George Entwistle pay-off cavalier use of public money - MPs

George Entwistle George Entwistle received more than double the pay-off specified in his contract

The pay-off to former BBC director general George Entwistle - who quit in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal - was a "cavalier" use of money, MPs say.

The £450,000 paid to Mr Entwistle after just 54 days in the job was out of line with public expectation, the Commons Public Accounts Committee said.

The BBC Trust said legal advice has been sought about reclaiming money, but added this was unlikely to happen.

The BBC's head of news said criticism was being taken "very seriously".

On Wednesday, two reviews criticised the corporation for its handling of the Savile scandal and another child abuse story.

One report, the Pollard Review, found there was "chaos and confusion" at the corporation over a Newsnight report which was dropped in December 2011 - but concluded senior managers had not instigated a cover-up.

The review dismissed claims the six-week Newsnight investigation was shelved to protect tribute programmes to the TV presenter and DJ, who died in October 2011, aged 84.

'Rewarded for failure'

Mr Entwistle left last month with a pay-off worth £450,000 - double the amount specified in his contract - along with a year's health insurance and money for PR advice.

Start Quote

Public servants should not be rewarded for failure. But that was exactly what happened”

End Quote Margaret Hodge Chairwoman, Commons Public Account Committee

In its report, the Public Accounts Committee said that was out of line with severance packages in the public sector.

Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, committee chairwoman Margaret Hodge said: "Public servants should not be rewarded for failure. But that was exactly what happened when the BBC Trust paid off the former director general, George Entwistle.

"This cavalier use of public money is out of line with public expectations and what is considered acceptable elsewhere in the public sector."

The committee also said it was "extremely concerned" that the BBC Trust rejected an offer for the National Audit Office (NAO) to examine payments made to Mr Entwistle.

"This inhibited Parliament's ability to hold the Trust to account for its use of public money," the report said.

MPs also criticised the benefits and severance packages for other senior staff at the corporation as "excessively generous," including one of nearly £1m to former deputy director general Mark Byford, who left last year.

Mrs Hodge said: "We have asked the Comptroller and Auditor General to include in his 2013 programme of work on the BBC an examination of severance payments and benefits for senior managers."

BBC Trust chairman Chris Patten said the criticisms made by MPs were "unfair".

"I think the treatment we have had from them has been a bit shabby," he told Today, arguing that the committee had been sent a detailed account of the legal advice used to reach a decision regarding the former director general.

"I don't think they have been fair because they don't look at our legal arguments at all."

And, where the pay-off was concerned, he said: "We've taken legal advice about whether we could actually take any money back. In order for us to do so we'd have to be able to argue that, on the basis of what Pollard says, we would have been justified in making a summary dismissal of the former director general and I doubt whether we would get the legal go-ahead for that.

Acting director general Tim Davie defends the BBC's response to the Pollard Review

"But we do have to look at that and we have been looking at it."

A BBC Trust spokeswoman acknowledged £450,000 was a "very substantial sum", but insisted the terms reached were "the best available in the circumstances".

She said it was "simply wrong" to suggest there had been an option to halve that amount, adding a constructive dismissal would have been costly, messy and drawn out.

The Trust had suggested a wider study of severance payments at the BBC, which the NAO was to undertake, she added.

An internal email issued by the BBC's director of news Helen Boaden - who returned to her post on Thursday after stepping aside during the Savile crisis - described the recent criticisms of the corporation as "bruising".

"All of us, and me especially, need to take that criticism very seriously."

She said work was to begin on addressing the Pollard recommendations, adding: "There is much to learn, especially about sharing better within News Group and with the rest of the BBC.

"But these are challenges which we will meet, and we'll begin work in earnest in the New Year."

'Fundamental overhaul'

Meanwhile, Labour MP Barry Sheerman called for Lord Patten to resign, telling the Commons he was shocked to hear the BBC Trust chairman describe the PAC report as "unfair and shabby".

But chairman of the culture media and sport select committee, John Whittingdale, said he did not believe Lord Patten should go, and called for a "fundamental overhaul of the management structure at the BBC".

He added: "The BBC is bloated with too many managers, too little responsibility and having too much money being spent on administration."

Prime Minister David Cameron's official spokesman said the corporation was "accountable to its licence fee-payers" and must "absolutely" be able to "justify the level of severance money" paid out. The BBC Trust, he said, must ensure this was "taken into account".

On Wednesday, a report into a Newsnight programme that led to Tory peer Lord McAlpine being wrongly accused of child sex abuse found the BBC had failed to perform "basic journalistic checks".

In an interview with Newsnight, BBC acting director general Tim Davie defended the £2m cost of the separate Pollard review, saying: "It was right to spend that money because we had an allegation that was very fundamental to trust in the BBC."


More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • Comment number 1231.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this

    Comment number 1230.

    Just to clarify my recent comments earlier. I work on the Radio Listening Figs (Google Rajar Jobatbbcplease) we work on a job by job basis not per hour Zero hours contract, we're NOT covered by the minimum wage, don’t get sick pay or a pension. We are expected to work in some of the roughest areas of the UK placing diaries, if we don’t get them back complete we don’t get paid!

  • rate this

    Comment number 1229.

    I believe that the board of the BBC is appointed by the incumbent government. It seems this mismanagement is at a high level.

    Now who would believe that the current powers that be would be in any way involved in incompetency, very much out of character.

    I'm not suggesting that vested interests on the part of Cameron would play any role in this(Andy Coulson/Rebekah Brooks)

  • rate this

    Comment number 1228.

    Us Sky advocates

    Are dessprate for the Beeb to do well but they have lost there way soon the Beeb will louse ther L fee and we will all be the poorer

    So our only hope is that they get there act together

    and I for one hold out no hope at all

  • rate this

    Comment number 1227.

    MP's are wrong. George Entwistle's pay off was anything but cavalier. It was a very deliberate & considered act to move him out ASAP and more particularly keep him quiet. Yes, they were very free with public money but the more serious 'crime' was their determination to keep out of the spotlight and protect each other rather than determine the truth which the public wanted.


Comments 5 of 1231


More UK stories


Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • Woman standingMysterious miracle

    It's extremely unusual and shouldn't give false hope, but what makes the body beat cancer on its own?


  • A cyborg cockroachClick Watch

    The cyborg cockroach - why has a computer been attached to this insect’s nervous system?

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.