Fukushima nuclear plant set for risky operation


Rupert Wingfield-Hayes reports from inside reactor building four at Fukushima

A task of extraordinary delicacy and danger is about to begin at Japan's Fukushima nuclear power station.

Engineers are preparing to extract the first of thousands of nuclear fuel rods from one of the wrecked reactor buildings.

This is seen as an essential but risky step on the long road towards stabilising the site.

The fuel rods are currently in a precarious state in a storage pool in Unit 4.

This building was badly damaged by an explosion in March 2011 following the Great Tohoku earthquake and tsunami.

Moving the rods to safety is a high priority but has only become possible after months of repair work and planning.

One senior official told me: "It's going to be very difficult but it has to happen."

At the scene

When I visited Fukushima eight months ago, reactor building 4 was in a terrible state: a shattered concrete skeleton, terrifying to look at.

Today it has been transformed. A massive steel structure now envelopes the old building. Inside, I was able to look down into the deep green water of the cooling pool.

Clearly visible were the 1,500 uranium fuel rods - packed tightly together. Engineers have spent months carefully removing rubble and other debris from inside the pool.

Last month they did their first test, successfully pulling out one of the four-metre-long fuel assemblies. Now they say they are nearly ready to begin removing the rest.

It will be a difficult and delicate task and will take at least a year. But getting the 400 tonnes of radioactive fuel out of here into safe storage will be the first major step on the long road to making Fukushima safe.

The fuel rods are four-metre long tubes containing pellets of uranium fuel and the fear is that some may have been damaged during the disaster.

When the tsunami struck the Japanese coast, the flood swamped the diesel generators providing back up power to the reactors. Three of the reactors went into a state of partial meltdown.

By coincidence, Unit 4 was undergoing maintenance, so all of its fuel rods were being stored. But the meltdown of a neighbouring reactor led to a build-up of hydrogen which is believed to have led to the explosion in Unit 4.

In the days after the tsunami, there were fears that the blast had damaged Unit 4's storage pool and, in desperation, the authorities used helicopters and fire hoses to keep it filled with water.

A guiding principle of nuclear safety is that the fuel is kept underwater at all times - contact with the air risks overheating and triggering a release that could spread contamination.

So the operation to remove the rods will be painstaking.

A senior official in the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) told me that the rod assemblies will be lifted out in batches of 22 and in casks filled with water.

This will be done with a new crane, recently installed in the wrecked building, after the original one was destroyed.

Unit 4 Moving the rods has only become possible after months of repair work and planning

The task of removing each batch will take 7-10 days, I understand.

Two critically important issues are whether the rods themselves are damaged and therefore likely to leak and whether the casks remain watertight to ensure the rods have no contact with the air.

The METI official acknowledged the risks including a possible "release of radiation" from the fuel or if the casks holding the fuel are dropped.

He said that "countermeasures" have been prepared - including back-up wires to hold the loads and mechanisms to hold the fuel in the event of a power failure.

A briefing document released by the site's owners, Tepco, spells out a series of safety systems designed to minimize the dangers.

For example, the fuel pond itself has been strengthened while the new crane can handle loads of one tonne while the fuel cask only weighs 450kg.

Previous Fukushima problems

  • 21 Oct: Radioactive water overflows a containment barrier after heavy rain
  • 7 Oct A plant worker accidentally switches off power to pumps used for cooling damaged reactors
  • 3 Oct Tepco says there is a radioactive water leak after workers overfill a storage tank
  • 21 Aug Japan's nuclear agency upgrades Fukushima alert level
  • 20 Aug Tepco says 300 tonnes of radioactive water has leaked from a storage tank into the ground
  • July Tepco for the first time admits radioactive water is going into the sea
  • June Tepco says radioactive water leaking from a storage tank to the ground
  • April Tepco suspects a fresh radioactive water leak at Fukushima
  • March Tepco suspects a rodent may have been behind a power cut that shut down cooling systems
  • Dec 2011 Contaminated water leaks from a treatment system, caused by a crack in the foundation

Collision tests, it is said, have shown that even if the fuel cask is dropped, it may be deformed but its seals will not be broken.

The fuel rods will then be deposited into a new "common" pool with a cooling system.

According to the METI official, "the common pool is planned to be used over a long period, supposedly for 10 to 20 years, and will be reinforced against possible future earthquakes and tsunamis".

The Tepco document says the rods will be checked for signs of damage - large amounts of debris fell into the pool during the disaster so the risks are real.

It says that checks for corrosion have found only minor signs so far - with "no corrosion affecting fuel integrity".

But only when the operation begins will engineers get a detailed look at the rods and a chance to assess their state.

One senior figure in Japan's nuclear watchdog told me: "Inspections by camera show that the rods look OK but we're not sure if they're damaged - you never know."

He said Unit 4 presented particular dangers because its entire stock of fuel rods was in the pool at the time of the accident.

If the operation goes as planned, attention will then focus on the massive challenges posed by Units 1, 2 and 3.

According to the METI official, the latest investigations have shown that despite the meltdowns experienced by each reactor, their temperatures have now stabilised.

In Units 1 and 2, readings show the presence of water in what's called the primary containment vessel - suggesting that the melted fuel rods have not penetrated that safety barrier.

The radiation level is too high in Unit 3 for that kind of examination to be carried out but using data from the reactor pressure vessel the official assumes that water is also present in the primary containment.

Meanwhile, the site continues to be plagued by leaks of radioactive water flowing into the Pacific Ocean.

Tepco will not confirm the precise timing of the fuel rod operation but after so much public outrage at the company's handling of the crisis so far, scrutiny of this latest episode will be intense.

David Shukman Article written by David Shukman David Shukman Science editor

Healthy dose of hope for one-use syringes

Could a disposable syringe help stem outbreaks of HIV and other transmissible diseases?

Read full article

More on This Story


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 260.

    As the pro nuclear suggest that reactors are safe, we should be building them in the population centres to reduce electricity transmission losses and benefit from the waste heat for district heating.

    Did GE care that it was putting reactors on earthquake zones? Do the Chinese or French care about the suitability of Hinkley Point?


  • rate this

    Comment number 259.

    I always find it odd how supporters.of nuclear power point to the lack of immeadiate obvious deaths. In this instance the outcome will be slow and incideous and largely undramatic, like the seeping of radioactive waste into the ocean. Experts we refer to a lack of clear association and thus dismiss any affects. This is a disaster but they will just deny or dismiss any association.

  • rate this

    Comment number 258.

    Saying no one will die from the Fukushima reactor explosions and cooling pond fires is wishful thinking, each reactor held 100 tonnes of MOX fuel, MOX means its doped with Plutonium 239 at a level of 4%,that means there's 4 tonnes of Plutonium in each core, & having worked with Plutonium I understand how toxic it is, you only need an intake of 3 BQ to reach a years limit, thats 3 counts per second

  • rate this

    Comment number 257.

    @256. rrrobs
    I've never seen anyone attempt to calculate the benefit that Chernobyl has had in two ways. 1 being what the electricity supply did to improve lives in the region before the disaster and after (the plant still worked till very recently) and 2 that without it some would say Russia couldn't be where it is now, Ukraine wouldn't be independent. Don't get caught up counting bodies...

  • rate this

    Comment number 256.

    Some still say that Chernobyl took only 25 lives, when in fact tens of thousands have been diagnosed with cancer, birthdefects, immune disorders, etc.


Comments 5 of 260


Features & Analysis

BBC Future


Space like you've never heard it

Listen to out-of-this-world music


  • 3D model of Christ the Redeemer statueClick Watch

    Using drones to 3D map the famous Brazilian landmark Christ the Redeemer

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.