from a Tory-led govt too aligned with private sector interests(pharmaceutical;insurance)due to Party funding.Hence the mistrust.Rightly so.

  • rate this

    Comment number 350.

    To be honest and reflecting on the aggregate comments, the very best outcome is for all medical records to be handed over to patients with a label on the front saying take this to your healthcare provider, the NHS closed for business yesterday as you did not trust, you despise doctors and deride the support staff. If you are a taxpayer you will get an absolutely huge tax reduction.


Comments 5 of 354


Features & Analysis

  • Cartoon of women chatting on the metroChat wagon

    The interesting things you hear in a women-only carriage

  • Replica of a cargo boxSpecial delivery

    The man who posted himself to the other side of the world

  • Music scoreFinal score Watch

    Goodbye to NYC's last classical sheet music shop

  • Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton checks her Blackberry from a desk inside a C-17 military plane upon her departure from Malta, in the Mediterranean Sea, bound for Tripoli, Libya'Emailgate'

    Hillary gets a taste of scrutiny that lies ahead

BBC Future

What's life like when you get drunk on rice and potato? (Getty Images)

The man who gets drunk on chips

He brews beer inside his belly


  • A cyborg cockroachClick Watch

    The cyborg cockroach – why has a computer been attached to this insect’s nervous system?

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.