Warning over electrical brain stimulation

 
electric brain

Related Stories

Given the option, would you want to think faster and have sharper attention? Research suggests that electrical brain stimulation kits could have just those effects. But now some companies are selling such devices online, leading to calls to regulate the technology.

It may sound too good to be true but scientists say the technology is promising.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS), which passes small electrical currents directly on to the scalp, stimulates the nerve cells in the brain (neurons).

It's non-invasive, extremely mild and the US military even uses TDCS in an attempt to improve the performance of its drone pilots.

Start Quote

You need to know how long to stimulate, at what time to stimulate and what intensity to use”

End Quote Dr Roy Cohen Kadosh University of Oxford

The idea is that it makes the neurons more likely to fire and preliminary research suggests electrical simulation can improve attention as well as have a positive impact on people with cognitive impairments and depression.

It has also been shown to increase performance in a maths task, an improvement which was still in place six months later.

The scientist behind this work is Dr Roy Cohen Kadosh from the University of Oxford. He uses TDCS to look at how cognitive functions improve.

Dr Hannah Maslen explains why her team wants to regulate TDCS devices

He says: "Research has shown that by delivering electricity to the right part of the brain, we can change the threshold of neurons that transmit information in our brain, and by doing that we can improve cognitive abilities in different types of psychological functions."

Studies like his are perhaps why commercial companies are jumping on the technology and largely promoting it as a way to help gamers get ahead.

"A headset for gamers, take charge... Overclock your brain," is how one company promotes it. Another states: "Can you learn 20-40% quicker, reduce pain, feel better, increase energy or reduce stress with tDCS? Research studies say, YES!"

'Unintended results'

But if these devices are used in the wrong way, scientists say they could be harmful.

"If they make claims about gaming, that is very far removed from the sort of treatment claims that might be to do with helping stroke patients or people suffering from depression," warns Hannah Maslen from the Oxford Martin School at Oxford University.

The electrodes of one device seen by the Oxford Martin School (below) are positioned so they stimulate the area of the brain under the forehead.

Foc.us device worn by Oxford University Researcher Hannah Maslen

This is where the pre-frontal cortex is situated, involved in high-level cognition such as attention.

But in Dr Cohen Kadosh's lab, electrical stimulation is used in a controlled environment for no more than 20 minutes at a time and only on participants who have passed strict medical checks.

Scientists are, after all, applying electrodes to the brain - which they say could have some unintended results.

For example, different brain regions than those intended might be affected and, in some instances, stimulation could impair rather than improve function if the polarity of the stimulation is reversed.

Dr Cohen Kadosh says: "You can use stimulation that might not be beneficial for you, you need to know how long to stimulate, at what time to stimulate and what intensity to use."

Recently, another team of researchers have pleaded for "calm and caution" for these devices when it comes to the developing brain because of the known risks. These can include seizures and mood changes.

Author of this work, Nick Davis from Swansea University, explains that because the brain continues to develop until the age of 20, stimulation in this age group would have a stronger impact.

Cognitive enhancement device in the lab Electrical stimulation devices at Oxford University can have currents placed on various parts of the brain

And more worryingly for him, people are also increasingly making brain stimulation kits themselves. This easily "puts the technology in the realms of clever teenagers," adds Dr Davis.

An active forum on reddit is devoted to the technology, and people there have complained of "burning to the scalp". Another user wrote that they "seemed to be getting angry frequently" after using TDCS.

"These are the people who are probably going to do it at a higher dosage than a scientist or clinician would give to a patient and are less aware of the potential risks," says Dr Davis.

Exploiting hype

These sorts of issues are why a team from the Oxford Martin school at Oxford University is now calling calling for regulation of the commercially sold devices.

foc.us manual

One company selling the devices, foc.us, sent the Oxford Martin School a device for their research.

In its manual, it warns that those under 18 and those with existing health conditions such as epilepsy should not use the device. It says to watch out for side-effects including white-flashes, nausea, headache and fatigue. It also warns to look out for tingling and redness.

It says: "If you see white flashes (known as phosphenes), adjust the position of the foc.us headset away from your eyes".

The BBC tried to contact foc.us for further comment but did not receive a reply.

Lead author of this paper, Dr Maslen, explains that as they are marketed to gamers and do not make any treatment claims, they avoid the need for regulation.

"If you were to make a treatment claim, that the device would alleviate symptoms or treat a recognised disease or illness, the device would automatically fall under the medical devices directive and the legislation associated with that."

Her team does not want to restrict access to cognitive enhancement devices but wants consumers to have "the information they need to assess what risks they are willing to take in pursuit of which potential benefits".

Another concern is that the science behind these devices is not ready for the commercial market, something Steven Novella a neurologist at Yale University has raised. He says that companies are jumping on the hype of research that is not quite ready for the world because it "sounds very advanced and sexy".

"There's lots of published evidence that could make it seem as if these are proven therapies but I think the marketing is a couple of steps ahead of the science.

"Any device with medical claims that it's meant to affect our biological function should be appropriately regulated. Regulation is the only thing that creates the motivation to spend the money and take the time to do the proper research," he adds.

Suggestions of increased attention and the alleviation of certain medical conditions means interest in electrical stimulation is bound to increase but if the research continues to show promising results it's clear that TDCS will need to be treated with some caution.

Follow Melissa on twitter

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 111.

    Never ceases to amaze me that people have such low regard for their health. Pleasure or performance enhancing drugs or other stimulation have invariably been shown to have detrimental effects.
    Even so I am against prohibition of anything that has no effect on anyone other than the user. I am not my brother's keeper.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 90.

    TCDS has been shown to have a positive effect on stroke patients and so there is probably some scientific basis for this device but I would not want to be the Guinea pig. In particular how does this device react with cochlear implants or for people suffering with epilepsy etc. I guess selling this device to the general public could be akin to a clinical trial of sorts if it is properly monitored.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 44.

    The problem with regulating something like this is that anyone with £20 & a nearby Maplin can make one at home.

    If there truly are benefits, and the research suggests that there are, then people will buy/make devices. So the best thing to do is give enough information so that people can do so as safely as possible. Heavy handed regulation will not work.

  • rate this
    +11

    Comment number 30.

    I wonder how much of this is down to the placebo effect, or simply as a result of you buying the machine.

    After all, if you're willing to go and spend extra money on a device, you're probably going to expend extra effort to help you concentrate.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 28.

    the devices need to be regulated as a poorly-made or damaged machine could potentially cause damage. also do we know if there are health risks or what the safe exposure times to these devices are?

 
 

More Health stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

  • Toronto Mayor Rob FordFord nation

    Toronto mayor's enemies unite with him in new battle


  • Tattooed person using tabletRogue ink

    People who lost their jobs because of their tattoos


  • Climate change protestersBig deal or big dud?

    Success of massive climate march remains in doubt


  • An ant and a humanAnts v humans

    Do all the world's ants really weigh as much as all the humans?


BBC Future

(Thinkstock)

How supermarkets can trick us

Hidden ways to make you pick healthy food Read more...

Programmes

  • TokyoThe Travel Show Watch

    Japan has a reputation for being expensive but can you visit without breaking the bank?

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.