Is the toilet seat really the dirtiest place in the home?

toilet seat

The toilet seat has acquired an unfair reputation as the dirtiest item in the average household. But scientists say there are far filthier places in our house, some of them where we least expect.

Would you chop your vegetables on your toilet seat? I think pretty much all of us would say No. But maybe we should think again.

Dr Chuck Gerba, professor of microbiology at the University of Arizona, studies how diseases are transferred through the environment. This involves swabbing household items and measuring how many bacteria - and what sort - develop.

He particularly looks for faecal bacteria such as E.coli and staphylococcus aureus.

His studies have found that on the average toilet seat there are 50 bacteria per square inch.

A new benchmark

The toilet seat is now regularly used as a unit of dirt.

"Now hear this! Your cellphone is as dirty as a toilet seat," writes the New York Post.

"Which? found that the keyboards at its London offices contained up to five times more germs than a toilet seat," reports the Daily Mail.

"Keyboards can carry more than 200 times as many bacteria as a toilet seat," says USA Today.

"It's one of the cleanest things you'll run across in terms of micro-organisms," he says. "It's our gold standard - there are not many things cleaner than a toilet seat when it comes to germs."

We should be more worried about other household items, it seems.

"Usually there are about 200 times more faecal bacteria on the average cutting board than on a toilet seat," he says.

In the kitchen it doesn't necessarily get there through actual contact with faeces. It comes via raw meat products or the viscera from inside of the animal, where a lot of the faecal bacteria originate.

Chopping board

Would Gerba be more inclined to chop his vegetables on a toilet seat then?

More or Less: Behind the stats

Listen to More or Less on BBC Radio 4 and the World Service, or download the free podcast. The programme returns to Radio 4 on Friday at 16:30.

"It would seem a safer place," he says. "Not that I would recommend it, but you might treat your cutting board a bit more like you do your toilet seat."

It's because we all fear the dirtiness of the toilet seat so much that we regularly clean it, so perhaps this is the course of action we need to take with our chopping boards.

But the filthiest culprit in our homes is the kitchen sponge or cloth.

E.coli

E.coli
  • Short for Escherichia coli - type of bacterium present in gut of humans and other animals
  • E.coli infection happens when mutant strains are introduced to body, usually through food
  • 119 people were infected during E.coli outbreak in Northern Ireland last month; 14 people died in Germany in 2011 after outbreak caused by cucumbers

According to Gerba, there are about 10 million bacteria per square inch on a sponge, and a million on a dishcloth.

In other words, a kitchen sponge is 200,000 times dirtier than a toilet seat, and a dishcloth is 20,000 times dirtier.

This is the same the world over.

"Always the dirtiest thing by far is the kitchen sponge," says John Oxford, professor of virology at the University of London and chair of the Hygiene Council - an international body that compares hygiene standards across the world.

Its latest study examines samples from homes in nine different countries, and finds that 21% of "visibly clean" kitchen cloths actually have high levels of contamination. The cloths also fail the bacterial test which looks for E.coli.

The study identifies faecal bacteria in other places around the home, and this varies from one country to another.

Saudi Arabia has the dirtiest fridges, with 95% of the fridges in the study failing the bacteriology test for E.coli. And in South Africa, the dirtiest item is the seal in the bath, with almost two-thirds with unsatisfactory levels of E.coli and 40% for mould.

Household hygiene

  • 2010 Hygiene in the Home Study tested 180 homes in Australia, Canada, Germany, India, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, UK and US
  • Bathroom seals caused most concern, with 70% failing bacterial tests
  • Fridge interiors came second - more than 40% of homes failed tests on bacteria and mould build-up
  • Kitchen towels were found to be unsatisfactory or unacceptably dirty in 36% of homes
  • Cleanest surface tested was pushchair with only 6% failing bacterial tests

"It's always a bit delicate which countries are the worst," says Oxford.

"We found that countries like Australia and particularly Canada are high up on the hygiene list... Countries near the bottom are fairly routinely, unfortunately, India and Malaysia."

What about away from our homes? Gerba says the office is particularly bad.

"Many people don't realise they're talking dirty every time they pick up their phone, because they never clean it. "The average desktop has 400 times more bacteria than on a toilet seat."

Beware the supermarket too.

bagforlife

"Shopping trolleys are really bad," warns Gerba. What's more, about half of reusable shopping bags have faecal bacteria in them.

"Some people have more faecal bacteria in their grocery bag than in their underwear, because they at least wash that."

So what does this actually mean for us in terms of health risks?

Previously in the Magazine

sign

Faecal matter can be found on just over a quarter of our hands, new research suggests. In some cases the quantity of germs is equivalent to the number in a dirty toilet bowl. So why are the British so bad at washing their hands?

"These numbers of bacteria, particularly for E.coli, are huge," says Oxford.

"E.coli is an indicator bacterium. It may not itself cause horrible disease, but it indicates faeces is around and that might contain other organisms like salmonella and shigella which really are virulently pathogenic."

But we all touch these perhaps startlingly dirty things every day, and on the whole we don't get constantly ill.

"We're jolly lucky that as we've evolved over two million years, we have a whole set of genes whose only function is to get the immune system in action," says Oxford.

"All of us, in all these countries we have gone to, rely on Lady Luck too much, keeping our fingers crossed or sitting on our hands. In a modern scientific society, what we want is people to realise there's a problem here and take action."

Disclaimer: Charlotte Pritchard and the BBC do not recommend chopping any sort of food on your toilet seat.

More on This Story

In today's Magazine

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • OrchestraSound of success

    How one of Turkey’s finest orchestras found global fame

Programmes

  • Ladybird - a robot designed to help with farm workClick Watch

    From weed detecting to a robotic dairy - the tech that could help farmers be more efficient

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.