Police and crime commissioner elections 'failed voters'

 
Ballots being counted in Avon and Somerset The Electoral Reform Society described the elections as "chaotic"

The elections for police and crime commissioners "failed both candidates and voters alike", a report by the Electoral Reform Society has said.

The polls took place in 41 police force areas in England and Wales, and had a turnout of just 15%, a peacetime low.

The Electoral Reform Society said a poll it commissioned showed almost 90% of people still do not know who their elected representative is.

The Home Office said it would look at the points made in the report.

PCCs replaced police authorities in England and Wales - except in London - in what the Home Office described as "the biggest democratic reform in policing in our lifetimes".

The commissioners will be in post until 2016 and will have the power to set policing priorities, budgets and also to hire and fire chief constables.

'Left in the dark'

In its report, the Electoral Reform Society, an independent campaign group, described November's elections as "chaotic".

It said turnout was affected because they were held in winter, and voters were not given enough information.

A Populus poll commissioned by the society, and carried out last month, showed just 11% of the 1,624 respondents knew who their elected PCC was, it said.

The society has recommended that:

  • Another major election should never be held in winter months, as it discourages people from turning out
  • Voters should not be "left in the dark" about who or what they are voting for
  • There should be a level playing field for candidates through well-designed election rules

Katie Ghose, chief executive of the Electoral Reform Society said: "This was a flagship policy designed to reconnect the public and the police. Yet, after spending £75m, nearly 90% of Britons have no idea who their elected police and crime commissioner even is.

"November's bungled poll failed both candidates and voters. Government mismanagement has handed our elected commissioners a poisoned chalice, and it remains unclear how they can overcome it.

"The Electoral Commission's forthcoming review must not pull its punches. The government has singularly failed to accept any responsibility and would like to see nothing more than a whitewash."

'Bigger mandate'

Last week, the Home Office was criticised for not having "sufficient resources or the level of expertise" required to run effective elections.

The Association of Electoral Administrators (AEA) - a body for electoral staff, which has more than 1,700 members - also criticised the timing of the PCC elections, saying it was "not in the interests of voters".

The Home Office gave an identical response to the latest criticisms.

"More than five million people turned out to vote for the first ever election of police and crime commissioners, giving them an infinitely bigger mandate than the unelected and invisible police authorities they replaced," a spokeswoman said.

"That number will only grow in the future as people see the real impact PCCs are already making in their areas, delivering on public priorities in tackling crime.

"The Home Office will look at the points made in this report, along with the conclusions of the Electoral Commission's upcoming assessment."

 

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +11

    Comment number 371.

    My PCC is the Chair of our former Police Committee (no change there). What annoys me with this waste of time and money is that police priorities are now politcally dictated and the money spent on the PCCs and their staff could be more usefully allocated to "proper" policing.

  • rate this
    +11

    Comment number 370.

    I'd support all of the comments on here which suggest this office is a major waste of time & money,though I would add the following.Having just had dealings with my local PCC,I now realise that as far as putting more officers on the ground in areas where they're needed,they're also powerless.Which leads me to the conclusion that this was nothing more than another diversionary PR exercise by govt.

  • rate this
    +37

    Comment number 154.

    I have no idea who my PCC is. I did not vote because there was no opportunity to vote against this change. Since the vote, I have never heard it mentioned either locally or nationally. 75 milion pounds wasted that could have been spent so much better on more urgent matter such as more police on the street. I can't remember the last time i saw one walking around.

  • rate this
    +115

    Comment number 26.

    An election nobody wanted for a post nobody wanted - and they call this democracy.

    I have voted in every election since I was 18. In this one I went in and spoiled my ballot to register a protest.

    What a waste of money - and money is still being wasted on the inflated salaries of these commissioners and their crony staff.

  • rate this
    +124

    Comment number 24.

    The Government said they wanted independent candidates to stand, and not have them tied to a political party.

    And what happened ? All my candidates belonged to one party or another. Why ? because they had to raise £5000 to stand, so they needed party funding, whereas independent people had to find £5000 themselves.

    Just what exactly did the Government think was going to happen ?

 

Comments 5 of 9

 

More UK stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • PortlandTake it easy

    Could this be the most relaxed business city in the world?

Programmes

  • Papers Please gameClick Watch

    Meet the ‘bedroom programmer’ whose game has sold half a million copies and won a Bafta

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.