Web privacy - outsourced to the US and China?

 
A person uses a Chromebook Pixel The latest claims will put internet privacy back in the spotlight

Overnight, the Guardian and the Washington Post have made startling claims about the extent of the US government's surveillance of web communications.

They allege that under a programme called PRISM the intelligence agencies have direct access to the servers of the biggest web firms, including Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Yahoo, Skype and Apple.

Now it must be said that all of the firms have denied any knowledge of this programme, insisting they only hand over data when they receive a subpoena relating to named individuals, rather than offering blanket access.

Facebook, for instance, says it does not provide access to any government organisations, and any requests for information from law-enforcement bodies are dealt with on an individual basis in accordance with the law.

But, unlike yesterday's story about the blanket surveillance of American Verizon customers, these latest revelations will raise concerns outside the US. James Clapper, the US intelligence chief, has sought to reassure the public by saying the web-monitoring operation only targets "non-US persons".

Start Quote

We might loathe the idea, but we probably expect our security services to be eavesdropping and trampling on our civil liberties”

End Quote

Not much to worry about then, unless you happen to be a citizen of any other country. And then it only matters if you happen to use the services of Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, AOL, Skype, YouTube or Apple. Which means just about everyone who has an online presence.

What this highlights is the way we now entrust our data and our privacy almost entirely to American companies, storing it in their "clouds" - vast data centres located in the US. (Skype, which was founded in Europe, is now owned by Microsoft).

They may be rigorous in their control of that data and our privacy rights - or they may feel obliged to cooperate with their government's demands for greater access. It is hard to know the truth.

And it is not only the US which now plays a crucial role in overseeing our communications activities. Yesterday, Britain's Intelligence and Security Committee raised concerns about the key role China's Huawei plays in our telecoms infrastructure.

So our data is with the Americans, while the Chinese control the equipment used to connect our mobile phone calls and broadband.

Now you may or may not be happy about that. I'm of the view that life is too short to worry about whether the FBI is reading my emails, or scanning my Facebook updates, or China's Red Army is listening to my phone calls.

But most people will agree that the privacy and security of our data should be a matter of personal choice, over which we have at least a degree of control. Now it seems that we have outsourced that control to the US and China and unless you want to withdraw from the digital world there is very little you can do about it.

 
Rory Cellan-Jones, Technology correspondent Article written by Rory Cellan-Jones Rory Cellan-Jones Technology correspondent

A computing revolution in schools

There will be a whole new way of teaching children about computing, but how much do teachers and parents know about it?

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Rory

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 60.

    Richard Stallman was right all along about "cloud computing"!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 59.

    Ask yourself what is going on whilst we are led to keep ourselves worrying about this non story?

    Building up for yet another war in the middle east perhaps?

    Parliament recess starts in a a little over a month.
    Not that it matters.
    We have such a supine press and in any case the people are powerless.

    As they will shortly find out in Turkey.
    Truly the shape of things to come.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 58.

    I wouldn't mind our Govts collecting this infomation if they were more competant - how often have the UK/US Govt.s made a hash of their "intelligence", usually through stupidity rather than malice aforethrough...

    ...as the White House has long since admitted OVER 80% of those taken to Guantanemo were completely innocent, mostly just mistaken indentity...

    ...human beings make mistakes...

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 57.

    12. RMW
    "I'm of the view that life is too short to worry.."
    ---
    It is an interesting journalistic mindset & precedent.

    Can't help but feel that such a sanguine reaction would be absent if the people involved were on the BBC's naughty vs. nice list.

    Indeed the attitude to Government/GCHQ activities here seems noticeably different to Obama Admin/NSA over the pond.

    For some reason.

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 56.

    Im reading this article and replying from a laptop connected to "The Clouds" free wifi in my local swimming baths... my 2pence worth is simple... these news articles (like most) are designed for one purpose, to be controversial, to gain more user views and ultimately more money for the company which posted it.... chances are your going to browse elsewhere on the site.... never mind the story...

 

Comments 5 of 60

 

Features & Analysis

BBC Future

(Google)

Inside Google’s secret drone lab

The computing giant’s future fliers Read more...

Programmes

  • Art installationClick Watch

    How one artist is using computer code to turn internet radio into a unique piece of music

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.