Activists' pressure 'slowing animal imports'

 
Mouse on a microscope Every year some 15,000 animals - mostly mice - are shipped into the UK for research

Related Stories

Some leading scientists are warning pressure from animal rights activists is reducing the number of animals being brought into Britain for research.

All ferry companies and all but two airlines have stopped importing animals destined for research laboratories.

Former science minister Lord Drayson said that without such research "it is not possible to develop new medicines".

But animal rights group Peta said 90% of drugs that passed animal trials failed when given to people.

Every year some 15,000 animals - mostly mice - are shipped in from abroad - usually because they have particular traits that make them useful for the study of certain conditions. They account for 1% of the animals used in UK laboratories.

Lord Drayson, who was a minister under the last Labour government, said animal research was "regrettably" necessary and that people would "suffer and die" without it.

"If we do want to have access to medicines, and I believe that we do - more than 87% of the general public consistently over the last 10 years in polling have said that they support animal research for medical uses. And so unfortunately we do have to do this."

Start Quote

Our problem is they can't be put in a suitable transport and just driven from country to country because we have the Channel in the way”

End Quote Dominic Wells Royal Veterinary College

However, Alistair Currie from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Peta) said researchers should work harder to come up with alternatives to animal testing.

"More than 90% of drugs that pass trials in animals fail when they're given to people," he said.

"They either prove to be unsafe or simply ineffective.

"And what we're actually seeing at the moment is over the last 15 years or so the number of animals tested is going up but the number of drugs coming out at the other end are actually going down."

The BBC's Tom Fielden says animal rights campaigners have been jailed for taking direct action against laboratories in the past and more recently have focused on creating bad PR.

He says this has included letter-writing and web-based campaigns against transport companies, which appear to have had an effect.

'Collaborative research'

BBC science editor David Shukman says the move by transport companies is a potentially serious blow to Britain's standing as a major centre of research into serious diseases.

Our correspondent says the two airlines still carrying live animals use circuitous routes that make the journeys longer.

He says until now this has all been kept secret.

But the scientists who depend on the animals for their work have now decided to speak out, to try to persuade the government and the transport companies to stand up to the campaigners.

Rhesus macaques Macaques are among the primates most often used in medical research, such as on HIV vaccines

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge, a geneticist at the National Institute for Medical Research, told the BBC it was vital scientists were able to import animals, so they could collaborate with colleagues abroad.

"That's very important - that you work with the same, try to understand, the same animal. This can be for assay development, where you need to have the same animal to test drugs and to compare drugs with other people working in other countries.

"And there are also cases where it's not cost effective for there to be lots of little animal breeding companies - so you'll have one big, very well maintained animal breeding company outside of the UK."

Dominic Wells of the Royal Veterinary College agreed.

"It's now getting to the point where enough companies have been intimidated and have refused to transport animals that we can see a potential worldwide impact of having problems of transporting animals between labs that will massively impact on the collaborative nature of research and will slow research progress," he said.

"Our problem is they can't be put in a suitable transport and just driven from country to country because we have the Channel in the way.

"And so with the blockade that is rapidly developing we're essentially going to be isolated from the rest of Europe and that's will have a huge impact on UK competitiveness and the very good work that is done in an awful lot of UK labs."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 461.

    The industry keeps saying the UK has the best animal welfare laws in the world but they say that in every country! The Home Office only has around 30 inspectors overseeing almost 4 million experiements a year. There is no way for the public to verify laws are adhered to other than undercover investigators who invariably find wrongdoing including punching of animals and falsification of results.

  • rate this
    +12

    Comment number 443.

    No scientist wants to use animals in research but unfortunately that is the best system we have available. Cell models are only so useful, in the same way that animal models have their limits.
    Laboratory animals in the UK are extremely well looked after, often hundreds of times better than peoples pets.

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 442.

    I work in Regulatory for a top 10 Pharma company, animal safety and tox data is required by law to move into human testing. No government health authority will approve a study without this data, its not pharma companies testing on animals because its cheaper then a synthetic cell line test or computer simulation. Its not a choice its complying with EU law (not even just UK law).

  • rate this
    +15

    Comment number 369.

    How about a warning on the packaging of all prescription drugs – “This product HAS been tested on animals in order to make it safe and effective for your use. If you do not agree with animal testing, don’t take this medicine”.

  • rate this
    +81

    Comment number 113.

    animal research in the UK is heavily regulated for the welfare of all animals used, more so than in other countries. Making it harder to do such crucial work will only push the research to other countries where the welfare of the animals is not such a concern resulting in more animals being used.

 

Comments 5 of 12

 

More Science & Environment stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

BBC Future

(Thinkstock)

Why are most of us right-handed?

A vexing mystery of the human body Read more...

Programmes

  • Digital candlesClick Watch

    Inside the 'Harry Potter' church, using technology to explore "digital empathy".

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.