We don't talk any more - is technology harming communication?

 
Man texting, woman on mobile Is talking face to face being undermined by technology?

In a world of tweets and texts, email and instant messaging, are we communicating any better?

Or is modern technology making us lazy about actually talking to each other, with damaging effects on both business and society?

This was the issue that the Today programme guest editor Sir Victor Blank asked me to investigate. Having only had a brief email explaining what he wanted, I was still rather unclear about his thesis - until I got him on the phone for a chat. Which sort of made his point...

"Technology is a massive aid to communication," he told me, "but if it takes away regular face-to-face or direct conversations, then you lose something of the softer edges."

Sir Victor, the former chairman of Lloyds TSB, seemed particularly concerned about the impact that modern methods were having in the business world, with executives firing off emails in anger, and making deals they might later regret, rather than seeing the whites of the eyes of their counterparts in face-to-face negotiations.

That was a concern shared by one person Sir Victor suggested as a possible interviewee. The former Times editor Lord Rees-Mogg told me that if he were in the newspaper business today he would of course use the most modern methods. But he felt that many people could become addicted to email and social networking. "I do notice that emails are often fired off without any real consideration - they're also much ruder than more considered communications, so I think they're inferior."

Former editor of the Times Lord Rees-Mogg: Emails are much ruder than more considered communications

Perhaps surprisingly, that view might get a sympathetic hearing at the technology firm Atos, which has decided to phase out email as an internal communications tool. "Email has become the easy way to communicate but also the lazy way," says Rob Price, the UK managing partner of Atos.

Anyone who has arrived at their desk to find that they have been copied in on dozens of internal emails of no relevance, will say amen to that. But Atos is not rejecting modern communication techniques, simply recognising that a new generation already thinks email is old hat. Its new recruits arrive from university accustomed to instant messaging and social networks - far more rapid methods of communication.

Another major corporation has recognised that forcing its employees to be "always on" has its limits. Volkswagen's Works Council has decreed that the German firm's Blackberry server should stop sending emails to employees thirty minutes after their shift ends.

But what I really needed was someone who had taken an objective, scientific look at the way we use communications technology - and Dr Monica Bulger of the Oxford Internet Institute fitted the bill.

Far from dumbing down the way we communicate, technology had made us smarter, she told me. In particular, executives like Sir Victor Blank had been made more literate by the arrival of computers and word processing. "Prior to word processors, executives would dictate messages to secretaries and speak on the phone. So the use of technology has improved literacy."

Dr Bulger conceded that face-to-face communication was important, but said it also had its dangers: "I've sat in meetings where people have said things they shouldn't have." Whereas email gave more time for considered reflection: "You can do the count to ten rule and think a bit before you respond."

Overall, the academic's conclusion was that the different technologies now available to us were helping not hindering communication. But she conceded that there was an issue with what she described as "cognitive overload or data deluge."

Tell me about it. As someone who is addicted to these technologies, I still find myself oppressed by the sheer quantity of emails, phone messages and social media activity that need to be dealt with each day. I can't imagine how I would do my job without tools like Twitter. Yet I sometimes wonder whether I communicated better 30 years ago.

In my student days, before the age of the mobile or email, we used to simply drop in on people or bump into them in the street - but still managed to have rich and varied social lives and make enduring friendships.

So I decided to go back to university to give the final word to members of today's Facebook generation. I knocked on the door of my son's student flat in Oxford and asked him to go and get some friends from next door - he immediately reached for his phone to text them, rather than walk a few steps.

But once we'd gathered them together, the students proved to have quite a nuanced view of modern communication. One of them hardly ever used social networks and said he just bumped into people in the street; another mentioned the danger of becoming obsessed with Facebook at the expense of face-to-face communication.

And a third summed it up for me: "You use social networking and modern technology to arrange meeting people face to face, when otherwise you might not see them for a few weeks - you might not bump into them." We agreed that new communication technologies provided an addition, not a replacement, for traditional means.

So what shall I tell Sir Victor? It seems to me that his concerns about the impact of email, social networking and instant messaging on our ability to communicate, are somewhat exaggerated. But maybe we need to meet face to face to talk it through...

 
Rory Cellan-Jones Article written by Rory Cellan-Jones Rory Cellan-Jones Technology correspondent

Who has won the social referendum?

Millions on both sides of the Scottish referendum have taken to tweeting and Facebooking their views on the issues - who has come out on top in the social media battle?

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Rory

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 17.

    anotherfakename wrote:

    "Of the smart phones activated at Christmas more were Android than Apple"

    Not a single Android phone, though, even comes close to the iphone's sales. The same with the iPad.

    "the Nokia N8 has a12 mpix compared to the iphones 8mpix"

    An 8mp can easily be better than a 12mp.

    "as a camera and as a phone Nokia is lots better."

    Hence Nokia's bleak position in the market?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 16.

    re Dr Bulger "..the use of technology has improved literacy." that is not borne out by daily observation, to wit, the BBC's own decline in standards (both spelling & grammar).

    re "..is technology harming communication?" the inappropriate use of technologies (as in for the benefit of specific groups) has harmed the fabric of society, the declining ability to communicate is but one indicator.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 15.

    Apple bias? What are you people taking? There's no mention of Apple or its products in this article (Twitter, FB and Blackberry are the only tech companies mentioned), and it's impossible to tell what phones the people in the picture are using. Even if they were using iPhones, the BBC is not responsible for what phones members of the public happen to be using. The only "Apple bias" is yours.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 14.

    Notice the continuing apple bias - although not the most popular smartphone its the one in the pictures, apple are also the providers of the tablets the chimps are using in another prominant story. I wonder if the BBC realise that other tech stuff goes on or whether they think tech begins and ends with apple?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 13.

    No it isn't. It's people's lack of communication skills that harms communication, not the tech they use. One suspects that someone who is rude by email would be only slightly less rude face-to-face, perhaps for fear of a punch on the nose, but the sentiments and lack of skills remain.

    Perhaps if we went back to teaching manners and etiquette, and the difference between formal and casual...?

 

Comments 5 of 17

 

Features & Analysis

  • Toronto Mayor Rob FordFord nation

    Toronto mayor's enemies unite with him in new battle


  • Tattooed person using tabletRogue ink

    People who lost their jobs because of their tattoos


  • An ant and a humanAnts v humans

    Do all the world's ants really weigh as much as all the humans?


  • Two sphinxes guarding the entrance to the tombTomb mystery

    Secrets of ancient burial site keep Greeks guessing


BBC Future

(Getty Images)

Secrets of the aircraft boneyards

The vast storage sites for surplus planes Read more...

Programmes

  • TokyoThe Travel Show Watch

    Japan has a reputation for being expensive but can you visit without breaking the bank?

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.