EU wildlife grants will be used to grow crops

 
Grass The EU's new rules on subsidies oblige farmers to ensure some of their land supports wild plants or animals

Related Stories

Grants designed to protect the countryside have been controversially switched to pay England's farmers to grow beans and peas.

The EU's new rules on subsidies oblige farmers to ensure that some of their land supports wild plants and animals.

But during negotiations, farmers in Europe watered down the policy so planting crops that improve soil may be counted as helping wildlife.

Wildlife campaigners have expressed outrage at the move.

Member states can tighten the EU rule if they want to, but England's farmers persuaded the government this would make them uncompetitive.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) announced that planting peas and beans in so-called Ecological Focus Areas (EFAs) will qualify for full grants.

A spokesman said: "We have included Nitrogen Fixing Crops as an EFA because we want farmers to have as much flexibility as possible so they can focus on growing British food. We are supporting the environment through investing over £3bn in agri-environment schemes over the next CAP, which is more than ever before."

Today's announcement focuses on the "greening" element of the CAP, which will tie 30% of a farmer's subsidy payments to new environmental requirements.

Start Quote

We think including this measure is very positive for the environment”

End Quote Andrew Clark National Farmers Union

The RSPB's Martin Harper said: "The government has squandered this opportunity and is handing out £11bn to the farming industry in England and expecting very, very little in return."

Stephen Trotter, of The Wildlife Trusts, condemned the decision to allow grants to peas and beans: "Nitrogen-fixing crops improve the soil but don't help wildlife at all," he said. "This is bizarre. It gets more outrageous every minute I think about it. It seems that farmers just want public funds with no strings attached."

Andrew Clark of the National Farmers Union (NFU) told BBC News it was vital for the government to apply wildlife protection rules at the same levels as continental neighbours.

"Comparing nitrogen-fixing crops with permanent pasture, obviously the pasture will have greater biodiversity," he said. "But we believe a range of options should be available to farmers. Anyone with broad beans in their garden will see they are full of pollinators at the moment.

"Wildflower meadows tend to have quite a limited flowering season but some legumes are flowering from April to June, and others much later in summer. We think including this measure is very positive for the environment."

The row follows a report last week in which a group of experts warned that the Commission had failed in its attempt to "green" the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) to give value to taxpayers and safeguard the countryside. The report said only strong discretionary policies by member states could protect wildlife.

Mr Trotter said: "I understand the government is not in an easy position - ministers don't want England's farmers to lose out if Europe's farmers are facing watered down rules. But we can't keep going on like this throwing public money in the knowledge that it'll all be reduced to the lowest common denominator."

Households pay roughly £400 a year towards the subsidies.

A Commission source said that encouraging farmers to grow beans would help Europe's food security by increasing the amount of protein, which in turn would help to reduce imports of soya.

Follow Roger on Twitter.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 197.

    As a nation need to start eating what's in season rather than having food all year round.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 85.

    All major farmers like other industries need to be taxed for breached in support to greens. NO FARMER should be subsidised. If they cannot compete they need to go out of business. Farming subsidies like all others support inefficiency see the former steel and coal industry.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 48.

    As a farmer I can assure that the majority of comments on here are factually incorrect.
    The business relies on pollinators and for the countryside to thrive. If a crop fails one year, because the land is starved and not producing that is enough to reduce a farmer to banckrupcy. Farmers have been caretaking the countryside for thousands of years, and have built the countryside you see today.

  • rate this
    +11

    Comment number 37.

    Peas and beans are quite good for pollinating insects so the argument that they help the environment has another string to it... BUT surely there are already subsidies available for commercial crops is it really right and proper to divert this money.

  • rate this
    +46

    Comment number 34.

    I do not understand why farmers need to be paid an extra subsidy to grow peas and beans. There is is a market for these things and they hardly expected to hand over the crops for nothing.

 

Comments 5 of 6

 

More Science & Environment stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

BBC Future

An Indian Hindu devotee a day ahead of the Chhat festival (Getty Images)

Will religion ever disappear?

How belief will change in the future Read more...

Programmes

  • Models of roads and cars on a bridgeThe Travel Show Watch

    A world in miniature - behind the scenes at one of the world’s largest model railways

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.