Labour loses fuel rise delay vote


The result was announced to MPs - Labour was defeated by 282 votes to 234

Related Stories

Labour's bid to delay an increase in fuel duty of 3p a litre planned for January has been defeated in the Commons by a government majority of 48.

Labour, which wanted to delay it until at least April saying "it would be wrong" for it to take effect sooner, was defeated by 282 votes to 234.

The party argued the 3p rise would stretch already hard-pressed families.

The Treasury said fuel was "now 10 pence a litre lower than under the previous government's plans".

Consumer organisation Which? said 85% of people it surveyed had expressed concerns about rising fuel prices.

Pollsters Populus interviewed 2,100 UK adults on behalf of Which? online between October 26 and 28.


The survey suggested 39% of people would cut back on motoring costs, while one in 10 said they had used savings to cover motoring costs.

Which? also said the figures showed 8.7 million households curbed their spending on essentials last month, while 6.4 million households used savings to cover outgoings.

The organisation's executive director Richard Lloyd said: "Rising fuel prices are the number one consumer worry and people are already telling us they're having to cut back and dip into savings just to get by.

"On the back of inflation-busting energy bill rises and increasing food prices, consumers can little afford another hit on their household budget. We're calling on the government to think again about their plans to increase fuel duty in January.

"The forthcoming Autumn Statement must focus on measures that will help put money back in the pockets of consumers, because the economic recovery is at risk if we don't increase consumer confidence."

Labour had said the rise would be wrong at a time when the economic recovery was still fragile.

"To boost our flatlining economy Labour has already called for a temporary VAT cut which would take 3p off a litre of fuel," shadow chief secretary to the Treasury Rachel Reeves said.

"But if ministers won't do this the very least they could do is axe January's fuel duty rise at least until April."

'Listening mode'

Labour had urged MPs from other parties - including Conservatives - to vote with it and ignore what it claims are "nods and winks" from the Treasury that a further delay may be in the offing.

Start Quote

The government recognises that the rising price of petrol is a significant part of households' day-to-day spending”

End Quote Treasury spokesman

But Conservative MP Robert Halfon, who has led the campaign against increasing fuel duty, said he would not vote with Labour until he had seen what Mr Osborne would do in next month's Autumn Statement - when he will update MPs about the state of the economy.

"The cost of fuel is the number one issue. That's why I am campaigning on it," he said. "I have had discussions with various people and it is my view that the government is in strong listening mode.

"If I didn't believe that I would make a point and go in to the lobby with Labour."

Had Labour won Monday's vote it would not have been be binding on ministers but a defeat would have embarrassing the government.

The duty increase was originally to be introduced last August, but in June Mr Osborne announced that he was postponing it for five months, saying it was being funded by what he called "larger-than-forecast savings in departmental budgets".

A Treasury spokesman added: "Since coming to office the government has listened to the concerns of motorists about high pump prices and acted."


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 590.

    People will never change their habits and switch to produce less carbon emissions unless they are forced to do it.
    Nothing comes for free including low-carbonate economy. If someone thinks that without making people miserable one can achieve it, he is deluding himself.
    One needs to decide and be honest - you either support higher fuel duty or shut up about environment.

  • rate this

    Comment number 551.

    Thankfully I own a scooter which is far cheaper than a car but I was forced onto this form of transport because of increasing train fares - how long before I am forced onto the bus? (half the cost but twice the journey time)

  • rate this

    Comment number 550.

    Alternatively to a 3p tax on petrol which will hit some of the most poorly-paid workers in the country, the Government could reverse the 5p cut to the top rate of income tax. Wouldn't that raise as much money?

  • rate this

    Comment number 361.

    This govt just doesn't get it, people are already suffering and we a aware of £10B more in cuts to come. This should not even have got to a Commons vote, Osborne knew days ago that he was to receive a £35B windfall from interests payments made under QE which would have more than offset any increase in fuel duty. Indeed these monies could also fund a reduction in VAT to kickstart the economy!

  • rate this

    Comment number 71.

    This 3p increase is morally wrong when billions are being avoided in tax by wealthy people and Businesses.

    Closing tax avoidance loop-holes is where extra tax revenue should come from, not taxing further still the vast majority who are struggling to meet bills.

    This is one example of us low to middle paid people being held down while the rich are still avoiding tax enhancing their lives.


Comments 5 of 10


More UK Politics stories


Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • Audi R8Best in show

    BBC Autos takes a look at 10 of the most eye-catching new cars at the 2015 Geneva motor show


  • Kinetic sculpture violinClick Watch

    The "kinetic sculpture" that can replicate digital files and play them on a violin

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.