Dogs in England must be microchipped from 2016


Dog microchip date set for England

Related Stories

Every dog owner in England will have to microchip their animal from 2016 under plans intended to cut a rise in strays.

The microchips will be coded with owners' details, and owners who do not comply could face fines of up to £500.

A legal loophole may also be closed, meaning owners could be prosecuted over an attack by their dog on private land.

The RSPCA welcomed the proposals, but said it doubted that they alone would "make owners more responsible or ensure fewer dogs bite people".

Government figures reveal that more than 100,000 dogs are dumped or lost each year, at a cost of £57m to the taxpayer and welfare charities.

Ministers hope the change in the law will help reunite owners with lost or stolen pets and relieve some of the burden on animal charities and local authorities.

Stray dog stats broken down by reunited with owners, put down and microchipped

Environment Secretary Owen Paterson said: "It's ludicrous that in a nation of dog-lovers, thousands of dogs are roaming the streets or stuck in kennels because the owner cannot be tracked down."

He added: "Microchipping is a simple solution that gives peace of mind to owners. It makes it easier to get their pet back if it strays and easier to trace if it's stolen."

The change in the law will be effective from 6 April 2016. Any owner whose dog is found without a chip and can be traced by local authorities will have a short period of time to have the dog microchipped.

Laws governing dog attacks will also be extended to cover private property, closing a loophole which has meant that dog owners whose animals have attacked people on private property are immune from prosecution.

Welfare warnings

David Bowles, the RSPCA's head of public affairs, said: "Compulsory microchipping and extending the law to cover private property as well as public spaces is a welcome move.

"However, on their own we don't believe they will make owners more responsible or ensure fewer dogs bite people or other animals."

He said that the number of warnings issued to dog-owners because of poor welfare last year had been up 12% on 2011, while in the last four years there had been a 26% rise in the number dog bites requiring hospitalisation.

What is microchipping?

  • A small chip, the size of a grain of rice, is inserted between the shoulder blades of a dog using a sterile needle
  • The procedure does not require an anaesthetic and is no more painful than a standard vaccination
  • The chip is coated in a bio-compatible glass, the same material used in human pacemakers, which is not rejected by the dog's body
  • The device fuses to the dog's bodily tissue, meaning it will not move around

"If the government are trying to tackle these, we don't see how compulsory microchipping will help reduce either of these figures," he said.

Eight children and six adults have been killed in dog attacks since 2005, with many of these incidents taking place in the home, figures from the Department for Environment and Rural Affairs show.

In the past 12 months, more than 3,000 postal workers were attacked by out-of-control dogs, with 70% of these attacks happening on private property.

But householders will be protected from prosecution if their dog attacks a burglar or trespasser on their land.

Currently some animal charities, such as the Dogs Trust, Blue Cross and Battersea Dogs and Cats home, offer a free microchipping service to owners.

The procedure, which costs about £20-£30 at a private veterinary clinic, involves inserting a sterile chip the size of a grain of rice between a dog's shoulder blades.

Free microchips, donated by the Dogs Trust, will be circulated to veterinary clinics, although it is currently unclear whether vets will charge for the service.

Updating information

Clarissa Baldwin, Dogs Trust: "It's not going to cure all, but it will be a huge help"

Clarissa Baldwin, chief executive of the Dogs Trust charity, said the scheme would make "a huge difference".

Most of the 16,000 dogs looked after by the trust each year had not been microchipped, she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

"We could get those dogs back to their worried owners if they have a microchip and are identifiable," she said.

"With a register, kept up to date, people will be able to get their dogs back far more easily."

But Beverley Cuddy, editor of Dogs Today magazine, said the scheme was flawed because many owners did not keep their information up to date.

"The National Dog Warden Association says 40% of the dogs they pick up that are chipped have got incomplete or inaccurate data, meaning they can't be returned," she said.

"People don't know how to update their records. The chip is invisible - once it's in there people forget it's there. "

Compulsory microchipping was introduced in Northern Ireland in April 2012.

Similar plans were considered in Wales in 2012, although no formal policy announcement has yet been made.

The Scottish government has said that, while it recognised the benefits of microchipping, there was "no evidence compulsory microchipping would effectively tackle welfare issues".

A spokesman added that Holyrood would watch developments in the rest of the UK and "may consider the matter further in future".


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 494.

    This, in my view, is long overdue. We recently re-homed a dog and didn't think twice about having him chipped. I thought it was the standard thing to do already and was surprised to read the numbers that haven't had theirs chipped. Just a shame that the law doesn't come in to force for another three years!

  • rate this

    Comment number 359.

    Enforcement is what's needed. Breeders & Owners jointly & severably liable, one thereby can't blame the other. Bad owners won't bother getting them chipped, I agree, but at least they can be punished now for that failure & if the punishment is big enough then hopefully a deterrent in the long-term. My Dobermann was chipped, trained, sociable and 100% tolerant of clumsy kids. Yours can be too.

  • rate this

    Comment number 199.

    All puppies should be chipped by whoever bred them. When they were sold, the breeders/previous owner should have to apply for a change of ownership - just like selling a car.
    Make it the responsibility of the breeder/seller and you remove much of the issue with regard to lazy owners.

    If a stray is found unchipped it should be chipped then the owner billed when found.

  • rate this

    Comment number 125.

    This is simple, sensible and cost-effective - all good dog (and cat) owners already do this. Having sanctions available for those who don't comply is very much a step in the right direction - owning dogs in particular is a responsibility and should never be done lightly.

  • rate this

    Comment number 99.

    I am a dog owner and have a rottweiler and an american bulldog X DDB. Both microchipped. I would go even further: compulsory dog behaviour tests / training classes. After all we have a driver license to drive cars. Lets put the responsibility where it belongs: the dog owners and not the dogs.


Comments 5 of 6


More UK stories


Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • BooksNew novels

    BBC Culture takes a look at ten new books to read in March


  • TomatoesClick Watch

    The smart garden that fits inside your house and provides fresh healthy food

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.