Do friends have similar genomes?

 
family Is your DNA more similar to that of your friends, or your fourth cousins?

Related Stories

A study from a controversial pair of US researchers claims that we are more genetically similar to our friends than we are to strangers.

Looking at differences between nearly 2,000 people, recruited as part of a heart study in a small US town, they found that friends shared about 0.1% more DNA, on average, than strangers.

While small, this is the same level of similarity expected for fourth cousins.

Other scientists are sceptical about the paper, which was published in PNAS.

"I think that they're unusual findings, and that usually draws criticisms from scientists," said Prof James Fowler, one of the study's authors and a professor of both medical genetics and political science at the University of California, San Diego.

Together with Prof Nicholas Christakis from Yale University, Prof Fowler analysed nearly 500,000 single-letter markers from across the genome, using data from the Framingham Heart Study.

These results were useful because as well as providing DNA samples, participants were asked who their closest friends were. "Because the study started in a small community, many people that were named as friends, also happened to be involved in the study," Prof Fowler explained.

So he and Prof Christakis calculated a "kinship coefficient" using the genetic markers from pairs of friends and strangers, and found that it was slightly higher among friends.

"We're not really making claims about specific candidate genes here," Prof Fowler told BBC News. "We're making claims about structural characteristics across the entire genome."

Start Quote

[This is not] just being driven by people who were accidentally friends with their fourth cousins and didn't tell us”

End Quote Prof James Fowler University of California, San Diego
Disputed conclusions

Other researchers have expressed concern about different factors that could affect the results - such as ethnicity or other types of "population stratification" - which could make people both genetically similar and more likely to be friends.

Prof Evan Charney from Duke University, who has criticised earlier research by Fowler and Christakis, said this type of analysis only works if none of the subjects are related to each other at all, which is difficult to confirm.

"These studies depend upon that assumption - that you're looking at thousands of people who are not related," he told the BBC.

The authors, however, tried to allow for any stratification or family relationships within their population, in a smaller comparison of 907 pairs of friends, this time including nearly 1.5 million genetic markers.

"We excluded any one of them that had any relatedness whatsoever," explained Prof Fowler. "We didn't want anyone to think that this was just being driven by people who were accidentally friends with their fourth cousins and didn't tell us."

DNA The study compared one-letter differences known as "single nucleotide polymorphisms"

Dr Rory Bowden, a statistician and lecturer at the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics in Oxford, also expressed reservations about whether the study could be confounded by "very subtle genetic population structure".

"I wonder whether [these methods can fully account for] factors known to drive friendships, like church membership, sports or other cultural affinities, that would also lead to a correlation with genotype," he said, "because they reflect differences in places of origin within Europe of the Framingham participants."

Prof Charney further points out that studies like this can over-emphasise the importance of our DNA sequence itself. "People do not have the same genome in all the cells and tissues of their body," he said.

With some exceptions, like the mutations that cause rare genetic diseases, Prof Charney argues that even in great numbers, the single-letter genetic markers used in studies like this one have not proved very informative about human traits and behaviour.

But the study's authors remain confident. "Most people don't even know who their fourth cousins are!" said Prof Christakis. "Yet we are somehow, among a myriad of possibilities, managing to select as friends the people who resemble our kin."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 78.

    As this study was conducted in a small town, people would be more likely to be friends with the local (genetically similar) population rather than outsiders.

    A study conducted in a large city (with a large gene-pool) would almost certainly give a different result.

    This research says very little about friendship, but does point out the obvious inevitability of in-breeding in small towns.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 55.

    We choose our friends through personality, trustworthiness, openness, honesty, integrity and whether they have similar interests to us. There may even be an element of attraction to each other. Whether this is down to genomes or not is open to question. You may even be friends with someone who is the exact opposite of you. How do you explain that?

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 36.

    I really do hope not, my best friend is Max my Labrador.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 27.

    Interesting, but is this simply gene expression leading to our own personal traits and then a wish to find acceptance of those traits by finding others who look, act or think in a similar way. Standing out from the crowd leads to vulnerability, standing out as a nation leads to political friction. Human kind seeks critical mass acceptance on both a singular and mass population basis, its survival

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 11.

    I'd like to see the study replicated and know if it fully accounts for related people being affiliated to similar social and cultural groups and hence meeting, as Prof Charney notes in the article. On the other hand, psychological studies show that people are subliminally attracted to the familiar and to the similar so the result might reflect that.

 

Comments 5 of 7

 

More Science & Environment stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

  • Abdi Nor IftinGolden ticket

    How a refugee entered a lottery and won a new life in the US


  • Herring in a fur coatMerry herring

    How fish 'in a fur coat' is enough to make Russia's New Year happy


  • Curiosity Self-Portrait at 'Windjana' Drilling SiteIn pictures

    The most stunning space photos of the year


  • Amy Adams, Cate Blanchett, Sandra Bullock and Dame Judi DenchFilm quiz of 2014

    How much do you remember about the past 12 months?


BBC Future

An Indian Hindu devotee a day ahead of the Chhat festival (Getty Images)

Will religion ever disappear?

How belief will change in the future Read more...

Programmes

  • Tom BrookTalking Movies Watch

    Tom Brook looks back at some of the best movies of 2014 from around the world

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.