Tax avoiders should be named and shamed, says watchdog

A man views a tax return form A spending watchdog says the taxman is losing the "game of cat and mouse" with tax avoidance firms

Related Stories

Tax avoiders should be "named and shamed" to discourage people from using legal loopholes to avoid paying their fair share, a spending watchdog says.

The Commons public accounts committee said HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) lost out on £5bn a year and tax avoidance firms were "running rings" around it.

HMRC said it had a "good track record" of defeating such schemes.

Meanwhile, Labour leader Ed Miliband says firms in the UK should publish the amount of tax they pay in the country.

Mr Miliband has already called for greater transparency in corporate tax bills, but speaking during a visit to Scandinavia, he said if international action failed to deliver a change in corporate behaviour, the government should take action at home.

'Boutique' schemes

The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report warned the taxman was losing the "game of cat and mouse" to clients and promoters of tax avoidance schemes as they deliberately took advantage of the time it takes HMRC to shut such schemes down.

HMRC must start publicly listing promoters and those who use their schemes, the committee said.

Jim Harra, director general of business tax at HMRC, says it is "well aware" of schemes and "who is promoting and using them".

Last year comedian Jimmy Carr said he had made a "terrible error of judgement" after it emerged that he had used a complex scheme to reduce his tax bill. The K2 tax-avoidance scheme Carr is said to have used enabled members to pay income tax rates as low as 1%.

Labour MP Margaret Hodge, who chairs the PAC, said: "Promoters of 'boutique' tax avoidance schemes, like the one brought to our attention by the case of Jimmy Carr, are running rings around HMRC.

"They create schemes which exploit loopholes in legislation or abuse available tax reliefs such as those intended to encourage investment in British films, and then sign up as many clients as possible, knowing that it will take time for HMRC to change the law and shut the scheme down."

Chas Roy-Chowdhury, head of tax at the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, says naming and shaming is a dangerous game to play.

"Where do you draw the line?" he said.

"There isn't a clear cliff edge between what you could say is acceptable tax planning and what is unacceptable tax avoidance. I think there's some difficulty in terms of where do you pitch it in terms of where you name and shame."

Tax rules mean promoters must notify HMRC of new avoidance schemes, which has led to the swift closure of some, according to the PAC's report.

But it warned that officials did not know how many promoters were ignoring the requirement.

Mrs Hodge said: "We are also alarmed to hear that promoters are getting off paying fines for not disclosing their schemes by pleading that, in the opinion of a QC, they have a 'reasonable excuse' for non-disclosure. HMRC is right to explore how to make it more difficult for this tactic to work.

"The number of cases HMRC takes to court is tiny compared to the overall caseload. It must make use of the additional resources it has been given to act much more urgently to investigate and close down new schemes and to bring more cases to court."

'Small hardcore'

Jim Harra, director general of business tax at HMRC, said it had a "good track record" of defeating tax avoidance schemes.

Jimmy Carr Jimmy Carr was widely criticised last year for taking part in a tax avoidance scheme

"There is a small hardcore of firms who are persisting in selling schemes which are of increasing poor quality to the public and we are making all the efforts we can to steer people away from these dubious schemes," he told the BBC.

He said the £5bn in income mentioned in the report represented 1% of all the tax HMRC collected every year, and it won 85% of all the tax avoidance cases it took to court.

Mr Harra also said HMRC already named avoidance schemes that had failed and the promoters who had pushed them.

A recent meeting of finance ministers of the G20 group of nations in Moscow pledged to crack down on tax avoidance by multinational companies.

The move, led by the UK, France and Germany, could see the development of measures to stop firms shifting profits from a home country to pay less tax elsewhere.


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • Comment number 890.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this

    Comment number 871.

    It seems that this country is obsessed with tax.

    Whenever the government makes changes to the tax/benefits system you hear indignant cries from the media and opposition politicians about a pasty tax or a granny tax or a charity tax and now even a bedroom tax.

    Doctors only yesterday called out for a fizzy drinks tax.

    Tax this, tax that, tax everything.

    No wonder people try and avoid paying.

  • rate this

    Comment number 733.

    Naming and shaming will change the world of business profit is everything and morals are for wimps. Close all the loopholes and make sure they pay the correct amount of tax.

    Until this happens the average taxpayer (you and me) will continue to pick up the shortfall because we're easy targets,

  • rate this

    Comment number 729.

    Hands up those with an ISA? You're a tax avoider. Hands up any tradesman who's taken cash in hand? You're a tax avoder. Hand up any self employed who's over stated their expenses? You're a tax avoider. Everyones at it, so who do you shame?

  • rate this

    Comment number 434.

    I wonder how many of the people who critcise tax avoiders have ever paid cash to get some work done? If so, you're probably helping a tax evader which is illegal, whereas evasion is not.

    As for the "soak the rich commenters". If we got rid of the rich who subsidise the rest of us, would these commenters actually support themselves, or would just look elsewhere for a free lunch?


Comments 5 of 17


More UK stories


Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • KnucklesGood or bad?

    For many it can be very satisfying to 'crack' the bones in your hand, but is it bad for you?


  • BatteriesClick Watch

    More power to your phone - the lithium-ion batteries that could last twice as long

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.