A Point of View: A time when violence is normal

Voodoo doll with pins on a corkboard

Chaos and carnage hover over the novels of Cormac McCarthy and the writings of thinker Thomas Hobbes. It's not a love of domination that makes people violent, but the need for safety, says philosopher John Gray.

(Spoiler alert: Key plot details revealed below)

"War is god".

This is the sermon preached by "the judge", one of the central characters in Blood Meridian, a visionary novel by the American writer Cormac McCarthy.

Set in the Texas-Mexico borderlands in the mid-19th Century, the book records the experience of a runaway, a teenage boy described throughout as "the kid", who falls in with a gang of bandits who make a predatory living by killing the region's Apache Indians in order to claim a bounty on the scalps.

Led by a former US army officer and mercenary, the band of scalp-hunters actually operated in the American Southwest at the time the novel is set, preying on Mexicans and Americans as well as the indigenous population until an Indian raid put an end to it, killing and scalping the gang's leader and most of its members.

The novel recounts the kid's life with the marauders, and ends with him - by then a man - apparently being killed by the judge in an outhouse of a Texas saloon.

Find out more

John Gray
  • John Gray is a political philosopher and author of False Dawn: The Delusions of Global Capitalism

An unremitting chronicle of gruesome savagery, Blood Meridian has been read as a subversive take-down of the traditional Western novel, an indictment of the idea of Manifest Destiny - the belief that the Anglo-Saxon race was destined to conquer the American continent - and a fictional meditation on the nature of evil.

It is all of these things, but more than anything else, it seems to me, the book recreates a time when violence was normal.

Here in Britain - and to a lesser extent in Europe and America - we tend to think of violence as an interruption of civilised existence.

It is hard to square this with the history of the 20th Century, when Europe was a site of mass killing on an unprecedented scale and vicious colonial wars were fought in Africa and South East Asia.

Today images of carnage most recently in Syria, and also in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and other places, are broadcast continuously in the 24-hour media.

The vast, industrial-style wars of the last century may have been left behind. But they have been followed by other forms of human conflict, in their way no less destructive. No longer simply a battle between states, war has become - as it was in the time of Blood Meridian - a deadly struggle among and within peoples.

Human beings use violence in many forms for a multitude of different reasons:

  • to defend themselves from attack
  • seize wealth and natural resources
  • impose their beliefs on others
  • protest intolerable injustice
  • and at times simply to find temporary relief from boredom.
General George Crook, third from right (1829 - 1890) holds council with Apache leader Geronimo, centre left (1829 - 1909) for a three day conference at Canyon de los Embudos, Sierra Madre. Seeking peace in 19th Century America

Yet many people want to believe that human beings are essentially peaceable creatures, who turn on one another only when they have no other alternative. Violence, these people insist, is contrary to our strongest needs and impulses, which lead us to live and work together - in other words, humans are naturally predisposed to be civilised.

A canonical statement of this view was presented by a thinker commonly regarded as having a grimly realistic view of human beings, the 17th Century philosopher Thomas Hobbes.

Cormac McCarthy

Samuel L Jackson and Cormac McCarthy

Cormac McCarthy (pictured right, with actor Samuel L Jackson) was born in Rhode Island, July 1933.

He studied Liberal Arts at the University of Tennessee, 1951-2. He served for four years in US air force.

The Orchard Keeper - his first book - was published in 1965.

Blood Meridian came out in 1985.

All the Pretty Horses was published 1992 and achieved immediate success.

McCarthy's novel No Country for Old Men was published in 2005 and later adapted for the screen by Joel and Ethan Coen.

The Road won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction in 2007 and turned into the 2009 film of the same name.

When you hear the term Hobbesian, you think of people at each other's throats, struggling for power in a situation of chaos. This is what Hobbes called a "war of all against all".

"In the first place," the philosopher famously wrote, "I put for a general inclination of all mankind, a perpetual inclination of all mankind for power after power, that ceaseth only in death... Where there is no common power, there is no law, where no law, no injustice... No arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death: and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short."

