Doha climate talks: US faces dilemma over final text

 
NGO protests at the talks in Doha, Qatar Various NGOs have protested at the talks in Doha

Related Stories

There has been a historic shift in the UN climate talks in Qatar, with the prospect of rich nations having to compensate poor nations for losses due to climate change.

The US has fiercely opposed the measure - it says the cost could be unlimited.

But after angry tussles throughout the night the principle of Loss and Damage is now in the final negotiating text.

Small island states at risk from inundation say they will walk out if the US vetoes the proposed deal.

The political stakes are high. The EU's position is not yet well defined, but soundings suggest that it can live with the text.

The US will be seeking support from other big polluters - like Canada - likely to face liability for climate damages.

If the US is left alone fighting against the chair's text, its negotiators face a dilemma - either to bow to the majority and accept that the nations which caused climate change bear a moral responsibility to other nations damaged by it, or to refuse to sign.

If the US vetoes the text, President Barack Obama will be accused of hypocrisy and failure after re-committing himself to tackling climate change since his re-election.

Start Quote

"I will block this. I will shut this down”

End Quote Todd Stern US chief negotiator

If he agrees the text he will face criticism from Republicans, whilst he tries to negotiate his own deal over US government finances.

One campaign group in Doha tweeted that before the text was agreed Todd Stern, the US chief negotiator, was heard saying: "I will block this. I will shut this down."

Saleem ul-Huq, from the think-tank IIED, told the BBC: "This is a watershed in the talks. There is no turning back from this. It will be better for the US to realise that the principle of compensation is inevitable - and negotiate a limit on Loss and Damage rather than leave the liability unlimited.

"[President Obama] has just asked Congress for $60bn (£37bn) for the effects of Sandy - developed nations are already having to foot the bill for loss and damage of their own."

The Qatari chair has warned delegates that only a few hours remain to sign off the deal. He says the conference will not overrun by another day.

Principle at stake

It is a point of principle that is at stake here for developing countries. In the end it's questionable how much extra money a Loss and Damage Mechanism might bring.

Already poor nations are bitter that rich nations, particularly the US are dragging their feet over a promise made at the failed Copenhagen climate summit to mobilise $100bn by 2020 to help poor nations get clean energy and adapt to climate change.

The developing countries say the original sum was too low - especially in the light of Mr Obama's request to Congress for Sandy damages of $60bn, and the UK's bid to raise £200bn for clean energy by 2020.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 229.

    Politicians have been activelly pushing climate change as an excuse for raising revenues through carbon taxes, fuel surcharges etc for decades.

    They can't really complain when people claim compensation for damage caused by their cash cow.

  • rate this
    +12

    Comment number 122.

    Surely this must be addressed; that is the whole purpose of the talks.
    You can't have agreement in principle and then carry on polluting just because you have a powerful economy and a big industrial/military base.
    Wake up USA, China, Russia and all the other hangers on who value money more than their childrens' future.

  • rate this
    +15

    Comment number 86.

    I'm all for saving the environment for future generations, but with our competitors in China and India continuing to ignore environmental concerns, we're simply being outcompeted. We need tariffs on goods imported from heavy abusers of the environment so our own clean industries can compete!

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 49.

    Given the current catastrophic crisis with capitalism it seems ludicrous that the only solution politicians/leaders can agree on is to throw money at a problem instead of dealing with the route cause.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 13.

    I suppose one positive aspect of this bullying of the US is that they could reasonably use it to leverage China and India to do something about their ballooning emissions (and get them to drop their whining 'well you guys have been pumping out CO2 for centuries so we should be allowed to do so too')

 

Comments 5 of 6

 

More Science & Environment stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

  • Cerro RicoSatanic mines

    Devil worship in the tunnels of the man-eating mountain


  • Nefertiti MenoeWar of words

    The woman who sparked a row over 'speaking white'


  • Oil pumpPump change

    What would ending the US oil export ban do to petrol prices?


  • Brazilian Scene, Ceara, in 1893Sir Snapshot

    19th Century Brazil seen through the eyes of an Englishman


BBC Future

(Getty Images)

Why do we doodle?

Surprising origins of our drawing instinct Read more...

Programmes

  • European Union's anti-terrorism chief Gilles de KerchoveHARDtalk Watch

    Anti-terrorism chief Gilles de Kerchove on the threat from returning Islamic State fighters

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.