US school tag tracker project prompts court row

 
Screengrab of NISD webpage

Related Stories

A court challenge has delayed plans to expel a Texan student for refusing to wear a radio tag that tracked her movements.

Religious reasons led Andrea Hernandez to stop wearing the tag that revealed where she was on her school campus.

The tags were introduced to track students and help tighten control of school funding.

A Texan court has granted a restraining order filed by a civil rights group pending a hearing on use of the tags.

ID badges containing radio tags started to be introduced at the start of the 2012 school year to schools run by San Antonio's Northside Independent School District (NISD). The tracking tags gave NISD a better idea of the numbers of students attending classes each day - the daily average of which dictates how much cash it gets from state coffers.

'Mark of the beast'

Introducing the tags led to protests by some school students at John Jay High School - one of two schools out of 112 in the NISD catchment area piloting the tags.

Ms Hernandez refused to wear the tag because it conflicted with her religious beliefs, according to court papers. Wearing such a barcoded tag can be seen as a mark of the beast as described in Revelation 13 in the Bible, Ms Hernandez's father told Wired magazine in an interview.

NISD suspended Ms Hernandez and said she would no longer be able to attend the John Jay High School unless she wore the ID badge bearing the radio tag. Alternatively it said Ms Hernandez could attend other schools in the district that had not yet joined the radio tagging project.

The Rutherford Institute, a liberties campaign group, joined the protests and went to court to get a restraining order to stop NISD suspending Ms Hernandez.

RFID chip Ms Hernandez refused to wear a name tag containing an RFID (radio-frequency identification) chip

A district court judge has granted the restraining order so Ms Hernandez can go back to school and ordered a hearing next week on the NISD radio tag project.

The Rutherford Institute said the NISD's suspension violated Texan laws on religious freedom as well as free speech amendments to the US constitution.

"The court's willingness to grant a temporary restraining order is a good first step, but there is still a long way to go - not just in this case, but dealing with the mindset, in general, that everyone needs to be monitored and controlled," said John Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute in a statement.

Mr Whitehead said student tagging and locating projects were the first step in producing a "compliant citizenry".

"These 'student locator' programmes are ultimately aimed at getting students used to living in a total surveillance state where there will be no privacy, and wherever you go and whatever you text or email will be watched by the government," he said.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +47

    Comment number 164.

    Whatever benefit that can be derived from tagging students in this manner is more than offset by the great potential for abuse and misuse of the tracking system. The mere fact that the vast majority of students and parents choose to accept to be monitored in this way shows the power of the herd mentality. Kudos to this lone student who dares to challenge authority on a significant issue.

  • rate this
    +26

    Comment number 160.

    The breach in privacy for this little stunt is shocking. Simple swipe cards to monitor attendance would be more than adequate, and save the teacher time doing roll call. Tracking their every movement should be a crime , the schools have no business with that.
    And the hackers are already stealing our tax records and credit cards, you know they're going to abuse this.

  • rate this
    +31

    Comment number 141.

    When I was at school they had very simple way or monitoring student attendance; the teacher marked you're attendance card at the start of each lesson and you handed it in to your year office at the end of the week.

    If you didn't get 90% attendance per term you got a meeting with the welfare office.

    That system worked very well and nobody complained about it.

  • rate this
    +17

    Comment number 55.

    I pure terms I don't have an issue with it, but that really should be a last resort.

    Surely it is an epic fail if the school cannot keep track of students in more traditional ways. I suggest, the problem is with the management, not the (all) students.

  • rate this
    -42

    Comment number 28.

    The pupils are supposed to be in school and the school has a legal responsibility to know where they are in the school. I guess they could have an armed guard on each door, as they do already with many of the doors. How many people who work or have worked did so without an ID card? What the heck is the real fuss rather than the lets all moan issue?

 

Comments 5 of 7

 

More Technology stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

BBC Future

(Thinkstock)

Why autopilots are dangerous

The increased risk of computer control Read more...

Programmes

  • Three men solving a puzzleThe Travel Show Watch

    Why tourists are heading to Budapest for the chance to break out of a room

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.