Government demands action on web safety

 
Internet mouse

Google, BT and a clutch of other web giants and internet service providers have been put on notice - the government wants action on sorting out the problem of harmful content on the internet.

The Culture Secretary Maria Miller has summoned them to a meeting on 17 June where they will be expected to come up with plans to do more to stop access to material such as child abuse images or material designed to promote terrorism.

In her letter to the companies, the culture secretary says there is widespread public concern:

"Whether these concerns focus on access to illegal pornographic content, the proliferation of extremist material which might incite racial or religious hatred, or the ongoing battle against online copyright theft, a common question emerges: what more can be done to prevent offensive online content potentially causing harm?"

In a briefing to journalists, the language is even blunter.

"Woolwich is the latest catalyst," an aide to Ms Miller says. "Enough is enough - concentrated effort is now needed by the whole industry."

What this effort is expected to achieve in terms of concrete action by the companies is a lot less clear. They may point out that a whole lot of different concerns, from child safety to copyright infringement, are being lumped together.

In the case of child abuse images (not "child porn" as some government officials still erroneously describe it) the law is already clear - they are illegal. The Internet Watch Foundation maintains a blacklist of such images, updated twice a day, and its members agree to block them - though there will be pressure on the industry to do more to fund the IWF's work and be more proactive in hunting down offending sites.

But when it comes to other material that may be considered harmful but is not yet illegal, the internet industry may struggle to respond to Ms Miller's demands for action. The companies will ask who is to decide exactly what is harmful and should be prevented from "potentially causing harm", and they will not be keen to be cast in the role of internet censor.

The Department of Culture Media and Sport (DCMS) is suggesting various ideas to be discussed at the summit. They include "a set of industry-wide protocols around how they respond to concerns around content when they arise, a look at the extent to which filters can be used, looking further at the public wi-fi proposals beyond the pornography focus". It is also pointing to the code of practice agreed by the mobile broadband companies which restricts access to certain content on mobile phones and asking why the likes of Google, Yahoo and Microsoft can't come up with something similar.

The government is stressing that it isn't going into the summit with a list of demands, but, in the words of one official: "We're saying this is a serious issue, there's a lot of concern and we want you all to think about what you can do."

The companies invited to the summit are keeping their heads down for now. But I imagine conference rooms at Google, BT and Microsoft will be booked out for the next fortnight as worried executives try to come up with simple solutions to make the internet a safer place.

Update: 12:56 BST

A number of web liberty campaigners, including the Open Rights Group and Index on Censorship, have written to Maria Miller expressing their concerns about her planned summit.

They warn that "an understandable desire to ensure a 'safer' environment online can easily lead to overreaching or unaccountable powers or practices".

Jim Killock, of the Open Rights Group, said the government should be talking about concerted international action against criminals posting illegal content, rather than attempting to blame internet companies.

 
Rory Cellan-Jones Article written by Rory Cellan-Jones Rory Cellan-Jones Technology correspondent

Can internet companies monitor terrorists?

Big tech firms, and in particular Facebook, are under pressure to become more active in the battle against terrorism. But what are their current arrangements?

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Rory

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 310.

    Great. Goverment want firms to control content, but still reserve the right to Spy on users!
    Typical. Anyone really believe in Freedom in UK any more??

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 309.

    People who think ISPs can wave their magic wand and make bad stuff on the internet disappear have got their heads in the clouds.

    There are always ways around content filtering such as proxies, and encrypted SSL enabled private web servers. The only real way to deal with this problem is to educate children at an early age about internet porn and all things bad on the internet.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 308.

    takes less than 5 mins to get around blocks just use a proxy server its how people get around blocks on torrent sites and anyway i pay for internet access i dont need some minister in her ivory tower telling me what i can and cant see if if its legal then its down to me to censor myself not someone else this is just another way for the goverment big brother to snoop on people

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 307.

    Even if there were blocks in place how successful are they likely to be. Sure they'll inconvenience a number of people but the ones they want to block will be around the blokes in a matter of minutes. When working in China it took me around 5 minutes to circumvent the great firewall so I cold read the BBC news site.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 306.

    Websites can already be blocked quite easily (internet traffic goes through a few main hubs, which can be set to quietly filter out content), and you don't need a law for that. So, why the political theater? This "debate" on the Internet is beginning to resemble the Tyndale/More debate over whether the truth lay with the word or the Church hierarchy: thankfully, then, the word won out - and now?

 

Comments 5 of 310

 

Features & Analysis

BBC Future

Manmade islands require redrawn maps (Getty Images)

The last unmapped places

Uncharted regions closer than you think Read more...

Programmes

  • A model with a projection mapped onto her faceClick Watch

    Face hacking - how to use a computer to turn your face into a work of digital art

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.