Windows boss shown the door

Steven Sinofsky

The technology world is abuzz today with news of the abrupt departure of a key executive at Microsoft. Steve Sinofsky is probably the second most important figure at the company after the chief executive Steve Ballmer. Now he is leaving with immediate effect.

His exit, just weeks after the launch of Windows 8, raises questions about the future direction of the business, not least because he was seen as a credible successor to Ballmer. A 23 year veteran of the company, he was a familiar figure to anyone who attended a Microsoft launch, a polished performer explaining just why we should be excited about the latest innovations in the Windows operating system.

The Windows 8 launch has been seen by the company as a great success, moving Microsoft into the new touchscreen mobile era, with Steve Ballmer celebrating the sales of four million copies in just three days. True, there have been some complaints from those who see the new operating system as an uneasy mix of the new mobile world and the old desktop environment, but Microsoft seems confident that all is going to plan.

So why has the man who has been central to the launch gone? Microsoft's statement revealing the news has done nothing to dampen the rumours of a bust-up at the top. Although it features a quote from Steve Ballmer expressing gratitude for Sinofsky's years of work and another from the man himself talking of the professionalism and generosity of everyone at "this awesome company", there is no explanation of why he is leaving.

That quote from the Windows president is also in an email he has written to Microsoft staff in which he says he is leaving to pursue new opportunities. He says that this is an ideal moment for him to move on, having launched Windows 8, and is keen to dispel any conspiracy theories: "This was a personal and private choice that in no way reflects any speculation or theories one might read - about me, opportunity, the company or its leadership."

So if it is as simple as that he wants to go off and do something else, why did Microsoft not make that clear in its press release? I put that to the company and got no real response.

Then I looked at a CNET profile of Steven Sinofsky. The article, which appears well sourced, talks of a brilliant but divisive figure, feuding with fellow executives and creating "a toxic work environment that has chased talented employees away from a maturing company that's in desperate need of innovative thinking."

So perhaps Steve Ballmer was rather relieved when Mr Sinofsky talked of seeking out new opportunities. In any case, it is inevitable that there will be speculation because Mr Sinofsky's departure comes at a time of upheaval in some other big technology firms.

The most obvious example is Apple, which last month got rid of Scott Forstall, boss of its iOS software division, and John Browett, who very briefly ran the retail operation. Both were apparently axed because of serious failings - notably in Forstall's case the disastrous Apple Maps launch which resulted in the millions who upgraded to iOS 6 getting a much worse product than they'd had before.

What all of these giant companies are trying to do is foster a continued spirit of innovation and risk-taking in a fast-moving environment where any mistake can leave a business floundering to catch up. When I interviewed Steve Ballmer last month, my repeated suggestions that Microsoft had struggled to innovate in recent years were met with some impatience.

But it seems likely that he decided that the completion of Windows 8 was a good time to review how the company was working. Now another company veteran, Julie Larson-Green, has been given the task of heading up Microsoft's most important division, running all of Windows software and hardware engineering.

In my experience, Microsoft still employs some of the brightest and most capable people in the technology industry. But combining their efforts to produce a fast moving business turning out innovative products remains a challenge.

Rory Cellan-Jones Article written by Rory Cellan-Jones Rory Cellan-Jones Technology correspondent

Zuckerberg - the unasked questions

Mark Zuckerberg's appearance at the Mobile World Congress was a missed opportunity.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Rory


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 54.

    53.T Realist

    So you are happy to dig into the control panel & then Java to remove old versions are you & if you don't you are open to a number of attacks! etc.

    I edit video, sound and write music and use dozens of applications and files. I run several bespoke services & databases too & have encrypted disks & I code in several languages and long from text in several languages.

    Win 8 is a pain!

  • rate this

    Comment number 53.

    I find Win 8 Pro to be good for my needs as a gamer, surfer, video editor and tinkerer. The Metro Start screen has all the shortcuts I will need now that I have cleaned it to my needs. The hate is mostly unjustified, the Metro screen is my Start button but without the crap I never needed.

  • rate this

    Comment number 52.

    @51 John_from_Hendon

    Another method John, and others, is to use the links tool bar along the top and paste in links to your favourite apps. If you know how you can write a couple of batch files and have a shut-down or log-out option too. But that only solves a few of its many issues.

  • rate this

    Comment number 51.

    To those who hate Win 8


    Download one of the many 'XP like start button' replacements available for Win 7 to give you a quasi start button on the left hand corner of the screen. Just hit the desktop thing and forget the rubbish interface.

    This overcomes the lack of support for XP coming to your PC soon!

    Or switch to Linux... (say Kubuntu which I find OK)

  • rate this

    Comment number 50.

    Windows 8 is Vista 2 - or that is the impression I get.
    Win 7 is ok but not as stable or reliable as XP.

    Products like Win Media Player have gone heavily downhill over the last few years, with features and flaws that look very like the work of sloppy, incompetant, or amateur programmers..


Comments 5 of 54


Features & Analysis

BBC Future

(Science Photo Library)

Nasa’s amazing airport simulator

How to train 21st Century controllers


  • A robotClick Watch

    The latest in robotics including software that can design electronics to solve problems

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.