These lines from Leviathan - Hobbes' best-known work and a masterpiece of English prose - have been read as meaning that humans are by nature violent animals.

Their true meaning is virtually the opposite. A bold thinker but a timid man: "I was born a twin to fear," he confessed. Hobbes believed that humans are driven to attack and prey on one another mainly by fear of uncertainty. It's not a love of domination that makes people violent, but an overpowering need for safety.

This isn't the only impulse that impels humans to be violent - Hobbes also mentions the desire for gain and the love of glory - but it is fundamental in his account of how they escape from violence.

Moved by a combination of reason and fear, Hobbes believed, human beings will contract with each other to create a sovereign - an absolute ruler who will prevent any slide into anarchy.

Under the shelter of strong government, humankind can enjoy "commodious living" - Hobbes' term for a civilised mode of life in which we can live and work together without fear.

Interpreted as a metaphor rather than a literal account of events, there is a good deal of truth in Hobbes' story. In historical crises, people have often looked to strong leaders to deliver society from anarchy.

Lenin's dictatorship was welcomed, at least to begin with, by Russians who opposed his programme because they hoped he would install some kind of order. In interwar Europe, dictatorship was popular in many countries because it seemed to offer a way out from economic and social chaos.

Lenin addressing masses Many Russians thought Lenin's dictatorship would install order

Yet there have been many cases when human beings have adapted to violence for long periods. During China's era of warring states, and Europe after the fall of Rome, violence was at high levels for centuries.

A chronic state of lawlessness existed in large parts of North America throughout much of the 19th Century.

The same has been true in Lebanon, parts of Africa and some countries in Latin America. While humankind may fear violence, human beings have often learnt to live with it.

Blood Meridian has been interpreted as presenting a Hobbesian view of human nature, but what it shows is something that Hobbes did not envision - violence as a way of life.

As McCarthy presents them, violence does more for the gang than enable them to prey on others. It gave their lives - poor, nasty and short as they were - a kind of sense and significance.

For Hobbes, human beings are solitary creatures, who want nothing more than simply to go on living.

Tyres burn in the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli People often learn to live with violence

But we are not isolated individuals. We live in groups, and some of our best and worst qualities come from the need to form bonds with others. People will readily give up their lives to protect their children, while McCarthy's gang embodies a savage kind of solidarity in which its members fight, kill and die together.

Again, for Hobbes the only reason for killing is to pre-empt being killed yourself. But terrorists who go to certain death in order to wreak death on others do not do so for the sake of self-preservation.

What they are preserving is an image of themselves as part of a group or a cause, without which they feel aimless and empty.

In a passage in Leviathan that undermines much of the rest of the book, Hobbes writes of "the privilege of absurdity; to which no living creature is subject, but man only".

Here Hobbes was right. Humans alone among the animals are ready to kill and be killed in order to secure a meaning in their lives.

Where he went wrong was in thinking that violence can be tamed principally by the use of reason, an illusion of the European Enlightenment, of which Hobbes was one of the first great exponents.

We cannot escape the "war of all against all" by any kind of contract. Learnt slowly and painfully, the practices of civilised life are permanently fragile and precarious. Here the visionary novelist is more realistic than the rationalist philosopher.

Violence cannot be eradicated, because its ultimate source is in the warring impulses and fantasies of human beings.

This is the truth conveyed in McCarthy's great novel - civilisation is natural for human beings, but so is barbarism.

A selection of your comments are published below.

Blood Meridian is undoubtedly a classic of English prose in the genre of those works that seek to articulate the ligament between savagery and civilisation. There is a stronger force than any of the motives for violence articulated in the article however, one expounded in Steve Eriskson's novel The Sea Came In At Midnight - this is the internal momentum of a narrative, or put more bluntly, the way we hear stories and then supply those stories with ourselves as actors to make them incarnate. This is how language and art drives civilisation, as Nietzsche observes, artists are the primary legislators of value.

