Thousands make #nomakeupselfie donation error

 
Polar bear Many people accidentally enquired about adopting a polar bear

Related Stories

Thousands of pounds donated as part of the "#nomakeupselfie" craze were sent to Unicef instead of Cancer Research UK by mistake, the BBC has learned.

More than £8m has been raised after the craze of taking a self-portrait with no make-up spread virally.

But those texting "DONATE" rather than "BEAT" found their money sent to the wrong charity.

Others accidentally inquired about adopting a polar bear from the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).

UN agency Unicef told the BBC that so far £18,625 has been identified as being accidentally pledged.

It said it was now working with Cancer Research UK to transfer the funds donated so they can be used as intended.

Mike Flynn, director of individual giving at Unicef UK, said it was a "genuine mix-up".

"Unicef believes this error has occurred due to those interested in donating to the #nomakeupselfie campaign sharing the text keyword 'DONATE' - rather than the keyword 'BEAT' - and the text number 70099, which has then been repeated across social media.

"'DONATE to 70099' is an SMS keyword and shortcode combination that Unicef have sole use of, specifically for any members of the public who contact us and wish to donate to us via SMS."

Kelly Rose Bradford no make up seflie The origin of the #nomakeupselfie trend is unclear

He added: "Unicef is not responsible for this error. However, we've been working hard to find a resolution to the situation for those affected.

"We contacted Cancer Research [UK] as soon as we became aware of what was happening. Unicef and Cancer Research [UK] have agreed that these donations will be received in full by Cancer Research [UK].

"We are now working closely with all parties involved to ensure that this doesn't happen again in the future."

Adopting polar bears

The #nomakeupselfie craze has taken social media by storm since flourishing last week. Its origins are unclear, but since going viral the trend has raised more than £8m for Cancer Research UK and other cancer charities.

But it has not been without mishaps for some well-meaning selfie takers.

As well as the Unicef mix-up, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) acknowledged that it too had accidentally received text messages due to the wrong keyword.

Some people's smartphones had autocorrected the word "BEAT" to instead read "BEAR".

"Thank you for choosing an adorable polar bear," the reply from the WWF said. "We will call you today to set up your adoption."

The autocorrect blunder surprised many who took to Twitter to joke about their adoption news.

"Just told Jamie to text 70007 for cancer and he accidentally sent bear," wrote Twitter user @ChrisKirk07. "Now he's got two polar bears."

The WWF said no money was taken from people who had sent the texts.

"Any texts sent to us instead of Cancer Research [UK] would not result in any donations going to help protect polar bears as WWF relies on human operators calling people back to confirm adoptions, so no money would have changed hands," said Kerry Blackstock, WWF's director of fundraising.

"When we realised there was a lot of interest in a campaign we weren't presently running we made sure our automatic text message response let the sender know their text had gone awry.

"We wish Cancer Research UK every success in their campaign and their goals. Polar bear selfies are harder to come by, though, as far as we are aware, none wear make up."

Follow Dave Lee on Twitter @DaveLeeBBC

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 137.

    The "bear blunder" amused me so much that I went onto the WWF website and really did sign up to sponsor a polar bear. So I would guess they haven't done too badly out of this.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 136.

    As well as the money raised from these selfies, I know of two women who have checked themselves for the first time ever. So, it is also raising awareness. I just hope that once it's all calmed down in a few weeks that folk will continue to check themselves and to donate.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 115.

    Why has no-one mentioned that this £8M was pretty much raised (or at least started and fuelled) by young people? I am proud of our younger generation when they do things like this, despite the oldies moaning about it

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 100.

    For all of those who say this is simply an excuse for narcissism... Sadly narcissists don't need an excuse to post a 'selfie' on FB. Until nominated to post a no make up selfie, I had never before posted a selfie on FB. This is just a bit of fun with a great outcome and, although I donate to charity regularly, it probably wouldn't have crossed my mind to make a random £3 donation last week.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 84.

    It's great that so much money has been raised but it's a shame that the costs of the administration of this will presumably have to be absorbed by UNICEF? Perhaps this example will help those who are critical of charity spending on Admin understand that not only is there often a cost in raising money but, in this case, handing it over to another charity!

 

Comments 5 of 11

 

More Technology stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

  • Prostitute in red light district in Seoul, South KoreaSex for soldiers

    How Korea helped prostitutes work near US military bases


  • LuckyDumped

    The rubbish collector left on the scrap heap as his city cleans up


  • A woman gets a Thanksgiving meal at a church in FergusonFamily fears

    Three generations in Ferguson share Thanksgiving reflections


  • Canada joins TwitterTweet North

    Canada's self-deprecating social media feed


BBC Future

(Allseas)

How to build an ocean giant

The world’s largest ship, in pictures Read more...

Programmes

  • All-inclusive holidaysThe Travel Show Watch

    With all-inclusive holidays seeing a resurgence are local trades missing out to big resorts?

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.