Lawrence Toms, Penarth

It can be argued that civilisation is created and maintained by the imposition of order by those that achieve power upon those with less power, either through violence or the threat of violence together with other sanctions. Blood Meridian's gang of scalphunters stand out for their level of violence, even by the standards of their times. Their leader, Glanton, was a US Army deserter who had shot a fellow soldier in a dispute. The Glanton gang ended up killing many irrespective of race or age in their attempts to sell scalps. Those that had hired them turned against them and they had made many other enemies. Blood Meridian can be seen as a cautionary tale: those that live by the sword, die by the sword.

Jay Furneaux, Sheffield

John Gray states "Violence cannot be eradicated, because its ultimate source is in the warring impulses and fantasies of human beings". I would challenge this on at least two ground. First, what is a "warring impulse"? War is a collective action, planned and executed as a group activity. It's hard to see how this is an "impulse"; rather, it is the encouragement and channelling of violent impulses towards a particular end. If the argument therefore runs that violence cannot be eradicated because its ultimate source is in the violent impulses and fantasies of human beings, that statement can also be challenged, as Stephen Pinker does in his book The Better Angels of Our Nature. Violence has actually been reduced throughout history and in many situations eradicated. It is always there as a potential, of course, but increasingly human beings have learnt not to use it, for all sorts of reasons - morality, empathy, pragmatism and so on.

E Canfor-Dumas, Bushey

To die for your beliefs is is among the highest aspects of mankind. To kill for your beliefs is the lowest.

Brian O'Donnell, Edinburgh

I think Thomas Hobbes was probably right in thinking that violence stems primarily from fear - most people who engage in violence do so because they feel they have no choice but to fight in order to protect themselves and their interests. However, it is interesting that the existential philosophy which followed the Enlightenment emphasised freedom of choice as an essential part of being human. Where people are truly empowered to make choices in their lives, they generally choose peace and not violence. Such freedom can only be achieved in the context of mutually respectful relationships. Of course these relationships are potentially fragile, especially when threatened by those who have not yet been able to rise above their self-protective instincts. But in the end, surely a world where we protect each other's interest is life-enriching, results in happier people and is worth working hard to achieve. Let's choose to leave violence behind and consign it to our evolution.

John Davis, Reading,

Great piece. I suppose violence does largely come from fear (if you look at the events in Syria recently) though there does need to be adequate mention of the element of greed - and also psychological sadism which the article does not tackle in any depth. The thing about great violence is that it can be sickeningly horrific one minute, "normal" the next i.e. it HAS happened, what could previously only have been considered a nightmare. And humans are so adaptable, are they not? Thinking about what happened it the 20th century World Wars (and having watched 'Passchendaele' on the BBC last week, and thinking also of the Eastern Front in WW2) I am sure a lot of the barbarism of war is down to that primitive terror and instinct for self-preservation.

Bran, Workington

Ants have been known to sacrifice themselves for the sake of the colony, so we are not unique in this.

Maggie Powell, Glasgow

An interesting if bleak analysis which captures the essence of the human predicament, but I have a few objections as to John Gray's statement that, "Here in Britain - and to a lesser extent in Europe and America - we tend to think of violence as an interruption of civilised existence." We tend to think of violence in the same way in Sweden; it has not been "normalised" and it is no more accepted there than anywhere else. What is it about Britain that makes it exceptional in this case?

Fredrik Kinell, London

More on This Story

Features & Analysis

  • Stained glass of man with swordFrance 1 England 0

    The most important battle you have probably never heard of


  • Golden retriever10 things

    Dogs get jealous, and nine more nuggets from the week's news


  • Pro-Israel demonstrators shout slogans while protesting in Berlin - 25 July 2014Holocaust guilt

    Gaza conflict leaves Germans confused over who to support


  • The emir of Kuwait Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad al-Jaber al-SabahFreedoms fear

    Growing concern for rights as Kuwait revokes citizenships


Elsewhere on the BBC

  • CastleRoyal real estate

    No longer reserved for kings and queens, some find living in a castle simply divine

Programmes

  • Leader of Hamas Khaled MeshaalHARDtalk Watch

    BBC exclusive: Hamas leader on the eagerness to end bloodshed in Gaza

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.